Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY”
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED November 8, 2023 RONALD HARDY, ET AL., EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK Plaintiffs Below, Petitioners INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
Leech v. 3M Co.public domain
SECTION: “G”(4) ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Margaret Leech’s (“Leech”) “Motion to Remand to State Court.”1 Having considered the motion, the memoranda in support and in opposition, the record, and the applicable law, the Court will deny the motion. I. Background <
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. 3M Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (the “Riv-erkeeper”) filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 7002(a)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. *1156§ 6972(a)(1)(B) (the “RCRA”). Doc. 1. The court has for consider
Brian Adams v. 3M Companypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0078p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BRIAN ADAMS, et al., │ Plaintiffs-Ap
George Amador v. 3M Companypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2899 ___________________________ In re: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation ------------------------------ George Amador Plaintiff - Appellant
NicSand, Inc. v. 3M Co.public domain
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by Judges DAUGHTREY, COLE, and CLAY. In a recent dissent, Justice Stevens wrote nostalgically about times gone by, when most “highspeed driving took place on two-lane roads rather than on superhighways” and “when split-second judgments about the risk of passing a slowpoke in the face of oncoming traffic were routine.” Scott v.
Ronald Hardy v. 3M Companypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2025 Term FILED November 7, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 23-717 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK
State of Maine v. 3M Companypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1709 STATE OF MAINE, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. 3M COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
KEARSE, Circuit Judge: In these two civil enforcement actions for securities fraud — brought, respectively* by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against defendants Stephen Walsh and Paul Greenwood, et al., and consolidated by this Court for appeal — various entities that were defrauded by the defend
3M Co. v. Intertape Polymer Group, Inc.public domain
423 F.Supp.2d 958 (2006) 3M COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP, INC., Central Products Company, and Intertape Polymer Corporation, Defendants. No. Civ. 03-2651JRTFLN. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 24, 2006. *959 *960 Daniel J. Brown and Thomas W. Tinkham, Dorsey
Scott v. Amazon.com, Inc.public domain
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON FEBRUARY 19, 2026 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON FEBRUARY 19, 2026 SARAH R. PENDLETON
Kevin Hardwick v. 3M Co.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0256p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 │ PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATI
NicSand, Inc. v. 3M Companypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0424p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - NIC
513 F.Supp.2d 322 (2007) BRADBURN PARENT TEACHER STORE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. 3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY). Civil Action No. 02-7676. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 14, 2007. *323 *324 Charles M. Jones, Jones Ost
In re 3M Bair Hugger Litig.public domain
CONNOLLY, Judge Appellants brought product-liability actions in state and federal courts, alleging that respondent's forced-air warming device (FAWD) used to maintain patients' normal body temperature during surgery increased the risk of surgical-site infection (SSI). Each party moved to exclude the *19other party's experts; appellants moved to ad
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED _______________ November 23, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0014 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED _______________ November 23, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0014 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
3M Company v. Simeon Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2004-IA-00289-SCT 3M COMPANY v. SIMEON JOHNSON, et al. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/24/2004 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: BARRY W. FORD WALKER (BILL) JONES, III
3M Company v. Simeon Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-CA-01651-SCT 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. SIMEON JOHNSON, JAMES CURRY, BOBBY JOE LAWRENCE AND PHILLIP PATE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/30/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: DONN
3M Company v. Curtis Lee Hintonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-IA-02459-SCT 3M COMPANY v. CURTIS LEE HINTON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/25/2003 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: SCOTT WILLIAM BATES WALKER W. (BILL) JONES, III