Cases

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

MAIN, Judge.1 The appellant, Tierra Capri Gobble, was convicted of murdering her four-month-old son Phoenix Parrish, an offense defined as capital by § 13A-5-40(a)(15), Ala. Code 1975, because Phoenix was under the age of 14. The jury recommended, by a vote of 10 to 2, that Gobble be sentenced to death. The circuit court followed the jury’s recommendation and sentenced Gobble to death.

ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. In this litigation, Plaintiff Board of Commissioners of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority — East (“Plaintiff’) seeks damages and injunctive relief against ninety-two oil and gas companies whose actions have allegedly caused erosion of coastal lands, leaving south Louisiana increasingly exposed to tropical storms and hurri

Bekd, J. (After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. The bill of exceptions brought by Ira W. Williams contained the following recital of facts:- “Plaintiff’s attorneys also contend that Ira W. Williams acknowledged service upon said petition .as appears on said petition, bearing date of the 18th day of May,' 1921. To this alleged acknowledgment, by permission of the court, Ira W. Williams filed his

1 Reported in 15 N.W.2d 162, 459. After considerable pretrial maneuvering and skirmishing, the details *Page 364 of which are unimportant here, this action was brought on for trial with the parties alligned and battling for objectives as follows: A. Erickson-Hellekson-Vye Company, the original plaintiff, so

808 So.2d 1041 (1999) Roy Edward PERKINS v. State. CR-93-1931 Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. November 19, 1999. Rehearing Denied February 18, 2000. *1052 Joseph S. Dice, Tuscaloosa; and Andrew A. Smith, Northport, for appellant. Bill Pryor, atty. gen.; and Jeremy W. Armstrong, Paul H. Blackwell, Jr.

MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW OF PHASE I, PHASE II AND PHASE III AND ORDERS TO CLERK VOLUME I OF TWO VOLUMES, containing: Complete Table of Contents for both volumes Pages 385 to 462, inclusive. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I PHASE I PAGE Introduction 385 PHASE I FINDINGS OF FA

510 F.Supp. 381 (1981) In re MIDWEST MILK MONOPOLIZATION LITIGATION. Robert B. ALEXANDER et al., Plaintiffs, v. The NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION, INC., et al., Defendants, v. ASSOCIATED MILK PRODUCERS, INC., et al., Counterclaim Defendants. JPML Docket No. 83. Civ. No. 19191-1. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D. January 29, 1981.