Cases

PER CURIAM. ORDER Sharon Brooks (“Wife”) appeals the judgment entered by the trial court dissolving her marriage to Robert Brooks (“Husband”). Wife claims the trial court erred in: (1) finding the property located *210at 2720 Hallon Street in Idaho was separate and not marital property; and (2) awarding the Ml amount of equity in 2720 Ha

Thompson, Chief Justice. In this murder case, which was tried after January 1, 2013, the effective date of the new Evidence Code, we are called upon to decide whether the admission of other acts evidence to prove identity, motive and course of conduct was error. We find the trial court erred in admitting the other acts evidence and reverse appellant’s conviction.

452 B.R. 809 (2011) In re Travis Joe BROOKS, Debtor. Linda S. Parks, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Travis Joe Brooks, Emprise Bank, as Successor to First Commercial Bank, N.A., Dale Prather and Patricia Prather, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-12383. Adversary No. 10-5005. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. July 14, 2011. *811

Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before me on a motion (Doc. No. 91) for summary judgment filed by defendant Forward Air, Inc. (Forward). Plaintiffs Gary, Nicholas and Ryan Rohlfs (the Rohlfs) have filed a resistance (Doc. No. 102) and Forward has filed a reply. Doc. No. 110. The Rohlfs' also filed a notice (Doc. No. 112) of supplemental authority. I find that

*625ORDER Robert Brooks pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court counted three prior convictions for violent felonies and thus sentenced Brooks under the Armed Career Criminal Act, id. § 924(e), to the statutory minimum of 180 months’ imprisonment. Brooks argues that the district court erred by including in that tota

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice, dissenting. Today the court is asked to determine whether the trial court erred in dismissing a plaintiff corporation’s contract claims against an individual defendant for lack of personal jurisdiction. The corporation, appellant Baker Hughes Incorporated, asserts that appellee Robert E. Brooks consented to personal jurisdiction by means of forum-selection clauses in the contracts

620 F.3d 896 (2010) Robert BROOKS, Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee. No. 09-3454. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 15, 2010. Filed: September 3, 2010. Chester Harris Lauck, III, argued, Brian M. Bowen, on the brief, Little Rock, AR, for appellant. Scott Harper Tucker, argued, Robert S. Shaf

STEWART, J. hWe granted writs in this matter to review the trial court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment by the defendant, Pershing, LLC Delaware (“Pershing”). At issue is whether Pershing is a “bank” under Chapter 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”), La. R.S. 10:4-101 et seq., such that the failure of the plaintiff, Debbie Jo Brooks (“Brooks”), to provide notice of unauthorized signatures on certa

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge THACKER and Judge GRIMM joined. DIAZ, Circuit Judge: We consider here the scope of Fourth Amendment protections as applied to individuals on federal supervised release. In February 2013, Eric Barker was serving a term of supervised release in connection with a felony dru

PERRY, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent. In my view, the challenged provisions of chapter 2011-68, Laws of Florida, amount to an insufferable and unconstitutional “bait and switch” at the expense of public employees who were members of the Florida Retirement System (FRS) prior to July 1, 2011.8 I would affirm the trial court’s ruling and hold that the plain meaning of the pres

ORDER G. ALAN WALDROP, Justice. The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal is overdue. The order concerning appellant’s plea to the jurisdiction was signed on December 15, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed January 3, 2006. Because this interlocutory appeal is accelerated, the reporter’s record was due January 13, 2006. See

636 S.E.2d 893 (2006) 49 Va. App. 68 Christopher Roosevelt SCOTT v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 2023-05-1. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Chesapeake. November 14, 2006. *894 Brooke E. Woodzell, Assistant Public Defender (Norfolk Public Defender's Office, on brief), for appellant. Donald E. J

SCHRODER, Justice, Concurring in Result only. I disagree with the majority’s view that evidence of Brooks’ sexual promiscuity, past sexual behavior and that she liked sex too much was relevant to the issue of damages. This presumes that a woman who is more sexually active and/or promiscuous will be less affected by being raped and suffer fewer damages. I believe this type of evidence was what the Rape Shield

92 S.W.3d 878 (2002) James E. GIDDENS, Appellant, v. Karen BROOKS, M.D. and Memorial Medical Center of East Texas, Appellees. No. 09-01-142 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted November 15, 2002. Decided December 19, 2002. *879 James E. Giddens, Tennessee Colony, pro se.

844 N.E.2d 429 (2006) 363 Ill. App.3d 884 300 Ill.Dec. 431 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lisa Dawn SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-04-1054. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. February 14, 2006. *431 Steven Skelton, Bloomington, for Lisa Sco

OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. This matter comes on before this court on plaintiff David C. Brooks’ appeal from orders dated April 16, 2002, and April 17, 2002, respectively entered on April 16, 2002, and April 18, 2002, in this civil action arising from a dispute regarding Brooks’ dealings with Discover Financial Services. As Brooks explains in his brief, “[t]his case revolves around a serie

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 26, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01266-CV ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, Appellant V. SCOTT GINSBURG, Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

152 F.Supp.2d 1317 (2001) Richard A. BORGNER, D.D.S., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert G. BROOKS, M.D., in his Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of Health, et al., Defendants. No. 4:99CV211-WS. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. March 21, 2001. *1318 Marilyn Josephine Marshall, Marilyn J Marsh

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillip A. Holmes and the briefs and arguments on appeal. The Full Commission adopts and affirms the Deputy Commissioner's holding and enters the following Opinion and Award. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law

604 N.W.2d 345 (2000) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Wesley BROOKS, petitioner, Appellant. No. C1-98-2388. Supreme Court of Minnesota. January 13, 2000. As Modified March 15, 2000. *346 Samuel A. McCloud, Kelly Vince Griffitts, Shakopee, for appellant. Michael A. Hatch, Minnesota Attorney General, St.