⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “SCALIA v. LOCAL 98, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983-11-15 · Published · cited 56× · 721 F.2d 1355; 232 U.S. App. D.C. 194; 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3169; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15294
Opinion for the Court in parts I-V.B filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. Opinion for the Court in part V.C filed by Circuit Judge WALD. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALD. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. Separate concurring statement filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. GIN
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-12-28 · Published · cited 16× · 911 F.3d 1195
Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Judge Randolph. Millett, Circuit Judge: *1199 Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. operates one of the largest recycling plants in the world. To operate its plant, Browning-Ferris contracts with Leadpoint Business Servic
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-07-15 · Published · cited 3× · 118 F. Supp. 3d 554; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92041; 2015 WL 4279720
MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. This putative class action challenges — on First and Fourteenth Amendment and dormant Commerce Clause grounds — the constitutionality of several New York laws and regulations that,, like those of all or most other states, prohibit non-lawyer equity ownership in law firms. The matter, which the Court previously dismissed for lack of standing, is, on remand from
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997-05-20 · Published · cited 0× · 113 F.3d 1259; 324 U.S. App. D.C. 317; 145 A.L.R. Fed. 769; 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2257; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11757
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge WALD, with whom Chief Judge EDWARDS and Circuit Judge ROGERS and Circuit Judge TATEL join. *1261Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON, with whom Circuit Judge SENTELLE and Circuit Jud
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-08-20 · Published · cited 81× · 734 F.3d 764; 2013 WL 4420775; 196 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2609; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17272
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-2111 No. 12-2447 ___________________________ National Labor Relations Board lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. RELCO Locomotives, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ___________________________ No. 12-2203 No. 12-2503 ___________________________ RELCO Locomotives, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-04-06 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARGDA PIERRE-NOEL, on behalf of her minor child K.N., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-00070 (TNM) BRIDGES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is about who must ensure that a disabled ch
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997-05-20 · Published · cited 15× · 113 F.3d 1259
113 F.3d 1259 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2257, 145 A.L.R. Fed. 769,324 U.S.App.D.C. 317, 65 USLW 2769,133 Lab.Cas. P 10,006, 134 Lab.Cas. P 10,006 DIAMOND WALNUT GROWERS, INC., Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,Cannery Workers, Processors, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local601 and International Brotherhood of Teamsters,AFL-CIO, Intervenors. No. 95-1075.<
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-08-03 · Published · cited 1× · 316 F. Supp. 3d 349
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge *355Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND...357 A. PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT TO THE FEC...357 B. FEC'S DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT...360 C. THE INSTANT LITIGATION...364 II. LEGAL STANDARDS...365
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 10-3891 STATE OF M ICHIGAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and G RAND T RAVERSE B AND OF O TTAWA AND C HIPPEWA INDIANS, Intervenor-Appellant, v. U NITED STATES A RMY C ORPS OF E NGINEERS, et al., Defendants-Appe
United States Tax Court · 1993-02-09 · Published · cited 18× · 100 T.C. 93; 1993 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8; 100 T.C. No. 8
ERNEST AND MARY C. HORTON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentHorton v. CommissionerDocket No. 3386-91United States Tax Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013-07-17 · Published · cited 3× · 722 F.3d 609
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1514 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY SOUTHEAST, LLC, Respondent. _______________ On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (11-CA-73779)
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016-04-25 · Published · cited 7× · 182 F. Supp. 3d 320; 2016 WL 1650774
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT... 332 A. North Carolina Voting Laws... 332 1. Voter ID... 332 2. Early Voting... 332 3. Out-of-Precinct Provisional Voting... 334
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2016-11-15 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-16-00761-CV 1380026
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-05-01 · Published · cited 52× · 251 F. Supp. 2d 176; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7834; 2003 WL 2010983
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS