⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “SANDRA FIGUEROA CABRERA”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 13, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-1890 Lower Tribunal No. 23-4115-SP-05 ________________ Universal X Rays, Corp., a/a/o Yensy Cuba, Petitioner, vs. Infinity Auto Insuranc
People v. Brinsonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04383
People v Brinson (2025 NY Slip Op 04383) People v Brinson 2025 NY Slip Op 04383 Decided on July 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorre
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2023-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2023 TSPR 9 Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus Inactivo de octubre de 2020 a 211 DPR ___ diciembre de 2022 Número del Caso: EM-2023-1 Fecha: 31 de enero de 2023 Materia: Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus Inactivo de octubre de 2020 a diciembre de 2022. Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso de compilación y pub
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2012-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2012 TSPR 180
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2012 TSPR 180 Aprobación de Baja Voluntaria y Cambio de Estatus Inactivo correspondiente al 187 DPR ____ Periodo de enero a septiembre de 2012 Número del Caso: TS-9044 y otros Fecha: 21 de noviembre de 2012 Este documento constituye un documento oficial del Tribunal Supremo que está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso de compilación y publicación o
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30177 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. V. 3:19-cr-00408- IM-1 LEOPOLDO RIVERA-VALDES, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted En Bane March 19, 2025 San Francisco, California Filed September 18, 2025 Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Ronald M. Gould, Consuelo
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012-11-14 · Published · cited 63× · 699 F.3d 621; 89 Fed. R. Serv. 1197; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23397; 2012 WL 5511708
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Following a bench trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine, Defendant-Appellant James M. Cameron (“Cameron”) was convicted of thirteen counts for crimes involving child pornography. Cameron now appeals, challenging various rulings by the district court before and after the trial. The challenged rulings include: (1) the denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment for insufficiency an
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 316× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2001-06-18 · Published · cited 1× · 2001 TSPR 91
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2001 TSPR 91 Pedro Colton Fontán Número del Caso: TS-3026 Fecha: 18/junio/2001 Oficina del Procurador General Lcda. Edna E. Rodríguez Benítez Procuradora General Auxiliar Lcda. Yvonne Casanova Pelosi
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 17-0818 12/22/2017 11:17 AM tex-21458098 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHOR
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 12× · 899 F.3d 567
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1990-08-31 · Published · cited 29× · 127 P.R. Dec. 1; 1990 PR Sup. LEXIS 256
Opinión disidente del Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García. PARA HACER CUMPLIDA JUSTICIA, AUNQUE MOR-TIFIQUE A ALGUNOS O PAREZCA QUIJOTESCO A OTROS, LAS VERDADES SIEMPRE HAY QUE EXPONER-LAS. Reconocemos los términos vigorosos y críticos de este disenso. Dejamos, sin embargo, al buen discernimiento de los lectores y electores el determinar si los mismos estáu justificados a la luz de las excepciones vislumbradas por
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 534 F.3d 1320; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1638; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under