Cases

620 F.Supp.2d 203 (2009) John H. THORNTON, Petitioner, v. Carolyn SABOL, Respondent. Civil Action No. 08-40243-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 1, 2009. *204 John H. Thornton, Ayer, MA, pro se. Timothy E. Moran, U.S. Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for Respondent. ORDER <

686 F.Supp.2d 131 (2010) Harry F. BARR Jr., Petitioner, v. Carolyn SABOL, Warden, Respondent. Civil Action No. 08-40187-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 12, 2010. *132 Thea A. Stewart, Thea A. Stewart, Attorney at Law, Oxford, MA, Dawn E. Worsley, Law Office of Dawn E. Worsley, Linda J. Argenti, Nashu

OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Vincent Gahafer appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his defamation suit against Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). Gahafer contends that when viewed in the light most favorable to him, the allegations of his complaint state a claim for defamation per se under Kentucky law. We disagree and

(2008) Kenneth GOLDEN, Petitioner, v. Carolyn A. SABOL, Respondent. Civil Action No. 2007-40297-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 08, 2008. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PATTI B. SARIS, District Judge. Action on motion: granting. I adopt the report and recommendation without objection. REPORT

By Judge Thomas D. Horne Complainants instituted the instant action for declaratory relief against the American Alliance Insurance Company and Travelers Insurance Company. They seek a determination of the limits of insurance coverage available to them under the pertinent policies for the damages they sustained on April 10,1991. On that date, a motor vehicle driven by Ernest H. Akers, Jr., and owned by his wife, Sheryl, colli

SETH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Barbara Sabol, brought suit charging discrimination on the basis of racé in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985, and 1986 against defendants, John E. Snyder, Assistant Commissioner, Division of Vocational Education, Department of Education for the State of Kansas; and C. Taylor Whittier, Commissioner of Education for the State of Kansas. <

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Philip Person appeals from the judgment of the district court 1 dismissing his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Appellant sought injunctive relief and monetary damages against the J. S. Alberici Construction Company for alleged discrimination on the basis of race. We affirm. Per

657 F.2d 962 26 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 513,26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,995Chester W. SETSER, Appellant,v.NOVACK INVESTMENT COMPANY, f/k/a Western Trucking Companyand Alvin S. Novack, Appellees. No. 80-1100. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 19, 1981.Decided July 21, 1981.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), dated May 11, 2015. The order denied the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPLR 8601 for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. *681 In July 2014, the petiti

Matter of Criss v New York State Dept. of Health (2021 NY Slip Op 01642) Matter of Criss v New York State Dept. of Health 2021 NY Slip Op 01642 Decided on March 19, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published b

OPINION Justice DONOHUE. In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether freight brokerage services are excepted from local business privilege taxation 1 under the “public utility” exception found in Section 301.1(f)(2) of the Local Tax Enabling Act (“LTEA”), Act of December 31, 1965,

05/17/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 3, 2019 Session CHARLES STINSON, ET AL. v. DAVID E. MENSEL, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hickman County No. 12-CV-4872 Deanna Johnson, Chancellor No. M2017-02497-COA-R

ORDER O’TOOLE, District Judge. The magistrate judge to whom this matter was referred has filed a report and recommendation (dkt. no. 14) with respect to the respondent’s Motion (dkt. no. 8) for Summary Judgment. Neither party has objected to the report. After carefully reviewing the pleadings, the parties’ motion papers, and the report and recommen*34

[Cite as State v. Bamonte, 2022-Ohio-1331.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-875 v. : (C.P.C. No. 18CR-1347) Anthony Bamonte,

ORDER O’TOOLE, District Judge. The magistrate judge to whom this matter was referred has filed a Report and Recommendation with respect to the respondent’s motion to dismiss or alternately for summary judgment. The petitioner objects to the Report and Recommendation for three reasons. He first contends that his security classification as a sex offender violates his due proce

ORDER NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge. “Report and Recommendation accepted and adopted.” REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION At all times relevant to these cross-motions for summary judgment, the plaintiff, Roger

ORDER NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge. After consideration of defendants’ objections thereto, Report and Recommendation accepted and adopted. DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION

Vacated and remanded by published ■ opinion. Judge AGEE - wrote the. opinion, in which Judge FLOYD and Judge THACKERjoined. AGEE, Circuit Judge: In this unfair competition case, we consider whether the Lanham Act permits the owner of a foreign trademark and its sister company to pursue false association, false advertising, and trademark cancellation clai

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, Senior District Judge. Pending before this Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by petitioner Israel Rodriguez (“Petition”) (Docket No. 1), which was opposed by the United States (Docket No. 4) and referred to Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas for a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 24). Magistrate Judge Are

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, Senior District Judge. Pending before this Court is a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence By A Person In Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed by Julio Ramirez-Bur-gos (“Petitioner”) (Docket No. 1), which was opposed by the United States (Docket No. 5) and referred to Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas for a Report and Recommendation (Docket N