Cases

McDEVITT, Chief Justice. STATEMENT OF FACTS In March of 1992, Buhl advertised for bids for a pupil transportation contract, pursuant to I.C. § 33-1510. The Scotts submitted the only bid, totalling $453,-565.96. Buhl rejected this bid, and it readvertised for bids. In its bid solicitation, Buhl reserved the right to “accept or reject or to select any portion thereof any or all bids and to waive

887 P.2d 1088 (1994) 126 Idaho 581 Jared AMBROSE, a minor child, By and Through F. Dean Ambrose and Susan Ambrose, husband and wife, the natural parents of Jared Ambrose; F. Dean Ambrose, individually; and Susan Ambrose, individually, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. BUHL JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 412, Defendant-Respondent. No. 20821. Court of Appeals of Idaho. De

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MIKE ZEYEN; OLIVIA ZEYEN; No. 23-35438 RACHAEL BOOTH; KIM A WOOD, D.C. No. 1:18-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellants, 00207-RCT LOGAN JONES; PEYTON JONES; AMY WEBER; KRISTAL CRIDER; OPINION DEAN CRIDER; NICK DELGADO; ASHLEY DELGADO, Appellants, v. BONNEVILLE JOINT DISTRICT, # 93; POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK DISTRICT, # 25; WEST ADA SC

SHEPARD, Justice, dissenting. I deem it important to keep in mind what this case is all about. To the majority its importance seems to be that an agreement to agree is a “contract” but a formal written contract is not really a contract, but by decision of this Court magically becomes open ended and subject to future negotiation. Perhaps more important is what this case does not involve. The majority opinion does n

17 P.3d 281 (2000) 135 Idaho 337 Mary FARNER and Michael Peila, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Cross-Appellants, v. IDAHO FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 91, Board of Trustees, Idaho Falls School District No. 91, and Board Members Alan Reed, Ernest Jensen, Jerry Wixom, Sue Fineman and Sharon Parry, in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Respondents. No. 25770. Supreme Court

971 P.2d 323 (1999) 132 Idaho 257 Allison GILMORE, Karen Remsen, Nona Stafford, Doug Vann and Enid Trenholm, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BONNER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 82, Defendant-Respondent. No. 23824. Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene, September 1998 Term. January 11, 1999. *324 John E. Rumel, Boi

BISTLINE, Justice. The Nampa Education Association is a local education organization which, at all times relevant to this appeal, was the exclusive representative of teachers of Nampa School District No. 131 pursuant to I.C. § 33-1273.1 See I.C. §§ 33-1271 to -1273. *139The Association represented the teachers in negotiations with

965 P.2d 1112 (1998) 92 Wash.App. 709 Kurt HOME and Brenda Home, husband and wife, Appellants, v. NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent. NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. JOHN GRAHAM ASSOCIATES, Third-Party Defendants. No. 21696-5-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. October 2, 1998.

BISTLINE, Justice. The plaintiff Monte Robinson brought an action to recover an additional ten percent of his base salary for the 1978-79 school year which he alleged was due under a policy of the Joint School District No. 331 to pay such an additional amount to teachers who taught six class periods each day. Robinson appeals from a decision of the district court which reversed on appeal a decision of the magistrate awarding j

DONALDSON, Justice. Plaintiff-appellant James W. Kolp appeals the district court’s denial of his request for a writ of mandamus compelling the Butte County School District No. Ill to reinstate him as a teacher for the district. We affirm in part and we reverse in part with a remand for further proceedings de novo. Appellant Kolp was employed as a certificated employee of the Butte County School D

Justice KIDWELL, dissenting in part. The majority affirms summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ claim based on an attractive nuisance theory. I would find genuine issues of material fact exist regarding each element of the attractive nuisance claim. Therefore, I respectfully dissent. In Nelson ex rel Nelson v. City of Rupert, this Court sta

J. JONES, J., dissenting. I dissent because I am unable to agree with the Court’s conclusion that article VIII, section 3 requires a vote of the people for contracts providing necessary supplies to carry on an on-going and long-standing municipal service. The framers of the Idaho Constitution were practical people. Their words and deeds indicate a dichotomy betwee

249 P.3d 405 (2011) Kristina DRINKALL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Darren DRINKALL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 37034. Court of Appeals of Idaho. March 2, 2011. *407 Darren Drinkall, Meridian, pro se appellant. Cosho Humprey, LLP; Franki J. Hargrave, Boise, for respondent. GUTIERREZ, Judge. Darren Drinkall appeals

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION ON REHEARING KIDWELL, Justice. Idaho State University (ISU) and the Department of Public Works (DPW) (collectively referred to as “the State”) solicited bids for renovation of the Physical Science Building at ISU. SE/Z Construction, L.L.C. (SE/Z) and Harris Brothers Construction, Inc. (Harris), among others, bid the project. The State determined that H

OPINION & ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................240 II. BACKGROUND..........................................................241 A. Core Allegations......................................................241 B. Procedural

968 P.2d 1097 (1998) 132 Idaho 188 Gordon ANDREA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE, Defendant-Respondent. No. 24289 Court of Appeals of Idaho. December 7, 1998. *1098 Michael J. Vrable, Hayden, for appellant. Lukins & Annis, Coeur d'Alene, for respondent. Susan P. Weeks argued.<

OPINION PICKARD, Judge. {1} Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant Albuquerque Public Schools. Plaintiff Yvette Lucero was injured when she tripped and fell on the grounds of the Apache Elementary School, where she had been watching her son’s Little League game. Lucero, her husband, and their two children filed suit f

TROUT, Chief Justice. I. NATURE OF THE CASE This is an appeal from the district judge’s dismissal based on lack of standing, of Appellant Brent Thomson’s (Thomson) complaint seeking a declaratory judgment invalidating the City of Lewiston’s (City) creation of an urban renewal plan (Plan) pursuant to Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code. We affir

21 P.3d 908 (2001) 135 Idaho 586 Chris and Betsy JORDAN, husband and wife, and Chris Jordan Volkswagen, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Paul BEEKS, individually, and Smith, Beeks & Hodges, P.L.L.C., Defendants-Respondents. No. 25592. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2000 Term. March 29, 2001. *910