Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “S.A.S.M. v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, The”
Chris Collins v. Doe Run Resources Corporationpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1848 ___________________________ Chris Collins, as Next Friend of: J.Y.C.C.; I.K.C.C.; E.A.C.C.; E.L.C.C.; A.R.C.C.; J.R.G.; F.R.A.; R.F.R.C.; S.S.L.; R.D.L.C.; G.N.A.A.; H.G.A.L.; A.X.E.A.; M.Z.A.B.; A.Y.A.G.; I.D.A.A.; J.D.A.E.; Y.D.T.; E.J.D.L.C.D.; N.G.C.V.; Y.G.C.F.; C.P
State Ex Rel. Doe Run Resources Corp. v. Neillpublic domain
128 S.W.3d 502 (2004) STATE ex rel. The DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION, et al., Relators, v. Honorable Margaret M. NEILL, Presiding Judge, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit, City of St. Louis, Respondent. No. SC 85451. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. February 10, 2004. Rehearing Denied March 30, 2004. *503 Andrew
Sr. Kate Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1625 ___________________________ Sr. Kate Reid; Megan Heeney, as next friends of; A. O. A.; Meylith A. Caso Arroyo; Y. C. A.; A. C. C.; D. R. G.; J. R. G.; S. A. L.; Jean P. Quispe Morales; B. Q. M. Pla
Sr. Kate Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1625 ___________________________ Sr. Kate Reid; Megan Heeney, as next friends of; A. O. A.; Meylith A. Caso Arroyo; Y. C. A.; A. C. C.; D. R. G.; J. R. G.; S. A. L.; Jean P. Quispe Morales; B. Q. M. Pla
A.O.A. v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. Plaintiffs are numerous Peruvian children who allege that they have been injured by exposure to toxic substances from the La Oroya Complex, a metallurgical smelting and refining complex operating in La Oroya, Peru. Through their next friends, they filed these eleven actions in Missouri state court, alleging state tort claims against the American co
Hartford Acc. and Indem. v. Doe Run Resourcespublic domain
663 F.Supp.2d 771 (2009) HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 4:08-CV-1687 CAS. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. October 2, 2009. *773 James P. Ruggeri, Joshua D. Weinberg, Hogan & Hartson LLP, Washington, DC, M
Antero Resources Corporation v.public domain
The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203 2023 CO 13 Supreme Court Case No. 21SC533 Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Case No. 19CA1799 Petitioner: Antero Resources Corporation, v.
Su the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE THE DOE RUN RESOURCES ) No. ED103026 CORPORATION, ) ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County VS. ) 10SL-CC01716 ) AMERICAN GUARANTEE & ) Honorable Thomas J. Prebil LIABILITY INSURANCE and ) LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants, ) ) ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Filed: September 27, 2016 Appellant. ) OPINION This is an insurance coverage case. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance
Corder v. Antero Resources Corporationpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1716 Doc: 52 Filed: 01/05/2023 Pg: 1 of 39 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1715 GERALD W. CORDER; MARLYN C. SIGMON; GARNET C. COTTRILL; RANDALL M. CORDER; JANET C. PACKARD; LORENA KRAFFT; CHERYL MORRIS; TRACY BRIDGE; ANG
A.X.M.S. Corp. v. Friedmanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge. In 1993, an American expatriate leather-worker, his Chinese partner, and an American investor supplying seed money began an international trading company based in Hong Kong for the purpose of selling leather goods manufactured by a separate Chinese company also run, in part, by the American leatherworker. The leather-worker,
Gerald Corder v. Antero Resources Corporationpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1715 Doc: 54 Filed: 01/05/2023 Pg: 1 of 39 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1715 GERALD W. CORDER; MARLYN C. SIGMON; GARNET C. COTTRILL; RANDALL M. CORDER; JANET C. PACKARD; LORENA KRAFFT; CHERYL MORRIS; TRACY BRIDGE; ANG
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 18-1187 ══════════ ENDEAVOR ENERGY RESOURCES, L.P., PETITIONER, v. ENERGEN RESOURCES CORPORATION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE
Antero Resources Corporation v. Dale W. Steagerpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term __________________ FILED November 17, 2020 No. 18-1106 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK __________________
SHARPNACK, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case [1] This is the fourth 1 appeal in this litigation between the parties stemming from a contract for assistance in negotiation for the provision of water and sewer utility services in Boone County. Here, the trial court granted The Branham Corpora
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00310-CV YATES ENERGY CORPORATION, EOG Resources, Inc., Jalapeno Corporation, ACG3 Mineral Interests, Ltd., Glassell Non-Operated Interests, Ltd., and Curry Glassell, Appellants v.
James Huntsman v. Corporation of the Presidentpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES HUNTSMAN, No. 21-56056 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-02504- v. SVW-SK CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF OPINION JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Di
(Slip Opinion) Whether the Creation of Natcast Violates the Government Corporation Control Act The Government Corporation Control Act applies to an agency that brings a corporation into existence, even if the agency does not retain ownership of or control over the corporation. An agency cannot avoid the strictures of the Government Corporation Control Act by enlisting private individuals as proxies to incorporate an entity that would otherwise violate the Gov
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00178-CV ___________________________ ENERQUEST OIL & GAS, L.L.C., Appellant V. ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 141st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141-290089-
Windmill Run Associates, Ltd. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In re Windmill Run Associates, Ltd.)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION . LETITIA Z. PAUL, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The court has held a joint trial on the above captioned adversary proceeding, and *402in the instant Chapter 11 case, the “Amended Motion for (I) Allowance of Secured Claim and Reasonable Fees, Costs, and Charges Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016 and (ii) E
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 72 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2022 June 16, 2022 SKYCO RESOURCES, LLP, a Texas limited liability partnership, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. S-21-0161 FAMILY TREE CORPORATION