Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “S&G Hospitality, Inc.”
Francis Hospitality, Inc. v. Read Properties, LLCpublic domain
OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN Read Properties, LLC ("Read Properties") filed a complaint against Francis Hospitality, Inc. ("Francis Hospitality") and Delta Educational Systems, Inc. ("Delta") asserting claims for breach of contract, intentional interference with contract, and statutory business conspiracy under Code §§ 18.2-499 and -500. The circuit court found in favor o
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Arthur Armijo v. OVP Hospitality, Inc.public domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed March 10, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00727-CV ARTHUR ARMIJO, Appellant V. OVP HOSPITALITY, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
LAKXN Income, Inc. v. TLC Hospitality, LLCpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00415-CV ___________________________ LAKXN INCOME, INC., Appellant V. TLC HOSPITALITY, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096-315146-20 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Birdwell and Bassel, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwe
Gress v. Lakhani Hospitality, Inc.public domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of thi
JNM Hospitality, Inc. v. McDaidpublic domain
Grainger, J. This is an appeal from the dismissal of a claim brought by the commercial tenant of a condominium unit owner against the condominium trustees. The plaintiff, JNM Hospitality, Inc. (JNM), appeals from the summary judgment in favor of the defendant trustees of The Village at Forge Pond Condominium *353Trust (collectively the trust) ordered by a judge of
PER CURIAM. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed the patent infringement claims of Phonome-trics, Inc. (Phonometrics) against Hospitality Franchise Systems, Inc. and the other hotel operators (collectively, Hotels) under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Because Phonome-trics’ complaint met the liberal pleading requirements of Rule 12(b)(6), this court reverses and remands. I.
Nopper v. IGD Hospitality, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff David Nopper, dba Po’okela Group, brought this action against Defendant IGD Hospitality, Inc., dba IGD Group, alleging that Defendant breached the parties’ independent contractor services agreement. On February 3, 2016, Judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff based on Plaintiffs acceptance of an Offer of Judgment. EOF 18. Plaintiff now moves for
Hospitality Ventures/LaVista v. Heartwood 11, L.L.C. (In Re Hospitality Ventures/LaVista)public domain
358 B.R. 462 (2007) In re HOSPITALITY VENTURES/LAVISTA, a Georgia General Partnership, Debtor. Hospitality Ventures/LaVista, Plaintiff, v. Heartwood 11, L.L.C., Vesta Holdings I, L.L.C., and Vesta Holdings, Inc., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. DeKalb County, Georgia, and Tom Scott, in his official capacity as Tax Commissioner of DeKalb County, Third-Party Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-88200. Adversary
Letsch v. Southern Proper Hospitality, LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MIRJAM LETSCH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1840 (TJK) SOUTHERN PROPER HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Gypsy Kitchen, a restaurant in Atlanta, wanted to use one of Mirjam Letsch’s photos as a mural in it
Anderson v. Reel Hospitality, LLCpublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
26 Street Hospitality, LLP v. Real Builders, Inc.public domain
KAPSNER, Justice. ■ [¶ 1] 26th Street Hospitality, LLP (“Partnership”) appeals from the district court’s order granting a motion to compel arbitration; order lifting a stay in the proceedings, confirming the arbitration award, and awarding post-judgment interest; and final judgment. The Partnership argues the district court erred in ordering arbitration because the court was req
Harrington v. Fb Hospitality, LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRENDAN HARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-689 (TSC) DC WINERY, LLC d/b/a FIRST BATCH HOSPITALITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Brendan Harrington has sued DC Winery, LLC, along with two of it
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Prana Hospitality, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Plaintiffs Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”), MJ Publishing Trust, Beechwood Music Corporation, and Sony/ATV Latin Music Publishing LLC bring this action for copyright infringement against defendants Pra-na Hospitality, Inc. (“Prana”), Rajiv Shar-ma, and Payal Sharma. Plaintiffs claim that defendants, the owners of a New York City restaurant/bar, violate
J.D.S. v. S.G.S.public domain
Rel: October 3, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIA
Janu Inc v. Mega Hospitalitypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA22-194 Filed 07 February 2023 Wake County, No. 18CVS15437 JANU INC D/B/A STONECRAFTERS, AUM HOSPITALITY SERVICES, Plaintiffs, v. MEGA HOSPITALITY, LLC, MEGA-C HOSPITALITY, LLC, MEGA-B HOSPITALITY, LLC, MEGA-K HOSPITALITY, LLC, G.R. BHAT, and SUJATA BHAT, Defendants. Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 13 September 2021 by Judge Rebecca W.
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. In this action on a commercial account, the plaintiff, Hunter Douglas Hospitality, Inc. (“Hunter Douglas”), filed a motion for summary judgment after the defendant, Monolith Companies, LLC (‘Monolith”), failed to respond to requests for admission. The trial court granted Hunter Douglas’ motion, and Monolith now appeals, arguing that the requests for adm
Erik Holzbaur v. Trolley Square Hospitality, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ERIK HOLZBAUR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0181-MTZ ) TROLLEY SQUARE HOSPITALITY, LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, and ) ERIC C. SUGRUE, )
Galloro v. SAR Hospitality, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Galloro v. SAR Hospitality, L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-2751.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Brandon Galloro Court of Appeals No. L-24-1273 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0202403412 v. SAR Hospitality, LLC, et al. DECISION AND JUDG
Rasnick v. Krishna Hospitality, Inc.public domain
HINES, Justice. This Court granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Rasnick v. Krishna Hospitality, Inc., 302 Ga. App. 260 (690 SE2d 670) (2010), to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding as a matter of law that the defendant motel had no duty to comply with the plaintiffs requests to attempt a rescue of her husband from his medical peril. Finding no error in the judgment of the Court of Appeal