⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Ryder v. Platon”

Kassman v. KPMG LLPpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-02-07 · Published · cited 89× · 925 F. Supp. 2d 453; 2013 WL 452913; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17491; 117 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 596
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge: Plaintiffs, five women, have brought this action on behalf of themselves and a putative class of current and former female professional employees of Defendant KPMG LLP, the U.S. member firm of global accounting firm KPMG International, alleging various forms of employment discrimination. Defendant has moved to dismiss, strike, or transfer most of P
Utah Supreme Court · 2017-12-14 · Published · cited 33× · 2017 UT 89; 416 P.3d 663
This opinion is subject to revision before final Publication in the Pacific Reporter 2017 UT 89 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH MICHAEL NEESE, Appellant, v. UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, Appellee.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978-07-24 · Published · cited 231× · 576 F.2d 1157; 25 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1165; 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9986; 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8470; 17 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1712
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: This complex class action employment discrimination suit, now before us for the fourth time, illustrates the difficulties inherent in judicial efforts to remedy violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., by undoing the effects of past racial disc
Craig v. Craigpublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 129 Iowa 192; 105 N.W. 446
Deemer, J. Plaintiff and defendant- were married August 20, 1891, and as a result of this union three children were born unto them. They lived happily together until the *193latter part of the year 1902, when the defendant, who was a school director of his subdistrict, brought to his homo a young lady school-teacher, who had been employed by him to teach the school in hi