Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND, No. 09-99019 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:02-cv-00110-DGC CHARLES L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dav

803 F.Supp.2d 1032 (2011) Marvin Pete WALKER, Petitioner, v. Michael MARTEL, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent. No. C 94-1997 SBA. United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. March 31, 2011. *1038 Nanci L. Clarence, Nicole K. Howell, Clarence & Dyer LLP, Thomas B. Mayhew,

Cite as 2014 Ark. 427 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-462 MARK MARTIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL Opinion Delivered October 15, 2014 CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ARKANSAS AND HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE ARKANSAS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI STATE BOARD OF ELECTION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT COMMISSIONERS; RHONDA COLE;

276 S.W.3d 231 (2008) CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC., Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp., Entex Gas Marketing Co., Centerpoint Energy Field Services, Inc., and Centerpoint Energy Pipeline Services, Inc., Petitioners, v. MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, The Honorable James Scott Hudson, Jr., Weldon Johnson, and Angela Sullivan Engledowl, Respondents. No. 07-924. Supreme Court of Arkansas.

OPINION McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice. ¶ 1 These consolidated actions consider whether Arizona’s Sexually Violent Persons (SVP) act, Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) sections 36-3701 to 36-3717 (Supp.2002), comports with the substantive due process principles the United States Supreme Court outlined in Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 34

610 A.2d 1377 (1992) Robert W. RYAN, Plaintiff, v. Norman D. WEINER, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 12178. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Date Submitted: January 28, 1992. Date Decided: March 13, 1992. Date Revised: March 19, 1992. *1378 Merril L. Zebe, and Beth L. Jawitz, of Community

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (R. Doc. 3) and Compel Arbitration, filed December 6, 2017 (Doc. 5)("Motion"); and (ii) the Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Class Action Complaint and Serve [sic], filed January 10, 2018 (Doc. 16)("Surreply Motion"). The Cour

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Reconsideration Motion, filed September 15, 2018 (Doc. 25) ("Reconsideration Motion"). The Court held a hearing on October 25, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court committed manifest legal error in its Memorandum Opinion and Order,

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00320-CV ___________________________ KEITH D. AIKENS, Appellant V. CHARLENE K. DUELING, Appellee On Appeal from the 48th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial C

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0073 ══════════ In re Office of the Attorney General, Relator ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ═══════════════════════════════════════ PER CURIAM Justice Young did not participate in the decision. This manda

345 F.Supp.2d 672 (2004) FAMILY TRUST FOUNDATION OF KENTUCKY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Stephen D. WOLNITZEK, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 6:04-473-DCR. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, London Division. October 19, 2004. *675 James Bopp, Jr., Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom, Terre Haute, IN, Leroy Arlis Gilbert, Jr.

702 F.Supp.2d 295 (2010) INTERFAITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC., Graco Community Org., and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-480 (JAG). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 26, 2010. Opinion Denying Reconsideration July 12, 2010. *2

270 P.3d 887 (2012) The STATE of Arizona, Petitioner, v. Hon. Paul SIMON, Justice of the Peace of the Pima County Consolidated Justice Court of the State of Arizona, Respondent, and Charles C. Jimenez, Fabian Felipe Llinas, AnnaMarie Medina, Harley Steven Rogers, Walker J. Sirnio, and Connie Sue Tanner, Real Parties in Interest. No. 2 CA-SA 2011-0098. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Depart

DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice. The issue in this case is whether an attorney had authority to settle his client’s ejectment case. Appellees Carnell Johnson and Pamela Akins filed a petition for ejectment against Appellant Mary Dewitt on August 20, 1999. Trial was set for June 12, 2000, in the Pulaski County Circuit Court. On that same date, the parties’ attorneys notified the court that the matter was set

Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court. Sitting en banc, the United States Ah* Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) set aside Appellant’s death sentence. At the Government’s request, the CCA reconsidered, again sitting en banc, and affirmed the death sentence. The case is before us for mandatory review pursuant to Article 67(a)(1), Uniform Code of Mi

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge 11 This case involves two separate appeals concerning the Craighead County Circuit Court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of appellees Judy and Stanley Foster that ordered the specific performance of a contract where the Fosters were to purchase certain real property from appellees Linda Alden and Danny Brandon.

132 P.3d 825 (2006) 212 Ariz. 381 Brenda JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EARNHARDT'S GILBERT DODGE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. CV-05-0204-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. April 25, 2006. *826 Krohn & Moss, Ltd. by Marshall Meyers, Phoenix, Attorney for Brenda Johnson. Mary LaRue Walker

Elizabeth K. Dillon, United States District Judge In this civil rights action, Plaintiffs bring suit individually and on behalf of all similarly *602situated current and former employees of Lewis Gale Medical Center, LLC ("LGMC"), for racial discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1865 Filed June 19, 2024 COUNTY BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CLINTON ALLAN SHALLA and MICHELLE LYNN SHALLA, Defendants-Appellants. _______________________________________ CLINTON ALLAN SHALLA and MICHELLE LYNN SHALLA, Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. COUNTY BANK, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee. ______________________________________

FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FEB 16 2012 STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, ) 2 CA-SA 2011-0098 )