Cases

The following order has been entered on the Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 16th of November 2018 by State of NC:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of November 2018."State of NC shall have up to and including the 21st day of December 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 16th of October 2018 by State of NC :"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of October 2018."State of NC shall have up to and including the 21st day of November 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 13th of February 2019 by Defendant:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of February 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of April 2017 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Prepare Trial Transcript:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of April 2017."Court reporter shall have up to and including the 5th day of June 2017 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel.

PER CURIAM. In this case, we consider whether certain comments made by a prosecutor were impermissible. Gary Fontaine Bell seeks review of Bell v. State, 33 So.3d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), in which the First District Court of Appeal affirmed Bell’s convictions and sentences for lewd and lascivious molestation on a victim under twelve years of age by an offender eighteen years of age or older and for failure to appear.

KYZAR, Judge. hThe defendant, the City of Lake Charles, appeals from a district .court judgment reversing the decision of the Lake Charles Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board to uphold the termination of the plaintiff, Thomas J. 'Bell, Sr., from the Lake Charles Police Department, and ordering his immediate reinstatement with back pay. For the following reasons, we reverse and reinstate the decision of the Lake Cha

640 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2009) Edward H. BELL, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV S-07-2532 DAD. United States District Court, E.D. California. July 17, 2009. *1249 Bess M. Brewer, Bess M. Brewer and Associates, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff. Bobbie J. Montoya, SS, United S

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Janna DeWitt appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to her former employer, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (“SWBTC”), on her claims of disability discrimination and failure to accommodate her disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), as amended by ADA Amendments Act of 2008

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SAM A. CROW, Senior District Judge. This employment practices case comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff brings the following claims against Defendant: terminating her employment on the basis of her disability in violation of the ADA; failing to reasonably accommodate her in violation of the ADA; and terminating her in retaliation for her use

492 F.3d 743 (2007) Gary Bradford CONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, Respondent-Appellee. No. 99-5279. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 2, 2006. Decided and Filed: June 19, 2007. *744 *745 <

ORDER The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active * judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel. The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearin

*968 ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. Defendant PLIVA, Ine.’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint [Doc. No. 64] is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Shirley J. Bell filed this action on April 12, 2010, seeking to recover for personal injuries she received after taking the generic pre

486 F.Supp.2d 257 (2007) Renzer BELL, Plaintiff, v. SOUTH BAY EUROPEAN CORP., South Bay Bmw and Ryan Ludders, Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 472(PKC) (GWG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 23, 2007. Renzer Bell, Jacksonville, FL, Pro se. Michael Patrick Collins, Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, New York City, for Defendants. ME

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to compel Ryan Ruthenberg’s deposition testimony. The motion raises a question of first impression regarding whether an employee-union representative privilege should be adopted as a matter of federal common law in connection with a federal civil rights lawsuit. Plaintiffs argue

Justice Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. doing business as AT & T Texas (AT & T), a public utility company with facilities attached to a city bridge designated to be *581demolished, sought a declaratory judgment that the Harris County Flood Control District must bear the costs of relocating AT &

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge: Appellant Bell challenges the dismissal with prejudice of his case following the district court’s denial of his requests either to substitute a new “bellwether”1 plaintiff or to continue the scheduled trial date. The court’s actions were taken in the course of its management of thousands of similar MDL-consolidated suits for allegedly injurious formaldehyde exposure in

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA No. 16-15597 Michael Fuqua, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00286- v. NVW CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director of ADC Central Office; CAMIT, OPINION Correctional Officer II at Special Management Unit #1; FRANCISCO, CO III at SMU #1; STERNS, Sgt. at

590 F.3d 1176 (2010) CITY OF HERRIMAN, a municipality; James Lynn Crane, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated; Ryan Carter, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated; Marianne Carter, an individual, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated; Brett Wood, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated; Tamara Wood, an individual, on behalf of herself and others similarly situa

306 F.Supp.2d 718 (2004) Norma J. BELL, Executrix, Plaintiff v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant No. 99-7106. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 23, 2004. *719 Erwin J. Leizerman, Michael J. Leizerman, E.J. Leizerman & Associates, Toledo, OH, for Norma Bell, Executrix of Estate of Dece

SILER, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Philip R. Workman, under a death sentence, appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has raised numerous issues. For the reasons stated herein, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. I. Background The facts surrounding Workman’s conviction are stated by the Tennessee Supreme Court in