Cases

[Cite as Ohio Valley Business Advisors, L.L.C. v. AER Invest. Corp., 2017-Ohio-1283.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104771 OHIO VALLEY BUSINESS ADVISORS, L.L.C. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

DECISION Before the Court is an appeal from a decision ("Decision") of the Zoning Board of Review for the City of Newport ("Board" or "Zoning Board"), which granted the Newport Group, LLC ("Applicant" or "Appellee") several regulatory and dimensional variances and a special use permit. Appellant J. Class Management, Inc. ("Petitioner" or "Appellant"), an owner of neighboring property, seeks reversal of the Zoning Board's

Per Curiam. This case concerns the residuary clause of a will and requires us to determine whether an ambiguity exists as to the identity of one of the charities named as beneficiaries. The Court of Appeals held that the designation "Michigan Cancer Society” is not ambiguous. In light of the particular facts of this case, we disagree. I John W. Kremlick died November 12, 1976, leaving a t

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the court’s result that Plaintiffs have standing to challenge the provisions at issue,1 that the Salt Lake County Clerk, Governor, and Attorney General were proper Defendants, and that the appeal may proceed despite the absence of the Salt Lake County Clerk. I disagree w

417 Mich. 237 (1983) 331 N.W.2d 228 In re KREMLICK ESTATE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, MICHIGAN DIVISION, INC v. SUTTON Docket No. 68124. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided March 25, 1983. Carey & Carey (by Bruce D. Carey) for the petitioners. Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (by Phyllis G. Rozof) f

314 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 (1983) 460 A.2d 1149 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Alphonso LEWIS, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted September 14, 1982. Filed May 6, 1983. Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied August 10, 1983. *301 Marlene Cooperman, Philadelphia, for appel

391 Mass. 869 (1984) 465 N.E.2d 1180 COMMONWEALTH vs. LOUIS PHILIPPE BOURGEOIS (and companion cases[1]). Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Hampden. January 10, 1984. May 16, 1984. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & O'CONNOR, JJ. William T. Walsh, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for the Com

231 A.2d 767 (1967) Thomas Richard KNOTT, Jr. v. Harold V. LANGLOIS, Warden. No. 37-M.P. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 20, 1967. William F. Reilly, Sp. Counsel to Public Defender, Providence, for petitioner. Herbert F. DeSimone, Atty. Gen., Donald P. Ryan, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. OPINION JOSLIN, Justice.

138 A.2d 430 (1958) In re CHARIZIO. No. 1849. Supreme Court of Vermont. Washington. January 7, 1958. *431 Austin B. Noble and William E. Mikell, Burlington, for plaintiff. Frederick M. Reed, Atty. Gen., for defendant. *432 Before CLEARY, ADAMS and HOLDEN, JJ., and SHANGRAW and DIVOLL, Su

Kass, J. Highly competent police work resulted in the arrest and conviction of the defendants of armed robbery while masked of an employee of a bank,2 armed assault with intent to murder,3 attempted murder,4 assault and battery on a police officer,5 and assault

USCA11 Case: 16-10128 Date Filed: 02/16/2022 Page: 1 of 132 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16-10128 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERICKSON MEKO CAMPBELL,

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 25, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUI

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 18, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of

FXLED XN court of Appeals No. 05-18-00868-CV MAR 4 2019 Lisa Matz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C - l e - - r k - - - - ,5th District IN 1'HE COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH ~

671 F.Supp.2d 467 (2009) In re INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION. Master File No. 21 MC 92. United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 5, 2009. *469 Stanley D. Bernstein, Esq., Rebecca M. Katz, Esq., Christian Siebott, Esq., Bernstein Liebhard LLP, Robert A. Wallner, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Safirste

642 F.Supp. 1552 (1986) Daniel deLEIRIS and Betsy deLeiris, individually and as parents and next friends of Sarah deLeiris, a minor; Ellen Weaver-Paquette and Joseph E. Paquette, Jr., individually and as parents and next friends of Jonathan Mason Paquette, a minor; Deborah A. Mycroft and Walter J. Mycroft III, individually and as parents and next friends of Kirstin Ann Mycroft, a minor; Becky Bessette and John Bessette, individually and as parents and ne

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM