Cases

23-721-cv Suluki v. Credit One Bank, NA UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: June 26, 2024 Decided: May 28, 2025) Docket No. 23-721-cv KHALILAH SULUKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ON COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Alan C. Kay, Sr. United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.. .667 FACTUAL BACKGROUND.. .668 STANDARD.. .669 I. Judg

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TIMOTHY A. BLAGG, SR. : G. DANIEL BLAGG, : : Plaintiffs, : K23L-11-007 JJC : v. : : HB2 ALTERNATIVE HOLDINGS, : LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability : Company, :

¶ 1. STARK, P.J. Leroy and Roger Jones (collectively, Jones) appeal an order granting summary judgment to Gemini Capital Group, LLC. Gemini filed the instant lawsuit in attempt to recover a deficiency-judgment against Jones. Jones argues the circuit court improperly granted summary judgment in Gemini's favor because: (1) Gemini failed to establish its ownership of the debt

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WINDSOR I, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N18C-06-115 EMD CCLD ) CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT ) LLC,

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: “Economic reality dictates” that this consumer lawsuit “proceed as a class action or not at all.”’ Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 161, 94 S.Ct. 2140, 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974). By championing the cause of a handful of objectors and their attorneys (who were denied fees below) to decertify the class, the maj

Lawrence J. O'Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff Cedric Taylor's motion to remand and for an order awarding attorneys' fees and costs. On March 7, 2018, Defendant United Road Services ("URS") removed the case to this Court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA"),

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1073 APPVION, INC. RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, by and through GRANT LYON in his capacity as the ESOP Administrative Committee of Appvion, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOUGLAS P. BUTH, et al.,

OPINION AND ORDER STEWART, Magistrate Judge: INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, Kelly Ott, Nancy Luebben, and Benjamin Gesler, filed this class action against defendants for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 USC § 227 et seq., (“TCPA”), by means of a nation-wide telemarketing scheme targeted at U.S. military veterans. Defendant, Mortgage Investors Corpor

Stinson v. Union Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 103-7-18 Oecv (Harris, J., Apr. 1, 2019) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVIS

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER This Memorandum-Decision and Order results from the undersigned’s first foray into sixteen-year-old litigation beginning in 1999 between the parties and unrelated third parties involving several consolidated actions spanning multiple forums. The *18complex history of this epic battle between the parties has been painstakingly documented in prior decis

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PROVIDER COUNTER-DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND JOINDER IN COUNTER-DEFENDANTS MICHAEL OMIDI, M.D. AND JULIAN OMIDI’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED. COUNTERCLAIM [48] MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge , This matter is before the Court on Provider Counter-Defendants’ (“Providers”) Motion to Dis

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL