Cases

07/31/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 25, 2019 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SHALONDA RENEE PETTUS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2017-C-2163 Angelita Blackshear Dalton, Judge ___________________________________

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL

658 F.Supp.2d 1002 (2009) CONSUMER SOLUTIONS REO, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Ruthie B. HILLERY, et al., Defendants. No. C-08-4357 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 26, 2009. *1004 T. Robert Finlay, Jonathan Douglas Fink, Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP, Newport Beach, CA, Charles Frederick Webber, Jana M. Gaffaney,

Rel: January 17, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals

*784ORDER The above docket matter came before the court for a final hearing on March 18, 2003 at 9:00 a.m. Present for the hearing were petitioners Lorena and Victor Williams, and the respondents, Verdie Lee, Jasper, Delores Lee. Having considered the oral arguments, testimony presented and all relevant pleadings, the court enters the following findings and orders in this case:

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Decision and Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Taylor and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives; therefore, the Full Commission affirms the Decision and Order of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters

508 F.Supp. 367 (1981) Ruthie Mae MOTON et al., Plaintiffs, v. A. C. LAMBERT et al., Defendants. No. GC 80-222-WK-O. United States District Court, N. D. Mississippi, Greenville Division. March 6, 1981. *368 Barry H. Powell, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs. W. Dean Belk, Richard G. Noble, Tommie McWilliams, Indianola, Miss.,

549 S.E.2d 95 (2001) 274 Ga. 146 GEORGIA PORTS AUTHORITY v. HARRIS. No. S00G1368. Supreme Court of Georgia. July 2, 2001. Reconsideration Denied July 27, 2001. *96 Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Kathleen M. Pacious, Deputy Atty. Gen., George S. Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ranitz, Mahoney, Cool

732 So.2d 893 (1999) Otis G. McDONALD, Flora McDonald, Robert Mordica, Von Kyle Modica, Robert R. Royals, Judy W. Royals, Vencie Pruitt, Ruthie Mae Pruitt, W.D. Young, William Paul Rowell, Bertie Flowers, Sarah E. Life, Mrs. A.W. Livingston, David Livingston, Elizabeth D. Livingston, Audrey McClellan, Tom McClellan, Cecil McClellan, Jr., E.H. Morgan, John A. Ashley, Jane Carol Ashley, Edna M. Shepard, Janis M. Sumrall, James Thigpen, Katheryn Wheeler, Te

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 97-CA-01336-SCT OTIS G. McDONALD, FLORA McDONALD, ROBERT MORDICA, VON KYLE MODICA, ROBERT R. ROYALS, JUDY W. ROYALS, VENCIE PRUITT, RUTHIE MAE PRUITT, W. D. YOUNG, WILLIAM PAUL ROWELL, BERTIE FLOWERS, SARAH E. LIFE, MRS. A. W. LIVINGSTON, DAVID LIVINGSTON, ELIZABETH D. LIVINGSTON, AUDREY McCLELLAN, TOM McCLELLAN, CECIL McCLELLAN, JR., E. H. MORGAN, JOHN A. ASHLEY, JANE CAROL ASHLEY, EDNA M. SHEPARD, JANIS M. SUM

Ellington, Judge. In Case No. A99A2012, Georgia Ports Authority (GPA) appeals from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict in William N. and Ruthie Mae Harris’ negligence suit under the.Georgia Tort Claims Act (GTCA) for personal injuries suffered while Mr. Harris was working as a longshoreman at the Brunswick port.1 In Case No. A99A2013, the Harrises cross-appeal. The cases are considered tog

414 S.W.2d 100 (1967) 242 Ark. 486 Ruthie Mae BROOKS v. Robert E. WAGE et al. No. 5-4179. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 1, 1967. *101 Howell, Price & Worsham, Little Rock, for appellant. McMillen, Teague, Bramhall & Davis, by Thomas M. Bramhall, Little Rock, for appellees. JONES, Jus

467 F.Supp.2d 466 (2006) In re: COMMUNITY BANK OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA and Guaranty Bank Second Mortgage Litigation Nos. Civ.A.02-1201, Civ.A.03-425, Civ. A.03-1380, Civ.A.05-589, Civ.A.05-590, Civ.A.05-688, Civ.A.05-1386, Civ.A.06-768. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. October 9, 2006. *467 *468

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. Charles R. Barr, Thomas W. Novotny,1 and David R. Reed instituted a class action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 on behalf of “all Illinois residents who voted for the election of a United States Senator [on] November 8, 1966.” The complaint alleged that the defendants, Ruthie Mae Chatman, Betty Jean Bussie, Ruby Roberts, Mattie M. Taylor, and Lillie Ruben,2

397 F.2d 515 Charles R. BARR, and Thomas W. Novotny, individually, andrepresenting the members of the unincorporated associationof Illinois voters, more commonly known as Operation EagleEye, and David R. Reed, individually, on behalf ofthemselves and all other Illinois voters similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Ruthie Mae CHATMAN, Betty Jean Bussie, Ruby Roberts, MattieM. Taylor andLillie Ruben, Defendants-App

FOURNET, Chief Justice. We granted certiorari in this case to •review the judgment of the Court of Ap-peal, First Circuit, dismissing the defendant’s appeal following plaintiff-appellee’s motion to dismiss on the ground that, the .appeal being devolutive, the judgment sought to be appealed has long since become •executory and power to prevent execution thereof has been lost. The suit is one for partition by

OPINION This suit arose out of a series of contracts for the exchange of various properties, which were followed by deeds, except one, which resulted in this contest involving breach of contract, trespass to try title, specific performance, and an intervenor seeking an equitable lien for the balance of the purchase price by his vendee under a deed. Trial was to a jury and resulted in a judgment upholding the breach of contract, denying specific performance establishin

John A. Fogleman, Justice. Anniah Bush contends that we should reverse his conviction of murder in the first degree in the perpetration of arson solely on the ground that the state did not prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty. He is mistaken as to the purpose and scope of appellate review of a criminal judgment. The point asserted here by appellant was resolved by the jury ve

590 So.2d 956 (1991) Franklin DeLOACH, husband, Appellant, v. Ruthie Mae DeLOACH, wife, Appellee. No. 90-3139. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. November 21, 1991. Rehearing Denied January 2, 1992. *957 William H. Grant, III, Orange Park, for appellant. No brief filed for appellee. <

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Anthony Porter was sentenced to death in 1983 for a double murder committed in Chicago in 1982. Porter’s case reached the Illinois Supreme Court on direct appeal in 1986 and on postconvietion review in 1995, but Porter was unsuccessful both times. A federal district court refused to grant Porter a writ of habeas corpus last year, and Porter now appeals th