Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Rutherford v. CRU Building Corporation”
Heartland Academy Community Church v. Waddlepublic domain
317 F.Supp.2d 984 (2004) HEARTLAND ACADEMY COMMUNITY CHURCH, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. Michael WADDLE, et al., Defendant(s). No. 2:01CV00060ERW. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Northern Division. May 11, 2004. *985 *986 *987
Legal Authority to Approve Changes in Use of Property Under Section 414 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1969 T he proposed sale o f property at its fair m arket value in o rder to raise funds to build low and m oderate incom e housing on d ifferent property constitutes a change in the use o f property under section 414 o f the H ousing and U rban D evelopm ent Act o f 1969 and the term s o f the deed o f the 1974 sale o f the property. T he D epartm ent o f H ousing and U
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
McLean v. Piedmont & Arlington Life Ins.public domain
Anderson, J. In July, 1869, Christopher W. McLean, who is plaintiff in error, and was plaintiff in the court below, and sued for the benefit of Eliza W. Bisseíl and J. E. Darrow, obtained from the defendant a policy in the amount of five thousand dollars, assuring the life of Wiley E. Higgins, of North Carolina, for considerations and upon conditions therein expressed, for the term of the said Higgins’ life. This contra
McLean v. Piedmont & Arlington Life Ins.public domain
Anderson, J. In July, 1869, Christopher W. McLean, who is plaintiff in error, and was plaintiff in the court below, and sued for the benefit of Eliza W. Bisseíl and J. E. Darrow, obtained from the defendant a policy in the amount of five thousand dollars, assuring the life of Wiley E. Higgins, of North Carolina, for considerations and upon conditions therein expressed, for the term of the said Higgins’ life. This contra
McLean v. Piedmont & Arlington Life Ins.public domain
Anderson, J. In July, 1869, Christopher W. McLean, who is plaintiff in error, and was plaintiff in the court below, and sued for the benefit of Eliza W. Bisseíl and J. E. Darrow, obtained from the defendant a policy in the amount of five thousand dollars, assuring the life of Wiley E. Higgins, of North Carolina, for considerations and upon conditions therein expressed, for the term of the said Higgins’ life. This contra