Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2786 MICHAEL MEYERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DAVID GOMEZ, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Di

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-3434 ____________ FDRLST MEDIA, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ____________ No. 20-3492 ____________ NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

We granted certiorari sub nom. Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Pauley, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 891 ,

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KNIFE RIGHTS, INC.; ELIOT No. 24-5536 KAAGAN; JIM MILLER; D.C. No. GARRISON HAM; NORTH 3:23-cv-00474- COUNTY SHOOTING CENTER, JES-DDL INC.; PWGG, LP, Southern District

669 A.2d 655 (1995) In the Matter of a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware Arlen MEKLER, Respondent. No. 305, 1994. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: August 15, 1995. Decided: November 27, 1995. Victor F. Battaglia (argued), and David L. Finger, Biggs and Battaglia, Wilmington, for Respondent. David Curtis Glebe, Chief

201 Va. 621 (1960) S. D. MAY, STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER OF VIRGINIA v. BERNARD W. DEWEY, ET AL. Record No. 5048. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 7, 1960. Francis C. Lee, Assistant Attorney General (A. S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General; M. Ray Johnston, Assistant Attorney General; Jesse, Phillips, Klinge & Kendrick, on brief), for the appellant. Jame

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

Civil action to recover land as church property allegedly wrongfully withheld by defendants. Plaintiffs in their complaint and amended complaint allege among other things, in brief, these facts pertinent to this appeal: (1) The Christian Church is a Protestant denomination organized by the Reverend James O'Kelly and his associates in the early days of the colonization of the United States, and is recognized as such among American churches. It has been active in certain sections

TUCKER, Judge. On the present occasion, we are solemnly called on by the appellants, in their bill of complaint, to decide, whether an act of, the general assembly, entitled, *'an act concerning the glebe lands and churches within this commonwealth,” could deprive the protesiant episcopal church in the parish of Manchester (of which they style themselves the vestry and church wardens) of the glebe in that parish, heretofore purch

TUCKER, Judge. On the present occasion, we are solemnly called on by the appellants, in their bill of complaint, to decide, whether an act of, the general assembly, entitled, *'an act concerning the glebe lands and churches within this commonwealth,” could deprive the protesiant episcopal church in the parish of Manchester (of which they style themselves the vestry and church wardens) of the glebe in that parish, heretofore purch

TUCKER, Judge. On the present occasion, we are solemnly called on by the appellants, in their bill of complaint, to decide, whether an act of, the general assembly, entitled, *'an act concerning the glebe lands and churches within this commonwealth,” could deprive the protesiant episcopal church in the parish of Manchester (of which they style themselves the vestry and church wardens) of the glebe in that parish, heretofore purch

Tucker, Judge. On the present occasion, we are solemnly called on by the appellants, in their bill of complaint, to decide, whether an act of the general assembly, entitled, *129“ an act concerning the glebe lands and churches within this commonwealth,” could deprive the protestant episcopal church in the parish of Manchester (of which they style themselves the vestry and