Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ruth Anne Sanchez”
United States v. Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Allen P. Pegg, appointed counsel for Ruben Sanchez, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals n
Commonwealth v. Sanchezpublic domain
Vuono, J. A Superior Court jury convicted the defendant of murder in the second degree and unlawful possession of a firearm. At trial, the defendant admitted that he shot the victim, Jose Portillo, during a street confrontation. He claimed, however, that he acted in self-defense and in defense of his aunt, who had *190intervened in the fight to protect him. The defendant
Matthew Edmonds v. State of Indianapublic domain
May, Judge. Matthew Edmonds appeals his convictions of one count of Level 3 felony resisting law enforcement resulting in the death of another person 1 and two counts of Level 5 felony resisting law enforcement resulting in serious bodily injury to another person.
Ruth Velasquez Bird v. State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion filed June 2, 2011 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals
People v. McCraypublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 260 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 261 OPINION A jury convicted defendant Christopher McCray of selling or transporting a controlled substance
Ruth Velasquez Bird v. State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion filed June 2, 2011 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-09-00293-CR __________ RUTH VELASQUEZ BIRD, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 385th Dis
Martin, Ruth Ann v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ) RUTH ANN MARTIN,
United States v. Daniel Troyapublic domain
WILSON, Circuit Judge: The present appeal arises from the murder of a family on the side of a Florida turnpike that, after a trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, resulted in a sentence of death for Appellants Daniel Troya and Ricardo Sanchez, Jr. (Appellants). Appellants now contest several of the district court’s rulings.
Texarkana Nursing & Healthcare Center, LLC v. Susan Lyle, Independent Guardian of Betty Ruth Vestpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice CARTER. I. Background Betty Ruth Vest was a resident of Tex-arkana Nursing & Healthcare Center, L.L.C. (Texarkana Nursing) from 2003 until September 2011, when she passed *316 away.
United States v. Belmares-Delgadopublic domain
PER CURIAM.* Moisés Belmares-Delgado appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Belmares-Delgado complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Belmares-De
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00768-CV John B. Gordon and Ruth A. Gordon, Appellants v. Randall C. Staudt, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 01-0002-CC1, HONORABLE DONALD HUMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDU
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00768-CV John B. Gordon and Ruth A. Gordon, Appellants v. <
United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varonpublic domain
175 F.3d 930 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 837 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Isabel Rodriguez DE VARON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-5421. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. May 14, 1999. Kathleen M. Williams, Federal Public Defender, Faith Mesnekoff, Assis
NUMBER 13-04-573-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG </
Lewis, Charles and Crowder, Ruth v. Marina Bay Trucks, Inc and Sterling Financial Group, LLCpublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27, 2007 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27, 2007. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals<
NO. 12-09-00271-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DOROTHY HARRIS a/k/a RUTH § APPEAL FROM THE 294TH ARMSTRONG HARRIS, APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT O. B. WATSON, HERBERT GILLIAM, RUBY INEZ SLATON, AND SHIRLEY JEAN PATTE
NO. 12-09-00271-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Sanchezpublic domain
Appellee, Julio Sanchez, Jr. (Sanchez), was arrested in Lubbock County on July 27, 1988, for driving while intoxicated. He refused to take a breath test or offer a blood sample. In compliance with Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6701l-5(2)(d) (Vernon Supp. 1989),1 the arresting officer reported that refusal to appellant, Texas Department of Public Safety (the Department). Upon receipt of that report, the Department sent Sanchez a
JOSE GOMEZ v. SIDNEY FRADINpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JOSE GOMEZ, LUCRECIA CARO, SUSAN A. CHIODO, RUTH ANN HINDS, WINIFRED FRANCOIS, HILDA GLASSMAN, MARGARITA GUERRA, MARCOS A. GUZMAN, CLAUDIA KRYSIAK, ANNETTE PUGLIESE, PEDRO E. RAMIREZ SANCHEZ and WILLIAM WOODWARD, Appellants, v. SIDNEY FRADIN, HERMAN WEISS, ALEXANDER HIRSCH, JOHN C. NUSS and L
Gomez v. Fradinpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, challenge the trial court’s order denying a motion to substitute parties pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(a), after one of the defendants died. Specifically,, the appellants sought to have the trial court appoint a representative of the decedent in this proceeding for breach of fiduciary duty because no estate had been opened for the deceased. The tria