Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rusty Russ”
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Russ Hardenburgh, Inc.public domain
982 F.Supp. 503 (1997) PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. RUSS HARDENBURGH, INC., Defendant. No. 1:93 CV 0546. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. November 25, 1997. *504 Daniel F. Gourash, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Cleveland, OH, David P. Peterson, Douglas Hancock, John D. Vandenberg, Klar
Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Comipublic domain
233 F.Supp.2d 388 (2002) OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS INC., Plaintiff, v. Richard COMI; Comi Telecommunications; Lawrence Monroe aka Rusty Monroe; and Monroe Telcom Associates, LLC, Defendants. No. 1:99-CV-1952 (RFT). United States District Court, N.D. New York. November 20, 2002. *389 Hodgson Russ LLP, Buffalo, NY (Daniel A. Spitzer
Hart v. Moorepublic domain
952 S.W.2d 90 (1997) Glenn HART, an Individual, Joyce Hart, an Individual, Rusty Acres, Inc., a Texas Corporation, and Ceres Corporation, a Texas Corporation, Appellants, v. Gavin MOORE, an Individual, Appellee. No. 07-96-0014-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. August 5, 1997. Rehearing Overruled October 2, 1997.
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rohdepublic domain
OPINION GILDEA, Chief Justice. In this subrogation action, appellant RAM Mutual Insurance Company seeks to *4recover payment it made to its insured for the repair of water damage allegedly caused by the negligence of respondent Rusty Rohde, the commercial tenant of RAM’s insured. The district court granted Rohde’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing RAM
Murphy v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurancepublic domain
788 F.Supp.2d 332 (2011) Dan MURPHY and Wendy Linnington, Plaintiffs, v. ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. File No. 1:09-cv-229-jgm. United States District Court, D. Vermont. March 15, 2011. *333 Frank H. Langrock, Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP, Middlebury, VT, for Plaintiffs. Harry R. Ryan, III, Ryan Sm
Carroll Shelby Licensing, Inc. v. Halickipublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CARROLL SHELBY LICENSING, No. 23-3731 INC., a California corporation; D.C. No. CARROLL HALL SHELBY 8:20-cv-01344- TRUST, MCS-DFM Plaintiff-ctr-defendants - Appellees, OPINION v. DENICE SHAKARIAN HALICKI,
Steven Smith v. Crounse Corporationpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1303 STEVEN R. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROUNSE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis
Madsen v. Beacon Roofing Supplypublic domain
2024 UT App 177 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS RUSS MADSEN, MANDY MADSEN, ANGIE WALL, SOFIA BOWERS, AND MICHAEL BOWERS, Appellees, v. BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY, BEACON SALES ACQUISITION INC., AND RUSTY CADE COPE, Appellants. Opinion No. 20230392-CA Filed December 5, 2024
Miller v. Cloutpublic domain
| THIBODEAUX, Judge. In this personal injury case involving a rear-end vehicular collision where liability for causing the accident was stipulated, the plaintiff, Iris Miller, who was sixty-three years old at the time of trial, appeals the judgment of the trial court pursuant to a jury verdict. Ms. Miller contends the jury abused its discretion by failing to award the full amount of her past medical expenses of $17,689.37 as
Am. Land Invs., Ltd. v. Allstate Ins. Co.public domain
THOMAS M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants Allstate Insurance Company has moved the Court for entry of summary judgment on Plaintiff American Land Investments, Ltd.'s claims of breach of contract and lack of good faith under Ohio common law. (ECF 37) Because the motion is well-taken, it will be granted. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff American Land Investmen
Goode, Steven Michaelpublic domain
PD-1014-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/31/2015 6:23:45 PM Accepted 9/1/2015 12:46:05 PM
People v. Mecanopublic domain
Opinion ALDRICH, J. INTRODUCTION A jury found defendant and appellant Russell Mecano, a police officer, guilty of solicitation of prostitution, sexual battery by restraint, sexual penetration by force or duress, and sexual penetration under threat by a public official. In the published portion of this opinion, we consider and reject Mecano’s contention that because he never explicitly reques
James Cleveland v. Rob Taylorpublic domain
OPINION EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice. Appellees, Robert G. Taylor II, Joseph F. Archer, Claiborne Bruce, Allam Alshay-eb, Russ Himel, Raymond Chachere, Dennis McLaughlin, Dale Gorman, Louay Jou-barani, Seman Matta, and Carlo Congelosi (collectively, “the Investors”), sued appellants, James R. Cleveland, Paul R. Cleveland, Kellie L. Dorman, Nicos Energy, LLC,
Premier Pools Mgmt. Corp. v. Colony Ins. Co.public domain
JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Premier Pools Management Corp. ("Plaintiff") brings this lawsuit against Defendant Colony Insurance Company ("Defendant") alleging that Defendant breached the parties' insurance agreement by declining to defend Plaintiff in a lawsuit brought against it by Premier Pools, Inc. ("PPI") in Texas state court (the "Texas Case"). See Second Ame
4 So.3d 854 (2008) SPINE DIAGNOSTICS CENTER OF BATON ROUGE, INC. v. LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF NURSING through LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS, and August J. Rantz, III. No. 2008 CA 0813. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 23, 2008. *856 John P. Wolfe, III, Chad A. Sullivan, Tiffany N. Thornton, Mich
McGonagil v. Treadwellpublic domain
216 Ga. App. 850 (1995) McGONAGIL et al. v. TREADWELL et al. A95A0429. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 10, 1995. Reconsideration Denied March 24, 1995. *855 Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, Timothy C. Batten, for appellants. Brewer & Associates, Deedra M. Brewer, Jason A. Golden,
Findlay/Hancock County Bar Ass'n v. Filkinspublic domain
Lundberg Stratton, J. “In disciplinary proceedings, the relator bears the burden of proving the facts necessary to establish a violation. The complaint must allege the specific misconduct that violates the Disciplinary Rules and relator must prove such misconduct by clear and convincing evidence.” (Emphasis added.) Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Reid (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 327, 708 N.E.2d 193, at paragraph two of the syl
Findlay/Hancock Cty. Bar Assn. v. Filkinspublic domain
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 1.] FINDLAY/HANCOCK COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FILKINS. [Cite as Findlay/Hancock Cty. Bar Assn. v. Filkins, 2000-Ohio-491.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Charges against attorney dismissed when relator fails to prove alleged disciplinary violations by clear and convincing evidence. (No. 99-2233—Submitted March 8, 2000—Decided September 6, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board o
United States v. Viezcapublic domain
(2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Juan Ubaldo VIEZCA. No. 2:07-cr-139-WKW. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. April 22, 2008. ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, District Judge. On March 19, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 101) that defendant Ubaldo-Viezca's motions to suppress (Docs.# # 42, 8
Tony A. Makoka v. Statepublic domain
FILED IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 15, 1997 APRIL 1997 SESSION Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk TONY A. MAKOKA, ) ) Appellant, )