Cases

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Ray Russell, Angelo Rainaldi, John Gu-lick and Edward Hess appeal from that *40part of the district court’s judgment dismissing their claims that Westchester County’s plumber licensing scheme denied them their du

Palmer, J. The dispositive question in this case is whether the plaintiff, the county of Westchester of the state of New York, has acquired an air navigation (avigation) easement1 by prescription over certain Connecticut property under the laws of this state. This and other questions2 come to this court upon our grant of certification from the United States Court of Appea

Sander v Westchester Reform Temple (2024 NY Slip Op 03064) Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

Matter of Testani v Russell & Russell, LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 02592) Matter of Testani v Russell & Russell, LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 02592 Decided on April 21, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Repor

696 F.Supp.2d 213 (2010) Daniel RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Nassau County Commission of Human Rights, Todd Goldfarb, in his individual and official capacity, Director of Personnel of Nassau County Commission on Human Rights, Nassau County Civil Service Commission, Karle Kampe, in his individual and official capacity, Commissioner of Nassau County Civil Service Commission, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1686 (DR

PRESIDING JUSTICE REYES delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. ¶ 1 Defendant-appellant Giant Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Giant Manufacturing), a Taiwanese corporation, brings this appeal under *810 Illinois Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(3) from an order of the circuit court of Cook

74 F.Supp.2d 349 (1999) Ray RUSSELL, Angelo Rainaldi, John Gulic, and Edward Hess, Plaintiffs, v. THE BOARD OF PLUMBING EXAMINERS OF THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER and the County of Westchester, Defendants. No. 98 CIV. 0725 CLB. United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 16, 1999. Kim Berg, Lovett & Gould, White Plains, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Russell v River Manor Corp. (2023 NY Slip Op 02547) Russell v River Manor Corp. 2023 NY Slip Op 02547 Decided on May 10, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

74 F.Supp.2d 339 (1999) Ray RUSSELL, Angelo Rainaldi, John Gulick, and Edward Hess, Plaintiffs, THE BOARD OF PLUMBING EXAMINERS OF THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER and THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, Defendants. No. 98 CIV. 0725 CLB. United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 28, 1999. *340 Kim Berg, Lovett & Gould, White Plains,

Matter of Walsh v Russell (2023 NY Slip Op 01522) Matter of Walsh v Russell 2023 NY Slip Op 01522 Decided on March 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

People ex rel. Kielly v Russell (2025 NY Slip Op 02599) People ex rel. Kielly v Russell 2025 NY Slip Op 02599 Decided on April 30, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic

485 F.Supp.2d 424 (2007) Candida COSTABILE, as Guardian Ad Litem For Anthony Costabile, and Anthony Costabile, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, NEW YORK, Frank Bonfonte, Roy Shapiro and Roberto Alancarta, Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 3329(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 25, 2007. *425

2023 Westchester Assoc., LLC v Ben Ave, LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 00482) 2023 Westchester Assoc., LLC v Ben Ave, LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 00482 Decided on January 28, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New Yor

In an action, *888 inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J.), dated December 19, 2014, which, inter alia, denied his motion for leave to renew and reargue his opposition to that branch of the prior motion of the defendants Robert Rus

979 F.Supp. 989 (1997) Richard L. FINCHER, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, the Village of Ossining, Victor Cruz, Daniel J. Slater, Randy Jefferson, Richard Lint, Thomas Reddy, Jack Keegan, Patrolman Foley, Officer Diego, Lieutenant Peabody, Lieutenant Sullivan, Sgt. John Greenan, Robert Mione and Susan Utsch, Defendants. No. 93 CIV. 1844(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York.</

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J.), dated March 19, 2013, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Robert Russell and Lisa Russell which was pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is

160 F.Supp.2d 570 (2001) Herbert HART, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant. No. 98 Civ. 8034(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 30, 2001. *571 *572 Herbert Hart, New York City, NY, pro se. Cedric Taylor, Coalition for the Homel

*650This action arises out of widespread media coverage concerning an essay authored by the plaintiff, James C. Russell, that came to light during his unsuccessful 2010 Congressional campaign. At the time the controversy arose, Russell was running as the Republican nominee in the 2010 election for the New York 18th Congressional District seat in the United States House of Representatives. His campa

*650This action arises out of widespread media coverage concerning an essay authored by the plaintiff, James C. Russell, that came to light during his unsuccessful 2010 Congressional campaign. At the time the controversy arose, Russell was running as the Republican nominee in the 2010 election for the New York 18th Congressional District seat in the United States House of Representatives. His campa

OPINION OF THE COURT McCarthy, J. On this appeal, we are presented with the principal question of whether a plaintiff may include, directly on the authorizations he or she provides to nonparty treating physicians in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 USC § 1320d et seq.; hereinafter HIPAA), a statement that the purpose of an informal, ex parte interv