Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Russell William Rice”
State v. Russellpublic domain
206 P.3d 219 (2009) 227 Or. App. 295 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Christopher Lee RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant. 200314609; A123638. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on remand October 29, 2008. Decided April 8, 2009. *220 Anne Fujita Munsey, Senior Deputy Public Defender,
Grove Hill Homeowners' Ass'n v. Ricepublic domain
BRYAN, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Grove Hill Homeowners’ Association, Inc. (“the Association”), sought a permanent injunction enjoining William Rice and Laura Rice from maintaining a driveway in violation of restrictive covenants. In our opinion in the first appeal in this case, this court recited the standard for issuing a permanent injunction: “ ‘To be entitled to a
Grove Hill Homeowners' Ass'n v. Ricepublic domain
Grove Hill Homeowners' Association, Inc. ("the Association"), appeals from a judgment entered by the Lee Circuit Court denying the Association's request for a permanent injunction requiring William Rice and Laura Rice to remodel their driveway to comply with § 6.20 of the Grove Hill Subdivision Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions ("the restrictive covenants"). In 2008, the Rices purchased property and a house located in the Grove Hill subdivision. On April 23
Russell v. Russellpublic domain
This case involves post-divorce proceedings. The wife filed for divorce in February 1990, which was granted in May 1990. Incorporated into the divorce decree was a document submitted by the wife that purported to be an agreement of the parties. The husband filed a motion for relief from the judgment alleging, inter alia, that he did not agree with the terms of the agreement and had notified the wife's attorney of such before the entry of the divorce decree. Following an ore ten
Russell v. Flathead Countypublic domain
JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Appellant William Russell (Russell) appeals from the orders of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, in favor of Respondent Flathead County, enjoining Russell’s use of his property as violative of the County’s zoning regulations. We affirm. ¶2 The following issues are presented on appeal: ¶3 1. Did the Distr
Rice v. Englishpublic domain
835 So.2d 157 (2002) John W. RICE et al. v. Bill ENGLISH et al. 1010968. Supreme Court of Alabama. May 24, 2002. *158 Mark G. Montiel, Montgomery, for appellants. Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and John J. Park, asst. atty. gen., for appellees Bill English, Gloria Sinclair, Albert O. Howard, Alfonza Menefee, Johnny H. Williamson,
Rice v. Strunkpublic domain
670 N.E.2d 1280 (1996) Donald G. RICE and Jacqueline Rice, Appellants, v. T. Russell STRUNK, Jr., Thomas Gallmeyer, Rothberg, Gallmeyer, Fruechtenicht & Logan, and Indiana partnership, Appellees. No. 57S03-9504-CV-428. Supreme Court of Indiana. August 6, 1996. *1282 John Muller, Timothy J. Kennedy, Miller, Muller, Mendelson &
In re Ricepublic domain
ORDER CADDELL, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on confirmation of the Third Amended Plan of Reorganization filed by the debtor. Objections to the proposed plan were filed by Citizens Bank & Savings, White and Son Enterprises, Inc., and the trustee, Jan Eberhardt. The hearing in this matter was held on the 21st day of July, 1994. From the evidence presented
Russell Corp. v. Sara Lee Corp.public domain
129 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2001) RUSSELL CORP., Plaintiff, v. SARA LEE CORP. and Saramar LLC, Defendants. No. 00 C 6329. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 23, 2001. *1166 Kevin Michael Forde, Kevin R. Malloy, Kevin M. Forde, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Allen H. Gerstein, Thomas L. Duston, Robert Michael Gerst
Rice v. Paladin Enterprises, Inc.public domain
Reversed and remanded by published opinion.' Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judges WILKINS and WILLIAMS joined. ' OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: To Those Who Think, To Those Who Do, To Those Who Suc
William Pender v. Bank of America Corporationpublic domain
Reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge FLOYD joined. WYNN, Circuit Judge: In this Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) case, an employer was deemed to have wrongly transferred assets from a pension plan that enjoyed a separate account feature to
State v. Ricepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Rice, 2021-Ohio-988.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee
360 Reclaim v. Russellpublic domain
12/27/2023 DA 22-0670 Case Number: DA 22-0670 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2023 MT 250 360 RECLAIM, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIAM M. RUSSELL, an individual, and MOUN
Rice v. Downspublic domain
Opinion LUI, J. William E. Rice and others 1 sued Attorney Gary P. Downs for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of a written agreement Downs drafted to govern a limited liability corporation he formed with Rice and others. The trial court ordered Rice to arbitrate all of
Poe v. Ricepublic domain
706 S.W.2d 5 (1986) Clara POE, Executrix of the Estate of Patricia A. Hopkins and Richard A. Hopkins, Appellant, v. Russell R. RICE, M.D., and Solomon, Oldham Bryant & Hollinsworth, a Partnership and/or Professional Service Corporation, Appellees. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. February 21, 1986. J.L. Richardson III, Louisville, for appellant. William Bowman, James G. Appl
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Russellpublic domain
269 Kan. 228 (2000) 5 P.3d 525 KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Appellant, v. MICHAEL K. RUSSELL, et al., Defendants, and LINDE THOMSON LANGWORTHY KOHN & VAN DYKE, P.C., and THOMAS W. VAN DYKE, Appellees. No. 83,130. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 28, 2000. Frank M. Rice, of Schroer, Rice, P.A., of Topeka, a
Rice v. Steelepublic domain
295 S.W.3d 453 (2009) Sonia L. RICE, Appellant, v. David R. STEELE, Administrator with will Annexed of the Estate of Dorothy Stephens, Deceased, Appellee. and David R. Steele, Administrator with will Annexed of the Estate of Dorothy Stephens, Deceased, Cross-Appellant, v. Sonia L. Rice; Bobby Lee Vance; and James Everett Rice, Jr., Cross-Appellees. Nos. 2008-CA-000308-MR, 2008-CA-000332-MR.
Rice v. Downspublic domain
Filed 6/23/16 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE WILLIAM E. RICE, B261860 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC506921)
Rice v. Jaskolskipublic domain
412 Mich. 206 (1981) 313 N.W.2d 893 RICE v. JASKOLSKI Docket No. 64660, (Calendar No. 10). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued May 6, 1981. Decided December 21, 1981. Joseph G. Aprea for plaintiffs. Lee H. Wulfmeier and Stephen A. Schaefer for defendants. Amicus Curiae: Kerr, Russell
Sandra Silverstein v. William Ricepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 25, 2000 Session SANDRA E. RICE SILVERSTEIN v. WILLIAM RUSSELL RICE, JR. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 31263 George R. Ellis, Chancellor No. W1999-01336-COA-R3-CV - Filed October 20, 2000 This is a suit to enforce a past child support obligation.