Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-96-00702-CV Russell Harris, Appellant v. Dennis J. Moore d/b/a Moore's Trucking , Appellee

Evans, C. J. This is 'an action for wrongful death arising out of an automobile collision that occurred in the state of Oregon. The parties are residents of the state of Washington. Defendant, as administratrix of the estate of her late husband, Clayton Cochran, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, as executrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Frank Russell.

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed August 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00940-CV IN RE THE GUARDIANSHIP OF SAMUEL ALLEN MASCORRO, JR., AN INCAPACITATED PERSON On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-20

PER CURIAM: The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the District Court, entitled Amended Memorandum and Order, 56 F.R.D. 370.

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: Appellant Monsanto Company has filed a motion requesting this court to determine whether any final appealable judgment has been entered in this cause. After due consideration, we find that no final order has yet been entered. The original action in this case has grown into a complex, multiparty affair and has been dragging through the district court since 1966. Basically it

CAROL M. HANSEN, C.J., dissenting: T1 Attorney fees are not available under § 936 in equitable matters. Puckett v. Cornelson, 1995 OK CIV APP, 72, 897 P.2d 1154, 1157. This action is equitable in nature (law of the case appeal No. 93,856). Thus, attorney fees are not available in this action. I therefore dissent. {2 Without explanation, the majority declares it irrelevant to the determinati

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-13-00244-CR BRANDON WAYNE EVANS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 42,993-B Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by e-mail at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

HICKS, J. The defendant, Katherine Saintil-Brown, appeals her convictions by a jury in Superior Court (Delker, J.) for negligent homicide, see RSA 630:3 (2016), criminal neglect of an elderly adult, see RSA 631:8 (2016) (amended 2016), and failure to report adult abuse, see RSA 161-F:46 (2014) (amended 2016), :50 (2014). The defendant's convictions were based upon her failure to call for help whil

548 Argued and submitted August 14, 2018, affirmed June 10, 2020 KIERIN NICHOLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rob PERSSON, Superintendent, Coffee Creek Correctional Facility, Defendant-Respondent. Washington County Circuit Court C150810CV;

110 P.3d 560 (2004) 1970 OK 169 2005 OK CIV APP 12 BIRD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant/Counter-Appellee, v. OKLAHOMA CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant/Appellee/Counter-Appellant. No. 98,703. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. September 7, 2004. Certiorari Denied February 7, 2005.<

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 10, 2009 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSEPH POLLARD Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 06-04223 John P. Colton, Jr., Judge No. W2008-02436-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 11, 2010 A Shelby County jury found the defendant, Joseph Pollard, guilty of first degree murder, a

The opinion of the court was delivered by Lockett, J.: The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s apportionment of the death taxes and administration expenses between the Joyce Evans Pickrell Trust and the Estate of Joyce Evans Pickrell. In re Estate of Pickrell, 14 Kan. App. 2d 375, 791 P.2d 41 (1990). Thomas Pickrell and Patricia Pickrell, son and daughter-in-law of Joyce Evans Pickrell, decease

929 F.Supp. 1193 (1996) Lisa BURROW, a Minor, By and Through her Guardian Ad Litem, Next Best Friends and Parents, David BURROW and Jane Burrow, David Burrow, Individually, and Jane Burrow, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. POSTVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. No. C94-1031. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division. June 17, 1996.

BocKes, J.: There was no dispute as to the general facts of the case. That there was an agreement between the parties for the purchase and sale of the lumber was admitted by both, and its terms were given by them alike except, perhaps, as to the single point of delivery. The contract was made in the spring of 1872. The defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff eleven dollars per thousand for all the good lumber, and five dollars fif

71 Wn. App. 345 (1993) 860 P.2d 1046 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RAMON EVAN BLAND, Appellant. No. 27203-9-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. September 27, 1993. *347 Kevin R. Cole of Washington Appellate Defender Association and Theresa Doyle, for appellan

249 F.3d 921 (9th Cir. 2001) DAWN CASE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,v.KITSAP COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; KITSAP COUNTY; KITSAP COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE; OFFICER LAFRANCE, A KITSAP COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT POLICE OFFICER; DEPUTY BALL, A KITSAP SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OFFICER; DEPUTY BERGENSON, A KITSAP COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OFFICER; DEPUTY BURROWS, A KITSAP COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OFFICER AND JOHN DOE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority holds that county sheriffs may forcibly enter a home, search, and make a warrantless arrest simply because an out-of-state warrant is listed in a federal computer database. Until today, we have held that officers may consider out-of-state computer information as one element in the determination of probable cause, but we have never held that such information sat

GRESHAM, District Judge. The insurance company insists that, although on its face there was no objection to the mortgage, yet it was void, because there was a verbal agreement between Gibson and Burrows that the latter should continue his business just as he had done before, disposing of the mortgaged property for his own benefit. This was denied by Gibson, and the special master to whom this question of fact was referred, report

The most important question to be determined in this case relates to the single point whether there was a delivery of the lumber in dispute to the defendant. By the contract, which was entered into in the spring of 1872, the defendant was to pay the price agreed upon for all the good and culled lumber which the plaintiff should deliver at Travis' Eddy, on the bank of the Delaware river, prior to the first rafting freshet in the sprig of 1873. The delivery was commenced in the early part of De