Cases

61 F.Supp.2d 1196 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Marvin G. SCHWAB, Daniel A. Schwab, and Vance S. Schwab, Defendants. No. 98-CR-076-J. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. July 28, 1999. *1197 *1198 Robert B. Carroll, Cheyenne, WY, for Marvin G. Schwab, defendant. G

Affirmed from the bench.

OPINION MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, Chief Judge. On April 5, 2009, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Motion to Certify Class (#47). Defendant Wexford Corporation filed its Response (# 61) on May 1, 2009. Defendants Willard O. Elyea and Michael Puisis filed their Response (# 76) on June 22, 2009. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion to Certify Class (#47) is DENIED. BACKGROUND

Complaint is made of the opinion that we did not treat the contention that the deed is not evidence that the sale occurred as it is not of anything else recited in it. We did refer to the fact that the deed is not evidence of the historical facts recited in it, but did not think it necessary to assume that this did not refer to the sale itself without which there could be no deed. Every deed must inherently be evidence of a sale or it is nothing. We are in this connection cited to a sheriff's

669 N.E.2d 1211 (1996) 283 Ill. App.3d 376 218 Ill.Dec. 685 GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russell E. JUHL, Thomas E. Juhl, Gary K. Flatt, and Sharon Flatt, Defendants-Appellees. No. 4-95-0999. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. Argued July 16, 1996. Decided

Opinion by Mr. Justice Gbeen, This is an action to recover money alleged to be in the hands of the defendant, but belonging to the plaintiff’s intestate at the time of his death. It is not an action upon a written instrument of any kind. The testimony to show that the defendant had money in his hands belonging to the plaintiff’s intestate was entirely and exclusively in parol. ■ In order to understand the case at

This is a suit on a policy of fire insurance, in which the principal defense was fraud and false swearing in making the proofs as stipulated in a clause in the policy. The pleas which set up such defense allege that plaintiff made the statements, with intent to deceive. This is in recognition of the principle that such intent is a prerequisite to a plea of that sort. The statement is made in many authorities that such intent is a necessary element of the defense. 29 Am.Jur. 849, 850, &

576 P.2d 376 (1978) 33 Or.App. 153 In the matter of the Compensation of Matthew T. RUSSELL, Claimant, Respondent, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Appellant. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on remand February 14, 1978. Decided March 13, 1978. Kevin L. Mannix, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brie

488 P.2d 804 (1971) Roger Allen BROOKS, Appellant, v. Hoyt C. CUPP, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent. Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 1. Submitted on Briefs July 30, 1971. Decided September 21, 1971. Rehearing Denied September 30, 1971. Review Denied November 3, 1971. Roger Allen Brooks, in pro. per.

303 B.R. 119 (2003) In re DATAVON, INC., Debtors. No. 02-38600-SAF-11. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. October 17, 2003. *120 *121 David M. Bennett, Thompson and Knight, Dallas, Robert G. Cass, Tulsa, OK, John Mark Chevallier, McGuire, Craddock and Strother, Dallas, Joseph F

SCHWAB, C. J. This appeal presents the question of whether, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, a workman who suffers a hernia in the course of his employment and has it surgically repaired is restricted to the benefits provided by ORS 656.220, even though the surgery leaves him with a residual permanent disability. We agree with the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the trial court that absent complications he is so restrict

AYERY, P. J. (W.S.) (dissenting). This is a suit from Part II of the Chancery Court of Shelby County, Honorable Ceylon B. Frazer, Chancellor, in which the original complainant, Rudolph Y. Russell, filed a bill in Chancery Court styled “Original Bill To Enjoin and Cancel Promissory Note”. After the prayer for process, which waives oath to answer, the original bill' prayed as follows:

FOLEY, J. This is an appeal by SAIF from a circuit court judgment affirming the orders of the hearing officer and the Workmen’s Compensation Board that the Fund accept claimant’s claim as compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Claimant sustained a heart attack (myocardial infarction) on September 14, 1972, which the hearing officer, Board and trial court found to be work-connected. The State Ac

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHNSTON GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge. Before the Court for consideration is the Amended Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 28) of the Honorable Robert J. Johnston, United States Magistrate Judge, entered October 26, 2012. No objections have been filed. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in ac

Opinion issued April 25, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00893-CV ——————————— IN RE TROY LEE CHRISTENSEN, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

Chambers, J. ¶1 Michael Williams drove away from a Les Schwab dealership without paying for his new tires and wheels. An employee called the police, and officers tracked down Williams at his girl friend’s home. Williams admitted to the officer he had driven away without paying but gave his brother’s name instead of his own, apparently to avoid discovery of an outstanding warrant for a community custody violation. Williams was con

KEATY, Judge. *1046The Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District (the District) appeals a judgment granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Vernon Christopher Meyer and Carla Michelle Meyer (the Meyers) and barring the District from expropriating a tract of their property in Westlake, Louisiana. For the following reasons, we affirm.</

20-3626 (L) Laydon v. Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A., et al. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2021 Argued: May 24, 2022 Decided: October 18, 2022 Amended: December 8, 2022 Nos. 20-3626(L), 20-3775(XAP) JEFFREY LAYDON, on behalf of himself and all others similarl

McCALEB, Justice. Plaintiff, Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc., a Louisiana corporation holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity as a common carrier of general commodities within the southeastern section of Louisiana, instituted this suit against the Louisiana Public Service Commission seeking annulment of the Commission’s Order No. 8903. This order granted to Earl Guillory, doing business as Ozone Motor Line and