Cases

18 Cal.Rptr.3d 700 (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 520 Ernie RUIZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SYSCO FOOD SERVICES, Defendant and Appellant. No. D041833. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. September 8, 2004. Review Denied January 19, 2005. *702 Mark T. Bennett, Merrill, Schultz &

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 10-410V (To be Published) ************************* * Special Master Corcoran SHEELA BLACKBURN, * *

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MELISSA BELGAU; DONNA BYBEE; No. 19-35137 MICHAEL STONE; RICHARD OSTRANDER; MIRIAM TORRESPL; D.C. No. KATHERINE NEWMAN; GARY HONC, 3:18-cv-05620- Plaintiffs-Appellants, RJB v. OPINION JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Washington; DAVID SCHUMACHER,

NUMBER 13-24-00414-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE CONNIE COBB AS A SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Opinion by Justice Peña1

Opinion BOREN, P. J. Plaintiff and respondent Mario Garrido entered into an agreement with his employer, defendant and appellant Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP (Air Liquide). The agreement provided that all disputes arising out of Garrido’s employment with Air Liquide would be resolved by arbitration, and the agreement prohibited class arbitration.

NUMBER 13-21-00168-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG DORA GUZMAN, NORMA CADRIEL HERNANDEZ, AND RUBI MORENO, Appellants, v. LOUIS SOROLA, Appellee. On appeal from the 197th District Court

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00053-CV ___________________________ J. CURT LUCAS AND INVENIAS PARTNERS LLC, Appellants V. CY

Filed 8/16/12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA PINNACLE MUSEUM TOWER ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S186149 v. ) ) Ct.App. 4/1 D055422 PINNACLE MARKET DEVELOPMENT ) (US), LLC, et al. )

176 Cal.App.4th 93 (2009) COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. A120667. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four. July 30, 2009. *100 Hadsell, Stormer, Keeny, Richardson & Renick, Dan Stormer, Virginia Ke

41 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 1118 A.F. BROWN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RHINO ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. G035694. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three. February 21, 2006. As Modified March 23, 2006. *4

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Defendants, the Welk Group, Inc., Welk Resort Group, Inc., Welk Music Group, Inc., and Soleil Communications, Inc., (collectively, “Defendants”), motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative partial summary judgment.1 [Doc. No. 128.] Plaintiff fil

Opinion CHIN, J. We granted review to determine whether a city employee must exhaust both the administrative remedy that the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code,1 § 12900 et seq.) (FEHA) provides and the *1080internal remedy that a city charter requires be

877 S.W.2d 774 (1994) Gary J. HILL, Appellant, v. The HERALD-POST PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., Scripps Howard Company, Inc., and Arvel (Rod) Ponton, III, Appellees. No. 08-92-00418-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. February 16, 1994. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1994. *776 Michael R. "Mickey" Milligan, El Paso,

900 S.W.2d 425 (1995) KERRVILLE STATE HOSPITAL, Appellant, v. James O. CLARK and Genevie Clark, Appellees. No. 03-93-00645-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. May 31, 1995. Rehearing Overruled July 12, 1995. *429 Dan Morales, Atty. Gen., Mike Thompson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tort Litigation Div., Austin, for a

718 F.Supp.2d 382 (2010) MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 11614(JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 16, 2010. *386 Andre K. Cizmarik, Anthony Joseph Viola, Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Daniel Eric Shaw, Jonathan Lee Hochman, S

Filed 12/19/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE In re WALTER CHUNN III, A162583 on Habeas Corpus. (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FCR319528) For many years, the Department of State Hospitals (

KERRVILLE TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-93-00645-CV Kerrville State Hospital, Appellant

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. (CST) and Sanford M. Stevenson seek compensation from the government, under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), for unlawful use of two of their patents. The patents at issue are U.S. Patent No. 5,370,800 (the 800 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 4,749,497 (the 497 patent), both of which relate to the treatment of waste water and are used in a device marketed by CS

642 F.Supp. 393 (1985) SAVE OUR DUNES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Leigh PEGUES, etc., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 84-T-518-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, N.D. December 17, 1985. *394 *395 *396 L. Gilbert Kendrick, Montgomery, Ala., Frederick

339 F.Supp.2d 202 (2004) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INC. and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 97-10814-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 15, 2004. *203 *204 *205