Cases

455 B.R. 745 (2011) In re Jose L. RUIZ, also known as Joe Ruiz, and Carrie Ruiz, also known as Carrie Lee Ruiz, Debtors. Gary E. Jubber, Trustee, Appellant, v. Jose L. Ruiz and Carrie Ruiz, Appellees. BAP No. UT-10-069. Bankruptcy No. 10-25368. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit. August 17, 2011. *746

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge: The English language contains many examples of homonyms-"words that have the same sound and often the same spelling but differ in meaning ...." The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 843 (5th ed. 2011). The words "letter" (a symbol in the alphabet or a note) and "bark" (a dog's cry or the outside covering of a tree trunk), for example, both fit the bill (as does "bill," for that matter).

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner-Appellant Fabian Ruiz appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Frederick Block, Judge), dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We granted a certificate of appealability as to whether (1) petitioner was proeedurally *691barred from raising an ineffective

25-1019 Öztürk v. Hyde United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2024 Argued: May 6, 2025 Decided: May 7, 2025 No. 25-1019 _____________________________________ RUMEYSA OZTURK,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-9009 IN RE: LUIS MANUEL RUIZ RUIZ, d/b/a Lowy Farm, Debtor, MILK INDUSTRY REGULATORY OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, a/k/a ORIL, Appellant, v. LUIS MANUEL RUIZ RUIZ, d/b/a Lowy Farm, Appellee. APP

25-1019; 25-1113 Öztürk v. Hyde; Mahdawi v. Trump UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 19th day of September, two thousand twenty-five. Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by E-mail at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

DALIANIS, C.J. **555 The defendant, Felix Ruiz, appeals his conviction by a jury of misdemeanor receipt of stolen property; namely, a United States passport belonging to an African-American woman named "Cecilia Francis Riley." See RSA 637:7 (2016). On appeal, he argues th

ACCEPTED 03-14-00710-CV 3745407 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

SUTIN, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with Point II of the majority opinion on strict liability and otherwise I dissent. A. Rule 56(c) which relates to summary judgment should be amended by the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has not is

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00560-CV Citizens, Inc.; CICA Life Ltd.; and CICA Life Insurance Company of America, Appellants v. Randall H. Riley; Citizens American Life, LLC; and Citizens American Life, Inc., Appellees FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-18-006739, THE HONORABLE AMY C

763 A.2d 96 (2000) Leslie J. SOUCI, Appellant, v. WILLIAM C. SMITH & COMPANY, Appellee. No. 99-CV-1086. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 25, 2000. Decided December 7, 2000. *97 Patrick A. Hyde, Washington, DC, for appellant. Roger W. Heald, Washington, DC, for appellee. Befo

PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Martin County Conservation Alliance v. Martin County, 73 So.3d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review pr

DAVIS, Chief Judge. Thomas R. Davis, as personal representative of the Estate of Cathleen Sandy, challenges the trial court’s order granting the motion to compel arbitration filed by Hearthstone Senior Communities, Inc., and its related entities (the nursing home). Because the record does not include sufficient facts to support the order, we must reverse.

VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge. Plaintiffs Anna Basso, Amy Hartman ("Hartman"), and Jaime Villa Ruiz (collectively, "Plaintiffs") seek to certify, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b) (3) (" Rule 23(b)(3)"), a class consisting of the students who attended Defendant New York University's ("NYU") now-defunct, Singapore-based Tisch School of the Arts, Asia ("Tisch Asia"). (See"Motion for Class Certif

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the maternal grandmother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), entered March 22, 2013, as, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition to modify a prior order of custody so as to award him sole legal and residential custody of the subject child. O

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 23-CF-0389 DAIQUON D. GREER, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES

21-76 United States v. Overton United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2021 Argued: January 18, 2022 Decided: February 3, 2022 No. 21-76 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. The law is well established that a defendant cannot relitigate the denial of a motion to suppress evidence after he enters a valid, unconditional guilty plea. Appellant Walter Porter entered such a plea. But he asks us to overturn the District Court's order denying his motion to suppress because he never intentionally relinquished ( i.e.

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-21-00063-CR ________________ JAMES RAY BATES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________