Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rui G. Silva”
Zayas Rodríguez v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.public domain
La Jueza Presidenta Oronoz Rodríguez emitió la opinión del Tribunal. En esta ocasión debemos interpretar la Ley Núm. 180-1998, según enmendada, conocida como la Ley de Salario Mínimo, Vacaciones y Licencia por Enfermedad de Puerto Rico, 29 LPRA sec. 250 et seq. (Ley Núm. 180). Específicamente, nos corresponde determinar si la referida ley obliga a un patrono privado a liquidar el balance acumulado de
Commonwealth v. Barrospublic domain
Spina, J. The defendant, Rui M. Barros, was convicted in the District Court of carrying a firearm without a license and possession of ammunition without a firearm identification card. On appeal he claims error in the denial of his motion to suppress the firearm and the ammunition taken from his person after a police officer stopped him based on an anonymous tip and, he argues, without reasonable suspicion to believe he was commit
Polanco v. UPS Freight Services, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER Delgado-Hernández, District Judge Joanna Polanco and Yolanda Escudero initiated this employment discrimination, hostile work environment, and .retaliation against UPS Freight Services, Inc. under various Federal and Puerto Rico statutes (Docket No. 31).1 Polanco’s husband, José L. Nevarez, joined in the action, claiming to have suffered damages resulting from
Lovan v. Holderpublic domain
574 F.3d 990 (2009) Chanh LOVAN, Petitioner, v. Eric C. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondents. No. 08-2177. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 11, 2009. Filed: July 31, 2009. *992 Barbara A. Schwartz, argued, David Pille and Miacaela Schuneman, Student Legal Interns from the
Chanh Lovan v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.public domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2177 ___________ Chanh Lovan, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an Order v. * of the Board of
United States v. Fernandespublic domain
708 F.Supp.2d 130 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Manelenho FERNANDES. Criminal No. 09-10272-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 28, 2010. *131 Syrie D. Fried, Federal Public Defender Office, District of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, for Manelenho Fernandes. FINDINGS OF FACT, RULINGS OF L
226 F.Supp.2d 459 (2002) UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY and American Home Assurance, Plaintiffs, v. BRASPETRO OIL, et al., Defendants. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company and American Home Assurance, Plaintiffs, v. Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, et al., Defendants. No. 97 CIV. 6124(JGK). No. 98 CIV. 3099(JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York.<
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
Zayas Rodríguez v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.public domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Noel Zayas Rodríguez y otros Recurridos 2016 TSPR 118 v. 195 DPR ____ Puerto Rico Telephone Co. Peticionaria Número del Caso: CC-2014-127 Fecha: 10 de junio de 2016 Tribunal de Apelaciones: Región Judicial de Bayamón, Panel VII Abogados de la parte Peticionaria: Lcdo. Gregory T. Usera Lcda. Marisara
Exum v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims PORTIA EXUM, Petitioner, No. 21-1513V v. Filed Under Seal: February 26, 2025 1 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Publication Date: March 20, 2025 Respondent.
Morales Bengochea v. Banco Popularpublic domain
*754Opinión de conformidad emitida por el Juez Asociado Señor Rivera Pérez, a la cual se une el Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López. La acción incoada por el señor Morales ante el Tribunal de Primera Instancia contra su patrono, el Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), fue originalmente desestimada me-diante una sentencia sumari
Exum v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims PORTIA EXUM, No. 21-1513 Petitioner, Filed Under Seal: September 18, 2025 v. Publication: September 30, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 2025 1 HUMAN SERVICES,
State v. Carvalhopublic domain
978 P.2d 718 (1999) 90 Hawai`i 280 STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean K. CARVALHO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 21701. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. May 20, 1999. *719 Linda C.R. Jameson, Deputy Public Defender, on the brief, for the defendant-appellant Sean K. Carvalho Bryan K. Sano, Deputy Prose
Commonwealth v. Thomas Mercadopublic domain
SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. THOMAS MERCADO Docket: 0683CR00250 Dates: June 27, 2023 Present: Robert B. Gordon
Nuno v. County of San Bernardinopublic domain
58 F.Supp.2d 1127 (1999) Jesus NUÑO, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, San Bernardino County Sheriff, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, San Bernardino County Sheriff V. Moreno, # M3638, sued individually and in his official capacity, and does 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. No. ED CV 98-175 RT (VAPx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 28, 1999.
Morales Bengochea v. Banco Popular De P.R.public domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Heberto Morales Bengochea Certiorari Peticionario 2008 TSPR 73 vs. 173 DPR ____ Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Recurrido Número del Caso: CC-2006-232 Fecha: 7 de mayo de 2008 Tribunal de Apelaciones: Región Judicial de San Juan Juez Ponente: Hon. I
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Miguel Leal-Rodriguez (“Leal”) brings this appeal from an order of deportation affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). An immigration judge ordered Leal deported on two grounds: as an alien convicted of a controlled substance violation, see 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(11) (1988), and as an alien who entered into the United States without submitting to inspection, see 8 U.S.C. § 12
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
MINER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-counter-defendants-appellants, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & G”) and American Home Assurance Company (collectively, “Appellants” or the “Sureties”), appeal from judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Koeltl, /.), entered after a two-month, technically-complex bench trial that resulted in a damages award of over $370 million a
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV