⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Rucker v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC”

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2016-12-14 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00121-CV Nancy ALANIS, Appellant v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicin
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2017-04-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00204-CV FREDDIE L. SHELLNUT APPELLANT V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., D/B/A APPELLEES AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY; U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC., AS TRUSTEE FOR CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., HOME EQUITY ASSET TRUST 2006-7, HOME EQUITY
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2013-03-12 · Published · cited 3× · 488 B.R. 601; 2013 WL 1091730; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 907
MEMORANDUM SHELLEY D. RUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge. The plaintiffs and debtors Joel Robert Jenkins and Traci Lynn Jenkins (“Plaintiffs” or “Debtors”) filed this adversary proceeding against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC (“Defendant” or “Chase”). The Plaintiffs’ claims are breach of contract and/or promissory es-toppel based on Chase’s alleged promises rela
District Court, D. Maryland · 2018-01-25 · Published · cited 35× · 289 F. Supp. 3d 676
Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge On September 13, 2007, Plaintiff Aleea Proctor obtained a $126,889.98 mortgage loan secured by the real property she purchased at 2066 Shadyside Avenue, Suitland, Maryland 20746 (the "Property"). Am. Compl. ¶¶ 20-21, ECF No. 20. After a foreclosure action was initiated against Proctor in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County, Case No. CAEF15-00209 (the "Foreclosure Action"), id.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019-05-28 · Published · cited 94× · 925 F.3d 265
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. *269This putative class action concerns defendant Fifth Third Bank's "Early Access" cash advance loan program, a short-term lending option the bank offered to certain customers who held eligible checking accounts with it. Fifth Third, as both lender and bank, had direct access to borrowers' checking accounts. It deposite
Royster v. Gahlerpublic domain
District Court, D. Maryland · 2015-12-31 · Published · cited 17× · 154 F. Supp. 3d 206; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173550; 2015 WL 9582977
MEMORANDUM OPINION Ellen L. Hollander, United States District Judge In an Amended Complaint (ECF 5) filed in July 2015, Angela Royster, plaintiff, filed suit against two defendants: Jeffrey R. Gahler, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Harford County, and the State of Maryland. She alleges age discrimination in employment, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010-03-02 · Published · cited 5× · 424 B.R. 315; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 527; 2010 WL 711632
424 B.R. 315 (2010) In re Jamal T. SCOTT and Debra L. Scott, Debtors. William Todd Drown, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., Defendants. In re Amelia F. Bridgeforth, Debtor. William Todd Drown, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Colony Mortgage Corp., et al., Defendants. In re Steven W. Walsh and Mandy A. Walsh, Debtors. William Todd Drown, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. America's Wholesale Lender, et al., Defe
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2012-04-23 · Published · cited 17× · 856 F. Supp. 2d 1247; 2012 WL 1415323; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56233
ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge. Alleging violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a), and the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310, the Federal Trade Commission sues (Doc. 1) three corporate defendants and six individual defendants. Each of the nine defendants engaged in the marketing and sale of mortgage loan modification ser