Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Roy Rogers”
State of Tennessee v. Roy Rogers, Jr.public domain
04/23/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 3, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROY ROGERS, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. 9449 Clayburn Peeples, Judge ___________________________________
Woodman Construction, Inc. v. Roy Rogers, Inc.public domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-2-09287-4, Douglass A. North, J., entered November 8, 2006. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Ellington, J., and Coleman, J. Pro Tern.
Segal v. Roy Rogers Restaurantpublic domain
Leave to appeal is granted, limited to the issue of whether N.J.S.A. 34:15-10 exempts all minors from the bar of the Workers’ Compensation Act, and the trial court’s order of February 1, 1999, holding that all minors are not exempt, is summarily reversed. Jurisdiction is not retained.
State of Tennessee v. Roy Thomas Rogers, Jr.public domain
07/14/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 5, 2022 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROY THOMAS ROGERS, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. H9449 Clayburn L. Peeples, Judge ___________________________________
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: BACKGROUND Mercurris, a Guyanese national, accumulated six convictions for the criminal sale of marijuana in New York State courts between 1982 and 1984. In late 1985 he was deported to Guyana. About two years later, Mercurris illegally re-entered the United States. He was arrested on March 18, 1993. After initial attempts to pros
Roy Len Rogers v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
04/23/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 20, 2017 ROY LEN ROGERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Rhea County No. 16878 J. Curtis Smith, Judge No. E2017-00445-CCA-R3-PC The petitioner,
Roy Thomas Rogers, Jr. v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
11/20/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 10, 2018 ROY THOMAS ROGERS, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. H9449 Clayburn Peeples, Judge ___________________________________
Roy Len Rogers v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2015 ROY LEN ROGERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rhea County No. 16878 J. Curtis Smith, Judge No. E2015-00255-CCA-R3-PC – Filed July 27, 2015 ____________________________ Petitioner, Roy Len Rogers, was convicted of f
Rogers v. Roy W. Jordan, Jr., P.A.public domain
Aff. Cir. Ct. (Palm Beach)
State of Tennessee v. Roy Thomas Rogerspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 5, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROY THOMAS ROGERS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. 9449 Clayburn L. Peeples, Judge No. W2015-00988-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 15, 2016 Following a jury trial, the Defendant, Roy Thomas Rogers, was convicted of initiating the manufa
Barnett v. Rogerspublic domain
DON E. BURRELL, J. Cheryl Barnett (“Petitioner”) sought to remove her brother, Roy Rogers, Jr., (“Trustee”), as trustee of the Roy Rogers and Dale Evans Rogers Trust (“the Trust”) and obtain awards of compensatory and punitive damages for Trustee’s alleged breach of his fiduciary duties to the Trust. After a bench trial, the trial court denied relief.1 In a single point relied on
State of Tennessee v. Roy Len Rogerspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 18, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROY LEN ROGERS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rhea County No. 16878 J. Curtis Smith, Judge No. E2011-02529-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 23, 2013 The Defendant, Roy Len Rogers, was convicted by a Rhea County jury of first degree premeditated
Rendino v. Roy Rogers Family Restaurantspublic domain
JAMISON, J., The question presented in this motion for sanctions is whether a plaintiff is required to answer defendant’s interrogatories when defendant has failed to produce a copy of a statement given by plaintiff to defendant prior to discovery. As plaintiff correctly asserts in his answer to defendant’s motion for sanctions, the Pennsylvania lower courts have consistently held that where a defendant has secured a sta
State v. Rogerspublic domain
Petition for review dismissed.
United States v. Roy Rogers Fauntleroypublic domain
PER CURIAM. Roy Rogers Fauntleroy appeals from his conviction by the district court sitting without a jury on two counts charging him with knowingly making false statements in the purchase of firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6). 1 Fauntleroy was sentenced to conc
State v. Rogerspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA16-48 Filed: 7 February 2017 New Hanover County, Nos. 13 CRS 56716-17 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANTWARN LEE ROGERS Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 13 August 2015 by Judge W. Allen Cobb, Jr., in New Hanover County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 8 August 2016. Attorney General Roy Cooper1, by Special
Rogers v. Morrispublic domain
ORDER Wisconsin inmate Roy Rogers sued sixteen employees of the Columbia Correctional Institution (CCI) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they violated his First Amendment rights by withholding various magazines devoted to hip-hop music and culture (“Vibe,” “Sister 2 Sister,” and “Mo’ Flava”) and certain “internet materials” sent to him by mail. Rogers argued that although CCI purportedly withheld the magazines under prison regula
State v. Rogerspublic domain
STEPHENS, Judge. *202 On 18 June 2012, Defendant Antwon Terrell Rogers was under surveillance by a team from the “career criminal unit” of the Raleigh Police Department (“RPD”), which was seeking to serve Defendant with an outstanding warrant and a grand jury indictment for having attained the status of
In Re Roypublic domain
387 S.C. 372 (2010) 692 S.E.2d 916 In the Matter of Roger Paul ROY, Jr., Respondent. No. 26815. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard March 4, 2010. Decided May 3, 2010. *373 Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and William C. Campbell, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia, for O
State v. Rogerspublic domain
STEELMAN, Judge. Where there was substantial evidence that defendant committed the crimes charged, the trial court did not err in denying each of defendant’s motions to dismiss. Where the trial court’s instruction to the jury on first-degree burglary cited the underlying felony as robbery with a dangerous weapon, rather than felony larceny as set forth in the indictment, any error was not prejudicial. Where the State present