Cases

[Cite as Capital One Bank (USA), NA v. Reese, 2015-Ohio-4023.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), NA, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2014-P-0034 - vs -

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Plaintiff Abigail Strubel brings this putative class action against Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (“Capital One”) for violating the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. (“TILA”). Strubel alleges that Capital One sent her a credit card solicitation accompanied by disclosures that failed to comply with TILA and with its impleme

Capital One, N.A. v Saglimbeni (2019 NY Slip Op 01837) Capital One, N.A. v Saglimbeni 2019 NY Slip Op 01837 Decided on March 14, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-2043 Filed November 25, 2015 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RANDY TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Hancock County, Paul Riffel, Judge. Randy Taylor appeals the district court’s summary judgment decision denying his

[Cite as Daly v. Rowe, 2022-Ohio-3750.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO CLIFFORD LAWTON DALY, JR., APPEAL NOS. C-220026 : C-220031 Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross- TRIAL NO. A-1805658 Appellant, : O P I N I O N. vs. BRU

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 11 U.S. Bank National Association, &c., Respondent, v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., Appellant. Richard A. Jacobsen, for appellant. Kathleen M. Sullivan, for respond

*512OPINION WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge: Plaintiff Jessica Trumper alleges that she received unsolicited calls from Defendant GE Capital Retail Bank (“GE”), in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. GE moves to dismiss Trum-per’s Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). There was no oral argument. • F

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Flagstar Capital Mkts. (2018 NY Slip Op 06851) Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Flagstar Capital Mkts. 2018 NY Slip Op 06851 [32 NY3d 139] October 16, 2018 Fahey, J. Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Rep

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 84 In the Matter of Part 60 Put-Back Litigation. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, &c., Respondent, v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, &c., et al., Appellan

828 N.E.2d 1155 (2005) 215 Ill.2d 1 293 Ill.Dec. 657 Willard J. KING, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. FIRST CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, d/b/a FCF Funding, Appellee. Ricky Jenkins et al., Appellants, v. Concorde Acceptance Corporation et al., Appellees. Nos. 97263, 97761. Supreme Court of Illinois. April 21, 200

135 S.W.3d 849 (2004) GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL ASSURANCE CO. and Bank One Texas, N.A., Appellants, v. Barrie Brooks JACKSON Jr. and Milton E. Richards, Appellees. No. 01-02-00108-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). February 19, 2004. Rehearing Overruled June 2, 2004. William Book, Tekell, Book, Matthews & Limmer, L.L.P., Houston,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LERNER & ROWE PC, an Arizona No. 23-16060 corporation, D.C. No. 2:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 01540-DGC v. OPINION BROWN ENGSTRAND & SHELY LLC, DBA Accident Law Group, an Arizona corporation; JOSEPH L. BROWN, an individual, Defendants-Appellees, and DOES, 1-10, inc

OPINION CHÁVEZ, Justice. {1} This case requires us once again to examine traditional rules of jurisdiction and standing in the context of modern mortgage foreclosure actions. In Bank of New York v. Romero, 2014-NMSC-007, ¶¶ 19-38, 320 P.3d 1, we concluded that the plaintiff did not establish standing to foreclose on the defe

MlKELL, Presiding Judge. The Bank of North Georgia (the “Bank”) sued borrowers Capital City Developers, LLC; Anderson Avenue Partners, LLC; Giles Properties, LP; and Benjamin Michael Giles, along with guarantors Benjamin J. Giles, Jr.; Harold T. Pounders; and Keith D. Kantor (collectively, “Appellants”) to collect money owed, alleging that Appellants had defaulted on 24 promissory notes and related guaranties. The trial cour

Banyan Mezzanine Fund II, LP v. Rowe, 2016 NCBC 35. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 16 CVS 3701 BANYAN MEZZANINE FUND II, LP; ) BANYAN EQUITY INVESTORS II, INC.; ) CENTRAL ILLINOIS ANESTHESIA ) SERVICES, LTD. PROFIT SHARING PLAN ) TRUST; MICHA

OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: Appellant Rowe Sanderson III appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Appellees Hank and Dolly Willmses’ motion for an extension of time to file a nondischargeability complaint. We conclude that under our existing case law the bankruptcy court erred in two ways — by sua spo

666 So.2d 1312 (1996) COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK v. W. Kirby ROWE, Jr., et al. No. 27800-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. January 24, 1996. Rehearing Denied February 22, 1996. *1313 Schober, Reynolds & Antee by Kenneth R. Antee, Jr., Shreveport, for Defendants-Appellants. Cook, Yancey, K

Iberdrola Energy Projects v Oaktree Capital Mgt. L.P. (2024 NY Slip Op 03798) Iberdrola Energy Projects v Oaktree Capital Mgt. L.P. 2024 NY Slip Op 03798 Decided on July 11, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department HIGGITT, J.

Iberdrola Energy Projects v Oaktree Capital Mgt. L.P. (2024 NY Slip Op 03798) Iberdrola Energy Projects v Oaktree Capital Mgt. L.P. 2024 NY Slip Op 03798 Decided on July 11, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Higgitt, J.

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Donna Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Company (A-16-18) (081602) Argued March 25, 2019 -- Decided September 11, 2019 PATTERSON, J., writing for the Court. The Court c