⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Rouse v. Anderson”

Bateman v. Rousepublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004-05-03 · Published · cited 2× · 596 S.E.2d 386; 358 S.C. 667; 2004 S.C. App. LEXIS 133
358 S.C. 667 (2004) 596 S.E.2d 386 Clotell BATEMAN, Respondent/Appellant, v. Helen v. ROUSE, Appellant/Respondent. No. 3792. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 11, 2004. Decided May 3, 2004. *670 Craig E. Burgess, of Atlanta, for Appellant-Respondent. Deena Smit
People v. Rousepublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022-12-05 · Published · cited 6× · 224 N.E.3d 862; 2022 IL App (1st) 210761
2022 IL App (1st) 210761 No. 1-21-0761 Opinion filed December 5, 2022 First Division ___________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 682 So. 2d 1338; 96 La.App. 1 Cir. 0174; 1996 La. App. LEXIS 2717; 1996 WL 663810
I2FOGG, Judge. By this appeal, a workers’ compensation claimant contests the hearing officer’s computation of the reverse offset provided for by LSA-R.S. 23:1225. For the following reasons, we affirm. On September 14, 1989, Richmond Boyd, Jr. was injured while in the course and scope *1339of his employment with Rouse’s Supermarket. At the time
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
FIFTH DIVISION MERCIER, C. J., MCFADDEN, P. J., and RICKMAN, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules December 10, 2
State v. Rousepublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1994-12-30 · Published · cited 90× · 451 S.E.2d 543; 339 N.C. 59; 1994 N.C. LEXIS 719
451 S.E.2d 543 (1994) 339 N.C. 59 STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Bernard ROUSE. No. 120A92. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 30, 1994. *548 Michael F. Easley, Atty. Gen. by Mary Jill Ledford, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. Andrew O. Whiteman, Robin Adams Anderson, and John R. Rittelme
Rouse v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 3× · 296 Ga. 213; 765 S.E.2d 879; 2014 Ga. LEXIS 921
Thompson, Chief Justice. Appellant Steven Rouse was found guilty of felony murder and robbery in connection with the beating death and robbery of Scott Gillens. His motion for new trial, in which he asserted the general grounds, was denied, and he appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by commenting on the evidence in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57. After reviewing the record and relevant case law, we agree that the trial
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-09-03 · Published · cited 2× · 936 F.3d 849
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2554 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Matthew Rouse,
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2021-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) ANDERSON V. ANDERSON NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). AMANDA J. ANDERSON, NOW KNOWN AS AMANDA J. SCHAAF, APPELLEE, V.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015-06-11 · Published · cited 33× · 116 A.3d 894; 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 262
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: In 1985, appellants were tried and convicted for the kidnapping, armed robbery, and first-degree felony murder while armed of Catherine Fuller on October 1, 1984. This court affirmed their convictions on direct appeal. Some twenty-five years later, appellants returned to Superi- or Court with motions to vacate their convictions pursuant to D.C.Code § 2
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017-05-16 · Published · cited 2× · 219 So. 3d 599; 2017 WL 2129747; 2017 Miss. App. LEXIS 275
BARNES, J„ FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Marzettia Moore filed a negligence complaint against Rouse’s Enterprises LLC (Rouse’s) after she slipped and fell in a Rouse’s grocery store. At trial, the Harrison County Circuit Court, First Judicial District, granted Rouse’s motion for a directed verdict, finding Moore had failed to satisfy her burden of proof for th
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012-12-21 · Published · cited 2× · 914 F. Supp. 2d 717; 2012 WL 6681786; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180909
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 70.) The plaintiff, Katharine Rouse, has pending claims against the defendant, Duke University, for creation and maintenance of a hostile educational environment, negligence, negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of contrac
State v. Andersonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-07-17 · Published · cited 5× · 2024 Ohio 2704
[Cite as State v. Anderson, 2024-Ohio-2704.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRIAN L. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 173 F. App'x 248
PER CURIAM: Tyrell Davron Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Warden, No. CA-05-2663-1AMD (D. Md. filed Dec. 2, 2005 & entered Dec. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005-08-17 · Published · cited 0× · 418 F.3d 393; 2005 WL 1903831
PUBLISHED Filed: August 9, 2005 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA ANDERSON,  Plaintiff-Appellant, and SHERMAN T. LOTT; VERNELLE PAYTON; LARRY COLEMAN; AVA HAWKINS; CURTIS YOUNG; CLINTON EDWARDS, JR.; FRANCIS H. NEWMAN, JR.; SAMUEL QUILLER; PAMELA WADE; BENNIE BREELAND; GLENN STEPHENSON; KENNETH L. BRADY, SR.; CLYDE REED; ROBIN
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2018-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : IN RE ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC. : Consolidated FIDUCIARY LITIGATION : C.A. No. 12194-VCS : MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: December 19, 2017 Date Decided: March 9, 2018 Stuart M. Grant, Esquire, Cynthia A. Calder, Esquire, Nathan A. Cook,
State v. Andersonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-03-23 · Published · cited 8× · 211 N.E.3d 779; 2023 Ohio 945
[Cite as State v. Anderson, 2023-Ohio-945.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRIAN L. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005-05-04 · Published · cited 225× · 406 F.3d 248; 67 Fed. R. Serv. 185; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7697; 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,940; 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1121; 2005 WL 1027356
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA ANDERSON,  Plaintiff-Appellant, and SHERMAN T. LOTT; VERNELLE PAYTON; LARRY COLEMAN; AVA HAWKINS; CURTIS YOUNG; CLINTON EDWARDS, JR.; FRANCIS H. NEWMAN, JR.; SAMUEL QUILLER; PAMELA WADE; BENNIE BREELAND; GLENN STEPHENSON; KENNETH L. BRADY, SR.; CLYDE REED; ROBIN HOLMAN; JOHN L. NAYLOR; GWENDOLYN H. WATTS; ALTON BARNES; HAYWARD
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
EFiled: Dec 08 2016 04:13PM EST Transaction ID 59932209 Case No. Multi-Case IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Sunrise Partners Limited Partnership, Petitioner, C.A. No. 12609-VCS v. Rouse Properties, Inc., Respondent. Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.,
District Court, D. Kansas · 1999-10-25 · Published · cited 10× · 85 F. Supp. 2d 1084; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21791; 1999 WL 965844
85 F.Supp.2d 1084 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dan ANDERSON (01), Robert C. LaHue (03), Ronald H. LaHue (04), Defendants. Nos. 98-20030-01-JWL, 98-20030-03-JWL, 98-20030-04-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 6, 1999. Memorandum and Order Denying Reconsideration October 25, 1999. *108
District Court, D. Kansas · 1999-07-21 · Published · cited 4× · 85 F. Supp. 2d 1047; 53 Fed. R. Serv. 1255; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12229
85 F.Supp.2d 1047 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dan ANDERSON (01), Robert C. LaHue (03), Ronald H. LaHue (04), Dennis McClatchey (06), Defendants. Nos. 98-20030-01-JWL, 98-20030-03-JWL, 98-20030-04-JWL and 98-20030-06-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 21, 1999. *1048