Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ross v. Slagle”
Slagle v. Rosspublic domain
SHAW, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur in denying Clay C. Slagle’s motion to “disqualify” Special Justice Har-wood; I adhere to my dissent in this matter issued on original submission, and I therefore dissent from the overruling of the application for rehearing.
State v. Slaglepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Slagle, 2011-Ohio-1463.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HIGHLAND COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case Nos. 10CA4 & 10CA5 : vs. : Released: March 11, 2011 : JOHN W. SLAGLE, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT
02/18/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 2, 2021 Session TOM SLAGLE ET AL. V. THE CHURCH OF THE FIRTSBORN OF TENNESSEE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Robertson County No. CH18-CV-487 Laurence M. McMillan, Jr., Chancellor
State v. Rosspublic domain
Harsha, J. {¶ 1} Based upon his possession, funding and sales of certain controlled substance analogs, Michel L. Ross pleaded guilty to engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, conspiracy to engage in a pattern of corrupt activity, and aggravated funding of drug trafficking. Ross failed to appear for the sentencing hearing and remained at large for three years. Upon his apprehension, he received an aggregate 30-year prison term.</
State v. Rosspublic domain
[Cite as State v. Ross, 2014-Ohio-2867.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 26694 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE DENNY F. ROSS
Purcell v. Slaglepublic domain
Per Curiam. This is an appeal of the plaintiffs from a judgment of dismissal in a summary process action. The case is a procedural bramblebush. The plaintiffs, owners of a commercial building in Greenwich, leased office space in their building to the defendants under a written lease agreement dated January 11, 1977. On October 1, 1982, the plaintiffs commenced this summary process action against the defendants
Slagle v. Halseypublic domain
This appeal is by contestant from the probation of a will. The grounds of the contest were that at the time of the execution of the will, the testator was not of sound mind nor capable of making disposition of her property; that testator was at the time under the domination and control of James Halsey, one of *Page 200 the devisees under the will; that said purported will was the result and product of said undue influence exercised by him over the
Ross v. Rosspublic domain
397 N.E.2d 1066 (1979) Carl ROSS, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. Charlotte ROSS (Now Balsley), Appellee. (Defendant below). No. 2-278A68. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. December 19, 1979. *1067 Briscoe & Briscoe by David L. Briscoe, Kokomo, for appellant. Keith, Berkshire & Keith by Russell T. Keith,
MARVIN, Judge. In this action under the Public Works Act (R.S. 38:2241 et seq.), the plaintiff appeals the rejection of its demands for recognition of a materialman’s lien arising out of the construction of the football stadium at Northeast Louisiana University in Monroe, a concrete structure completed in September, 1978. The lower court held that the material sold by plaintiff to a subcontractor (plywood
D. Ross Beins v. United Statespublic domain
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Chief Judge, concurring: I join in the court’s judgment and, save on one point, in its opinion. Though I agree on affirmance, I have difficulty with the court’s position on the relationship of the discretionary function exemption to neurologic testing in airman medical certification procedures. I thus write to elucidate my approach to questions of application of the exemption, an
State v. Gravespublic domain
{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a Ross County Common Pleas Court judgment of conviction and sentence. Ryan L. Graves, defendant below and appellant herein, pleaded guilty to gross sexual imposition, in violation of R.C. 2907.05, and the trial court adjudicated him a "sexual predator." From that adjudication, appellant assigns the following errors for review: First Assignment of Error: The trial court erred by re
ROSS, Circuit Judge. This action was filed by five Kansas City, Missouri, Savings and Loan Associations seeking to invalidate the FSLIC and Federal Home Loan Bank Board’s (Board) approval of Home Savings of America’s (Home Savings) application for branch offices in the State of Missouri.1 The appellants claimed that Home Savings was not lawfully present in Missouri, and, therefore, it could not ap
State v. Simonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Simon, 2024-Ohio-925.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GALLIA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 23CA3 : v. : : DECISION AND JUDGMENT SHAWN C. SIMON, : ENTRY
State v. Lemasterpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Lemaster, 2022-Ohio-4157.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 22CA1 : v. : : DECISION AND JUDGMENT 1 WILLIAM D. LEM
PER CURIAM. This case comes before us from a grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants, Will Darrah & Associates (hereinafter Darrah) and Underwriters Members of Lloyd’s of London (hereinafter Lloyd’s). The plaintiff, Premium Financing Specialists (hereinafter PFS) appeals the grant of summary judgment on the basis that genuine issues of material fact are p
State v. Maurentpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Maurent, 2018-Ohio-5304.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon
State v. Ludwickpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Ludwick, 2023-Ohio-1113.] 0 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HIGHLAND COUNTY State of Ohio, : Case No. 22CA9 Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : DECISION AND
Russ v. Whitepublic domain
PER CURIAM. This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 brought by Dr. John Russ, formerly Dean of Instruction at Garland County Community College in Hot Springs, Garland County, Arkansas, against Dr. Gerald Fisher, President of the College, and the members of the College’s Board of Trustees. Plaintiff’s principal claims are that he was discharged as a result of his exercise of rights of free speech secured by the First and Fou
State v. Vancepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Vance, 2018-Ohio-4479.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 17CA9 vs. : LEWIS VANCE, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Defendant-Appell
Eddie Brunson v. Gerald Higgins, Superintendentpublic domain
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Eddie Brunson appeals the district court’s 1 , 542 F.Supp. 216, denial of his petition for postconviction relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Brunson contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to make a motion to disqualify th