Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ross v. Brandt”
Ross v. Brandtpublic domain
Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ. [See ante, p. 677.]
Ross v. Brandtpublic domain
Order unanimously modified to allow examination of defendants as to items 11, 12, 16 and 19 to 27 specified in the notice of motion. In the stockholders’ derivative action items 11 and 12 relate to purchases of stock in another corporation and the purchase of a leasehold to the profit of defendants and to disadvantage of the corporation for whose benefit this action is maintained. Item 16 relates to the transactions of defendant Brandt in relation to other i
State v. Brandtpublic domain
772 N.W.2d 674 (2009) 2009 WI App 115 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ross B. BRANDT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2008AP550-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on Briefs September 8, 2008. Opinion Filed July 16, 2009. *675 On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause
Ross-Williams v. Bennettpublic domain
Bruns, J.: *527 *615 This is a derivative action filed in Johnson County District Court by Monica Ross-Williams on behalf of the Sprint Nextel Corporation. The action arises out of the 2005 mer
Brandt v. Bassettpublic domain
CARNES, Circuit Judge: This is a consolidated appeal from two district court orders dismissing certain aver-ments brought by a Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee on behalf of a bank holding company against former directors and officers of the holding company and its subsidiary bank. In the first ease, No. 94-4611, the district court dismissed some averments in
Brandt v. Bassettpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ARONOVITZ, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Sec*356ond Amended Complaint, file dated February 22, 1994. The Court has considered the motion and the briefs filed in r
Brandt v. Davispublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 19-P-1189 Appeals Court BROOKE A. BRANDT
Brandt v. Time Insurancepublic domain
704 N.E.2d 843 (1998) 302 Ill. App.3d 159 235 Ill.Dec. 270 Jacqueline BRANDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIME INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee (Douglas Ruth, Lenox Financial Services, Inc., and Insurance Consulting Group, Inc., Defendants). Time Life Insurance Co., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Douglas Ruth and Insurance Consulting Group, Inc., Third-Party Defendants.
Brandt v. R&R Mtn. Esc.public domain
07/22/2025 DA 23-0716 Case Number: DA 23-0716 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2025 MT 155 RODNEY BRANDT, HEIDI BRANDT, MARSHALL FLADAGER, NEVA FLADAGER, ARRY LAUTARET and RENA LAUTARET, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and
Brandt v. Steel Hector & Davispublic domain
213 B.R. 406 (1997) William A. BRANDT, Jr., as Trustee of the Chapter 7 Estate of the Southeast Banking Corporation, Plaintiff, v. STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS, et al., Defendant. Case No. 95-2553-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. August 1, 1997. *407 Virginia J. Harnisch, Ross & Hardies, New York,
Asa-Brandt, Inc. v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.public domain
138 F.Supp.2d 1144 (2001) ASA-BRANDT, INC. a/k/a ASA-Brandt Partnership; Phillip ASA; Keith Brandt; Robert Becker; Dennis Cink; Duanne Dewaard; Beverly Everett; Richard Gardner; Edward A. Otis; Jim Otis; Ronald Schmidt; and Debra Schmidt, Plaintiffs, v. ADM INVESTOR SERVICES, INC.; Fac-Marc, Inc.; Agri-Plan, Inc.; Competitive Strategies for Agriculture, Ltd., and Farmers Co-Operative Society, Defendants. No. C01-3021-MWB.
Brandt v. HICKS, MUSE & CO., INC.public domain
213 B.R. 784 (1997) William A. BRANDT, Jr., Trustee, Plaintiff, v. HICKS, MUSE & CO., INC. et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-40020-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 11, 1997. *785 Michael A. Khoury, Cohn & Kelakos, Boston, MA, J. Joseph Bainton, Jose Baez, Ross & Hardies, New York Ci
Ross v. Nelsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,274 RODNEY L. ROSS and TONDA R. ROSS; RODNEY L. ROSS, as Trustee of CAROL J. ROSS REVOCABLE TRUST; RODNEY L. ROSS, as Trustee of MAYNARD O. ROSS REVOCABLE TRUST; and LAURA E. FIELD, as Trustee of LAURA E. FIELD TRUST NO. 1, Appellees, v. NORM
Thomas v. Brandtpublic domain
325 S.W.3d 481 (2010) Deborah THOMAS and Philip Thomas, Appellants, v. Michael BRANDT, James Loehrer, Respondents, and Community Fire Protection District, Defendant. No. ED 94414. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. September 21, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 2, 2010. Appl
Ross v. City of Tarpon Springspublic domain
BLUE, Chief Judge. Henry Ross appeals the final order by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) that adopted an administrative law judge’s order dismissing Ross’s petition as a sanction for discovery violations. Ross argues that he did not receive adequate notice of the hearing on the motion for sanctions. We agree and reverse. It is undisputed that the only notice Ross received regarding the he
Brandt v. Ozmintpublic domain
664 F.Supp.2d 626 (2009) Donald BRANDT, Petitioner, v. Jonathan OZMINT, Director, S.C. Department of Corrections, and Tom Carter, Sheriff, Allendale County, Respondents. Civil Action No. 6:06-01938-HFF-WMC. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division. September 10, 2009. *629 Jack Bruce Swerling, Jack Swe
Brandt v. McCordpublic domain
281 S.W.3d 394 (2008) Doyle H. BRANDT, et al. v. David H. McCORD, M.D., et al. No. M2007-00312-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. January 9, 2008 Session. March 26, 2008. Petition to Rehear Denied April 15, 2008. Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court October 27, 2008.
203 B.R. 515 (1996) In re HEALTHCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., Debtor. William A. BRANDT, Jr., Trustee, Plaintiff, v. HICKS, MUSE & CO., INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 93-41604-JFQ, Adversary No. 95-4154. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. December 20, 1996. J. Joseph Bainton, Jose Baez, Ross & Hardies, New York City, Michael A.
208 B.R. 288 (1997) In re HEALTHCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., Debtor. William A. BRANDT, Jr., Trustee, Plaintiff, v. HICKS, MUSE & CO., INC. et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 93-41604-JFQ, Adversary No. 95-4154. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. April 9, 1997. *289 *290
201 B.R. 19 (1996) In re HEALTHCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., Debtor. William A. BRANDT, Jr., Trustee, Plaintiff, v. HICKS, MUSE & CO., INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 93-41604-JFQ, Adv. No. 95-4154. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. October 2, 1996. J. Joseph Bainton, Jose Baez, Ross & Hardies, New York City, Michael A. Khoury,