Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ross v. Bank of America N.A. (USA)”
Ross v. Bank of America N.A. (USA)public domain
06-4755- CV Ross v. Bank of America N.A. (USA) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _____________________ August Term, 2007 (Argued: October 25, 2007 Decided: April 25, 2008) Docket No. 06-4755-cv _____________________ ROBERT ROSS, ANDREA KUNE, WOODRO
Ross v. Bank of America, N.A. (USA)public domain
524 F.3d 217 (2008) Robert ROSS, Andrea Kune, Woodrow Clark III, Herve Senequier, S. Byron Balbach Jr., Matthew Grabell, Paul Impellezzeri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (USA), Capital One Bank, Capital One F.S.B., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Chase Bank USA, N.A., Citigroup, Inc., Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Citibank, USA N.A., Citicorp Diners Club Inc., Universal Ba
Ross v. Bank of America N.A.public domain
693 F.Supp.2d 692 (2010) Jeffrey A. ROSS, DPM, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Defendant. Civil Action No. H-09-3626. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 16, 2010. Russell Hardin, Jr., Terry D. Kernell, Rusty Hardin and Associates, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Rupert F. Barron, Hirsch and Westhelmer PC, Houston, TX, for Def
402 B.R. 687 (2009) In re Donald H. DONOHO, Debtor Bank of America, N.A. et al., Plaintiffs v. Brennan Title Company et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-15100-SSM. Adversary No. 08-1481. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. January 29, 2009. *689 Paul K. Campsen, Kaufman & Canoles, P.C., N
Goodrich v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT D. GOODRICH, individually and in his capacity as trustee of the Robert D. Goodrich Revocable Trust, Plaintiff, No. 21-cv-01344 (DLF) v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert D. Goodrich, individua
Bank of America, N.A. v. Groginspublic domain
DiPENTIMA, C.J. *663 In this foreclosure action, the defendants, David Grogins, executor of the estate of Anna S. Grogins, and David Grogins and Malcolm L. Grogins, trustees of the Susan Grogins Trust, 1 appeal
OPINION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice Appellant and cross-appellee, Nancy Alanis, sued appellees, U.S. Bank National Association (“US Bank”), BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. (“BAC”), and the Law Offices of Mann & Stevens (“Mann & Stevens”) for fraud and violations of various debt collection statutes relating to the foreclosure of her
Jaffe v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER Briccetti, United States District Judge In these putative class actions, plaintiffs Denise Jaffe and Daniel Adler, in their capacity as co-executors of Milton Adler’s estate, as well as Derek and Jacqueline Whittenburg, allege defendant Bank of America, N.A., systematically fails to file timely mortgage satisfaction notices for recording, in violation of Section 275 of the New York Real Pro
Alhassid v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs Sarah Alhassid and Sarah Dren-nen’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Certify Class Action, ECF No. [190] (the “Motion”). The Court has reviewed the Motion, all supporting and opposing submissions, the record in this case, and is otherwise fully advised. For the reasons set forth be
United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.public domain
Judge POOLER concurs in a separate opinion. KATZMANN, Chief Judge: We are called upon in this case to address the role of a district court in monitoring the implementation of a deferred prosecution agreement. In December 2012, plaintiff-appellant the United States entered into a five-year deferred prosecution agreement (the “DPA”) with defendants-appellants HSBC Holdings pic and HSBC Bank, USA, N.A. (coll
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Banupublic domain
Bank of Am., N.A. v Banu (2024 NY Slip Op 04940) Bank of Am., N.A. v Banu 2024 NY Slip Op 04940 Decided on October 9, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43
Alhassid v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO SEVER BETH BLOOM, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs Sarah Alhassid and Sarah Drennan’s (“Plaintiffs”) Second Amended Class Action Complaint, ECF No. [73] (“SAC”), filed by Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar” and Nationst
United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.public domain
16‐308(L) United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _________________________ August Term, 2016 (Argued: March 1, 2017 Decided: July 12, 2017)
Morrow v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
JUSTICE MCKINNON, concurring in part and dissentingin part. *60¶72 At its inception, and throughout the proceedings in the District Court, this lawsuit has been about two things: (1) enforcing a modified loan, and (2) obtaining damages for alleged torts arising from the loan mod
Bank of America, N.A. v. Knightpublic domain
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge. Bank of America lost about $34 million when Knight Industries, Knight Quartz Flooring, and KnighL-Celotex (collectively Knight) went bankrupt. It contends in this suit under the diversity jurisdiction that Knight’s directors and managers looted the firm and that its accountants failed to detect the defalcations. The parties agree that Illinois law supplies the rule of decision. The district court di
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Buchwald Capital Advisors LLC (the “Trustee”) appeals from a judgment entered September 30, 2012 by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sullivan, J.), affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court (Bernstein, J.). The Trustee argues that the courts below erred in granting in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the Trustee’s assorted fraudulent conv
Fenello v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Vito J. Fenello, Jr. and Beverly H. Fenello’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Leave to Amend their Complaint [30]. Also before the Court is Bank of America, N.A. (“BAÑA”) and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee for CWALT, Inc.’s (“BONYM”) (together, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss [28] Pl
Bank of America, N.A. v. Freedpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Bank of America, N.A. v. Freed, 2012 IL App (1st) 110749 Appellate Court BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a National Banking Association, Successor Caption by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Agent for Lenders, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAURANCE H. FREED and DDL LLC, an Illinois
Rinaldi v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.public domain
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND AMENDED COMPLAINT SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. Roger Rinaldi (“Mr. Rinaldi”) and Desa Rinaldi (with Mr. Rinaldi, the “Debtors”) filed this adversary proceeding contending that certain mortgage lenders and their lawyers engaged in a “criminogenic scheme” to defraud investors in a secu
Blake v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. I. Introduction This cause comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4) filed by *1208the defendants, Bank of America, NA. (“BAÑA”) and BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. (“BAC”). They contend that the plaintiff, Susan Blake, has failed to state a valid