Cases

Rosenfeld v Rosenfeld (2025 NY Slip Op 01329) Rosenfeld v Rosenfeld 2025 NY Slip Op 01329 Decided on March 11, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

*656 Cuéllar, J. *127 Section 663 of the Code of Civil Procedure allows an aggrieved party in a civil case to move the trial court to vacate its final judgment. The question in this case is wheth

FERNANDEZ, J. This is an appeal from a final judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of the appellees Miguel Rosenfeld and Clarissa Rosenfeld, the sellers. We reverse and remand because there are factual questions that undermine the trial court’s conclusion that the sellers were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. On August 22, 2008, Roberto Cuccarini and Miguel and Clarissa Rosenfeld executed a R

Kaplan, Mitchell H., J. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of the defendant, Gray Wolf Development Corporation’s (“Gray Wolf’), proposal to construct a residence, horse stable, riding arena and related buildings on a 46.56-acre parcel of land in Mendon, Massachusetts (the “Property”). The plaintiffs Jon Rosenfeld, Patricia Rosenfeld and Ellen Rosenfeld, as Trustee of the Ellen Realty Trust (the “

ORDER WEXLER, District Judge: Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to remand this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), on the grounds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action because there is not complete diversity. Defendant Lincoln Life Insurance Company (“Lincoln”) opposes the motion, arguing that Defendant William Segal (“Segal”), whose presence in the. action destroys div

78 Mass. App. Ct. 677 (2011) JON ROSENFELD & others[1] v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF MENDON & others.[2] No. 10-P-341. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Worcester. November 8, 2010. January 28, 2011. Present: BERRY, SMITH, & GREEN, JJ. Marc Rosenfeld for the plaintiffs. Scott A. Ambler for

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I concur in all of the opinion except section 2(C), regarding Rule 11 sanctions against the Growers’ attorneys. I respectfully dissent as to the sanctions, and would reverse that award. In my view, the district court was misled by the Teamsters’ attorneys into a Conclusion for which there was no foundation. The

33 Cal.Rptr.3d 111 (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1466 ZIMMERMAN, ROSENFELD, GERSH & LEEDS LLP, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Glen LARSON, Defendant and Respondent. No. B177971. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four. August 17, 2005. *113 Zimmerman, Rosenfeld, Gersh & Leeds, Gary L. Zimmerman, and

RAMIREZ, C.J. Iris Probkevitz, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Denise Probkevitz, appeals the denial of her motion for new trial and the entry of an adverse final judgment in this wrongful death action. We reverse and remand for a new trial because the trial court impermissibly allowed the introduction of evidence of negligence and allowed the jury to consider such evidence. Furthermore, the trial court incorrect

41 F.Supp.2d 581 (1999) Ethan ROSENFELD, et al. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al. No. Civ. L-98-1793. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 4, 1999. *582 John Montgomery, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. Patricia A. Brannan, and Hogan and Hartson, L.L.P., and Judith S. Bresler and

11 Ariz. App. 383 (1970) 464 P.2d 829 THUNDERBIRD FARMS, an Arizona Corporation, Leon Zigoures and Suburban Gas Service of Casa Grande, an Arizona corporation, Appellants, v. Joe HERNANDEZ and Elvira Hernandez, husband and wife, Appellees. No. 2 CA-CIV 703. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. February 10, 1970. Rehearing Denied Marc

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D. I This case involves claims under both the New Jersey Antitrust Act, for a conspiracy in restraint of trade, and the common law, for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, based on alleged predatory pricing. Plaintiff Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. (Ideal), prevailed at trial and recovered seven-figure damages under

358 F.Supp.2d 863 (2005) INTERNATIONAL CASINGS GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. PREMIUM STANDARD FARMS, INC., Defendant. No. 04-1081-CV-W-NKL. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. February 9, 2005. *864 Andrew J. Enschede, Howard K. Jeruchimowitz, Paul Del Aguila, Paul T. Fox, Greenberg, Traurig, LLP, Chicago,

124 F.3d 999 156 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2148, 134 Lab.Cas. P 10,046,38 Fed.R.Serv.3d 856, 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 597,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6727,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,940 SECURITY FARMS; El Dorado Farms; Manriquez & Acuna, Inc.;Higashi Farms, Inc.; Pisoni Farms, a CaliforniaCorporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFERS,WAREHOUSEMEN & HELP

641 A.2d 75 (1994) UXB SAND & GRAVEL, INC. v. ROSENFELD CONCRETE CORPORATION et al. 92-447-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 4, 1994. *76 John F. Bomster, W. James McKay, William Russo, Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, Providence, for plaintiff. Robert Fine, Licht & Semonoff, Providence, for defendants. <

146 Cal.App.3d 200 (1983) 194 Cal. Rptr. 180 ROSENFELD, MEYER & SUSMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PETER R. COHEN et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. 62372. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. August 18, 1983. *207 COUNSEL Harney & Moore, Rosenfeld, Mey

16 F.Supp. 575 (1936) HIGHLAND FARMS DAIRY, Inc., et al. v. AGNEW et al. No. 363. District Court, E. D. Virginia. October 3, 1936. *576 *577 Before SOPER, Circuit Judge, and WAY and POLLARD, District Judges. Hunton, Williams, Anderson, Gay & Moore, of Richmond, Va., and Philip W. Ro

300 U.S. 608 (1937) HIGHLAND FARMS DAIRY, INC., ET AL. v. AGNEW ET AL. No. 573. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 8, 9, 1937. Decided March 29, 1937. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. *609 Messrs. Philip Rosenfeld and Lawrence Koenigsber

340 F.3d 709 In re POPKIN & STERN, Debtor.Old Republic Insurance Company, Appellee,v.Cynthia Bitting; Lynn G. Carey; William E. Cooper; Jeffrey S. Gershman; Bennett S. Keller; Steven H. Leyton; James R. Nangle, Jr.; John O. Niemann, Pat Simons; Steven M. Stone; Alan N. Zvibleman; Thomas P. Rosenfeld; Donald L. Wolff; and The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants.In re Popkin & Stern, Debtor.Old Republic Insurance

628 F.2d 875 80-2 USTC P 9748 UNITED STATES of America and Internal Revenue ServiceOfficer Jay M. Wendell, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.E. L. HARRIS, Sr., President Fresno Manufacturing Co.,Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America and Internal Revenue ServiceOfficer Jay M. Wendell, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.FRESNO FARMS, INC., E. L. Harris, President, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of