Cases

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Danilo Mendez and the third-party defendant Rosemary Peralta appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated January 31, 2008, which denied their motion for leave to reargue their opposition to that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to enforce a written settlement agreement dated June 7, 2004, which had been determined in an order of the same c

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Danilo Mendez and the third-party defendant Rosemary Peralta appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated August 31, 2007, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to enforce a written settlement agreement dated June 7, 2004. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as a

OPINION Jeff Rose, Chief Justice The State of Texas has filed an application for interlocutory appeal under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 51.014(d), 1 complaining of the district court’s orders denying the State’s motions to dismiss the appellee counties’ lawsuits. Appellees do

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: ROSEMARY L. BOREK JOHN H. HASKIN Stephenson Morow & Semler RYAN P. SINK Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana Apr 01 2013, 9:38 am IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FAYETTE COUNTY BOARD OF )

STEPHEN LOWELL DRUKER * NO. 2022-CA-0261 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL MICHAEL JAMES BERTEL, * FULL SAIL INVESTMENTS, FOURTH CIRCUIT LLC, 1100 PATTERSON, LLC * AND BERTEL STATE OF LOUISIANA CONSTRUCTION, LLC ******* APPEAL FROM

Opinion BEAR, J. The plaintiff, Rosemary Aramony, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding in favor of the defendant, the district of Chapman Beach (district), on the plaintiffs claim of adverse possession. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court incorrectly concluded that she had not established her adverse possession claim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Hines, Presiding Justice. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, as amended, Gregory John Russell appeals his convictions and sentences for felony murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime in connection with the fatal shooting of his wife Windy Michelle Russell. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, certain communications between the trial court and the jury, and the trial court’

705 F.Supp.2d 17 (2010) AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-1743(RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 13, 2010. Andrew J. Mytelka, James Michael Roquemore, Joseph R. Russo, Jr., Steven *18 Carl Windsor, Greer, Herz

Lenk, J. After a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendants, Isaiah Monteiro and Esau DePina, were each found guilty of murder in the first degree on a theory of deliberate premeditation, as well as of related offenses, in the shooting death of the victim, Anthony Hamilton, on November 16, 2009. 1 In this direct appe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1743 (RMC) ) JPMORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) EDWARD RICHARDSON, ) ) Civil Action No. 14-1673 (RMC) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JANET L. YELLE

Opinion BENKE, Acting P. J. — Plaintiffs and appellants Rosemary Morgan and Michelle Luna (collectively plaintiffs) are the widow and daughter, respectively, of decedent Mike Wayne Morgan. Morgan suffered fatal injuries when defendant Thomas Dumin crashed head on into Morgan’s vehicle as Durnin was fleeing from Beaumont Police Officer Brian Stehli during a veh

SHAQUANA HARVEY, * NO. 2023-CA-0084 INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER CAPACITY AS THE NATURAL * TUTRIX OF JADEN HARVEY COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * ERIC WAYNE HAMBY, STATE OF LOUISIANA PLAQUEMINES PARISH ******* SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THROUGH GERALD A.

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the majority opinion to the extent it finds the evidence insufficient to support the Board’s finding of a violation by Phelps Dodge of § 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act. However, to the extent the majority finds the evidence insufficient to show a violation of §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of

988 A.2d 901 (2010) 119 Conn.App. 606 Albert LOPEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 30201. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued December 2, 2009. Decided March 2, 2010. *903 Rosemarie T. Weber, special public defender, for the appellant (petitioner). Linda Currie-Zeffiro, assist

LOWY, J. **389 Shortly after midnight on April 17, 1999, Kevin McCormack and Brian Porreca were part of a group leaving a bar in Malden with plans to continue their night at a club in Boston. They never made it. As the group prepared to leave, Porreca saw two longtime friends, Anthony Barr

Filed 1/29/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Placer) ---- MATTHEW C. BAKOS, C098548 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No.

(2008) RESEARCH AIR, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dirk KEMPTHORNE, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-0623 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 11, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Defendant Henry Diaz-Antunuez is one of nineteen persons charged in this case with offenses related to the gang MS-13. He moves to dismiss the federal court indictment as it relates to him. The lengthy Superseding Indictment charges other Defendants with crimes under federal law, such as conspiracy to violate

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Bondholders of Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu” or the “Bank”) sue JP Morgan Chase Bank and JP Morgan Chase Co. (together “JPMC”) for allegedly spreading misinformation about WaMu that caused credit raters and federal regulators to doubt the Bank’s ability to weather the financial storm of 2008. As a result of t