Cases

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 23-CV-0422 MP PPH, LLC, APPELLANT, V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,

State of Maryland v. Michael Eugene Stone, No. 16, September Term, 2025 FOURTH AMENDMENT – TRAFFIC STOP – REASONABLE SUSPICION – TEXTING WHILE DRIVING – Supreme Court of Maryland held that where conduct observed by officer is consistent with legal or illegal use of mobile phone, to justify traffic stop, police officer must be able to credibly identify specific facts, not applicable to general law-abiding public, “which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts,” Terry v. Ohio, 3

RAKER, Judge. In this case, we again address the constitutional limitations on searches and seizures conducted during the course of a traffic stop. Petitioner Corinthious James Nathan and respondent Horace Shaw, Jr. were convicted of multiple drug possession and importation charges in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, following the court’s denial of their motions to suppre

970 A.2d 894 (2009) 408 Md. 490 Garry Dennis CROSBY, Jr. v. STATE of Maryland. No. 91, September Term, 2008. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 7, 2009. *896 Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, Baltimore, for Petitioner. Brian S. Kleinbord, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen., Baltimore),

BELSON, Senior Judge: These fourteen consolidated appeals arise out of the probate proceedings for the estate of Daniel B. Delaney (decedent). The central issues to be decided are: (1) whether a challenge to the will and a claim for status as common law wife were properly dismissed as time-barred; (2) whether certain disputed accounts were correctly determined to be part of the estate; (3) whether compensation was properly d

RAKER, Judge. Petitioner Peter Michael Ferris appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized by the police. Because the police officer in this case effected a seizure not premised upon the reasonable, articulable suspicion required under the Fourth Amendment, we shall hold that the Circuit Court for *362Was

80 F.3d 869 42 ERC 1353, 64 USLW 2618, 26 Envtl.L. Rep. 21,245 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Petitioner,v.Carol M. BROWNER, Administrator, U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency; Environmental ProtectionAgency, Respondents,American Lung Association of Northern Virginia, and AmericanLung Association of Virginia; Clean Water Action; Friendsof the Rivers of Virginia; the James River Association

Filed: May 9, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1052 Commonwealth of Virginia, Petitioner, versus Carol M. Browner, etc., et al, Respondents. O R D E R The Court further

Petition for review denied by published opinion. Circuit Judge M. BLANE MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Senior District Judge JAMES H. MICHAEL, Jr., joined. OPINION M. BLANE MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: The Commonwealth of Virginia petitions for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s final action disapproving Virginia’s proposed program for issuing air pollu

746 F.Supp. 1122 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, v. Willie C. CHILDRESS, et al. Crim. No. 89-0162. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 29, 1990. *1123 *1124 Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., District of Columbia and Asst. U.S. Attys., John P. Dominguez and David Schertler, f

804 A.2d 1077 (2002) In re Mollie ORSHANSKY; Jane Pollack, Appellant. No. 02-PR-170. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 25, 2002. Decided August 15, 2002. *1079 George A. Teitelbaum, Washington, DC, for appellant. George T. Masson, Washington, DC, for appellee Harry J. Jordan. Tanja H. Castr

[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi

819 A.2d 968 (2003) In re ESTATE OF Daniel B. DELANEY. Edna J. Valentine, Appellant, v. Lawrence M. Elliott, Appellee. Edna J. Valentine, Appellant, v. Lawrence M. Elliott, Appellee. Lawrence M. Elliott and R. Eliot Rosen, Appellants, v. Christopher G. Hoge, Appellee. Christopher G. Hoge, Appellant, v. Edna J. Valentine, Appellee. Lawrence M. Elliott, Appellant, v. Christopher G. Hoge, Appellee.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court in setting aside the verdict of the jury, which was returned in favor of the plaintiff, and in granting the defendant in the court below a new trial. There are several assignments of error, all relating to this one question. Appellant, plaintiff below, sued appellee, defendants, for an alleged unlawful assault upon the plaintiff by a deputy sheriff of Franklin county. The defendants in said action were the sheriff and the surety on

Appellant was the constable of his district and had in his hands a valid writ of replevin to be levied upon an automobile truck in the possession of the deceased. When the officer went to levy the writ, the deceased demurred and contrived excuses for a delay of the levy, which delay was granted by the officer. During this time the deceased appeared to have become enraged and uttered divers insults and threats directed towards the officer. The latter conducted himself nevertheless with patienc

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 286 The suit is for personal injury under the Homicide Act. Code, § 2486. The complaint contains counts for simple negligence, for subsequent negligence, and for wanton, willful, or intentional conduct. Defendant pleaded the general issue to the several counts and special pleas 2 and