Cases

SUNSET HARBOUR, L.L.C. * NO. 2023-CA-0156 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL THE SUCCESSION OF MARY * ROSS BUSH, ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVI

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants Junction Pool Commons, Inc., Lori Ann Bertsch, and Elwin Wood, (collectively, “the Commons” or “Appellants”) appeal the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, J.) upholding the jury’s finding that the Commons discriminated against PlaintiffAppellee Rose Marie Brown because of her race, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. On appeal, the Commo

John Z. Lee, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Michael Rose and Timothy Stratton played football for Purdue University from 1996 to 2001. Purdue is in the Big Ten Conference ("Big Ten"), a Division I conference of the National Collegiate Athletic Association ("NCAA"). Over the course of their college football careers at Purdue, Rose and Stratton experienced thousands of repetitive concussive and subconcussive

Clark, J. Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Mulvey, J.), entered July 24, 2013 in Tompkins County, which partially denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. As a result of events related to a disagreement between plaintiff and employees at the Tompkins County Regional Airport, defendant, a Tompkins County Sheriff, arrested plaintiff after she refused to leave the

Clark, J. Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Mulvey, J.), entered July 24, 2013 in Tompkins County, which partially denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. As a result of events related to a disagreement between plaintiff and employees at the Tompkins County Regional Airport, defendant, a Tompkins County Sheriff, arrested plaintiff after she refused to leave the

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: The principal question before the district court was whether the employers’ pension benefit plan in this case is a “governmental plan” within the meaning of section 3(32) the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(32). The Plaintiffs-Appellants (the “Plaintiffs,” collectively) are approximately forty former employees of N

OPINION HARVEY BROWN, Justice. Brother and sister Juan Carlos Diaz and Ana C. Fudge appeal the dismissal of their claim that their niece, Rose Marie Elkin, breached her fiduciary duties as co-execu *262 trix of her grandmother’s estate. Elkin filed a plea to the jurisdiction

24 So.3d 671 (2009) Robert Lee BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D08-3196. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. December 18, 2009. *673 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. *674

22 F.Supp.2d 343 (1998) Marie WALKER et al., Plaintiffs, v. Justin ROSE et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 97-5702(GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 10, 1998. *344 *345 Joseph J. Fell, Danzig, Garubo & Kaye, LLP, Florham Park, NJ, for Marie Walker, Health and Welfare P

OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion (ECF DKT # 48) of Defendant, Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Vanni Brown, worked for Maxim as a Home Hea

By Judge Daniel R. Bouton I am writing to advise you of the court’s ruling in connection with the above referenced case. Procedural History The case was tried ore terms on November 8, 2007. After all of the evidence was presented, the court took the case under advisement and directed counsel to submit written arguments in support of their respective positions. Subse

Brown, J. The narrow issue before us is whether a specific bequest of certain real property was adeemed by actions taken by the testator before her death but after she had executed her will. We conclude that there was a substantial change in the form of the real property at issue such that the Probate and Family Court judge’s conclusion that the bequest had been adeemed is correct. Background. On Jul

[Cite as State v. Rose, 2022-Ohio-4041.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2022-A-0040 Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas JOHN R. ROSE,

599 S.E.2d 673 (2004) 215 W.Va. 250 Linn ROSE and Adam Rose, By and Through his mother and legal guardian, Linn Rose, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, and Stephen Brown, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Joseph KATARINCIC, Esq., Carl DePasquale, Esq., and Chad A. Ciccone, Esq., Third-Party Defendants Below. No. 31317. Supreme Cou

283 S.W.3d 224 (2008) Patricia BROWN, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Steven Brown, Deceased, Appellant, v. NATIONAL HEALTH CARE OF POCAHONTAS, INC., d/b/a Randolph County Medical Center, Tina Hall, Mary Craig, Rose Throesch, Dr. Jeff Hall, John Doe # 1, and John Doe # 2, Appellees. No. CA 07-583. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. April 16, 2008.

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D22-1369 LT Case Nos. 2019-CP-058938 2011-CP-053637 2012-CP-024994 _____________________________ GEORGE DORA, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF MARY ROSE MORRISON, the surviving spouse of PAUL DOUGLAS MORRISON, and as Co- Trustee of t

[Cite as State v. Rose, 2022-Ohio-3197.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2021-A-0015 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas JOHN R. ROSE,

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 14, 2016. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00398-CV ROSE MARY BOLDEN, DARLENE THOMAS, AND RUFUS GENE CHILDS, Appellants V. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE CO., Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dunte Elair Rose appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Rose, No. 5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4 (W.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2016); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4t

ROSE FORD, ) ) Respondent, ) No. SD36080 ) vs. ) Filed: February 19, 2020 ) SKAGGS CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, ) ) Appellant.