Cases

PER CURIAM. Barry Lavell Amos seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A p

726 F.Supp. 561 (1989) Re IUE AFL-CIO PENSION FUND, et al. v. LOCKE MACHINE COMPANY, A DIVISION OF U.S. COMPONENTS CORP., et al. Civ. A. No. 89-1929. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 29, 1989. Christopher J. Koller, Rosner & Feltman, P.C., River Edge, N.J., and Ronald E. Richman and Timothy Kebbe, Chadbourne & Parke, New York City, for p

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Appellant, Betty Porter, appeals from the February 20, 2008 judgment entry of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, granting the motions for summary judgment of appellees, Dominic Baragona, d.b.a. Baragona Mid-America Events ("Baragona"), and Bockelman's Landscape and Garden Center ("Bockelman's"). {¶ 2} On Feb

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-841C (Filed Under Seal: October 30, 2020) (Reissued: November 9, 2020) 1 ************************** * AMPERSAND CHOWCHILLA * American Recovery and BIOMASS, LLC, and MERCED * Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”); Pub. POWER, LLC,

423 F.Supp.2d 229 (2006) Semen LEYKIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AT & T CORPORATION; Cox Communications, Inc.; Comcast Cable Communications, Inc.; Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers; C. Michael Armstrong; Mark McE achen; George Bell; Frank Ianna; Mohan Gyani; Charles H. Noski; Daniel H. Somers; John C. Petrillo; L. John Doerr; Thomas A. Jermoluk; William R. Hearst, III; Raymond Liguori; John C. Ma

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A22-0748 A24-1754 Hennepin County Moore, III, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: September 3, 2025

[Cite as State v. Handyside, 2019-Ohio-2329.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 107586 v. : JOHN HANDYSIDE, III :

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 25, 2007 Session PAUL WELCOME v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 69872 Mary Beth Leibowitz, Judge No. E2006-02022-CCA-R3-PC - Filed November 28, 2007 The petitioner, Paul Welcome, appeals the denial of his petitions for post-con

[Cite as Dueck v. Clifton Club Co., 2017-Ohio-7161.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 103868 and 103888 ARTHUR P. DUECK, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS

[Cite as State ex rel. Jeffers v. Athens Cty. Commrs., 2016-Ohio-8119.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ATHENS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., : RICHARD JEFFERS, : : Case No. 15CA27 Plaintiff/Relator-Appellant, : : vs. :

728 F.Supp.2d 628 (2010) WALTHOUR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHILD AND YOUTH SERVICES, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-03660. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 14, 2010. *630 Victor Walthour, Sr., Thornton, PA, pro se. Suzanne McDonough, Holsten & Associates, Media, PA, Michael Daley, Philadelp

756 F.Supp.2d 1113 (2010) ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO., INC., et. al., Defendants. Ronald Covin, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. CV-09-8162-PCT-GMS, CV-09-8174-PCT-GMS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. November 4, 2010. *112

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-1486 CLOUD CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HASBRO, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dist

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff, Lynnea Wesley-Dickson, brings this action against Warwick Valley Central School District (the “School District”), Christine Fox, Marijane Reinhard, and Kathy Carmody (collectively, the “defendants”). Defendants Fox, Reinhard, and Carmody are allegedly sued in their individual and official capacities. The plaintiff, an African-Amer

730 F.Supp. 1001 (1990) Lorraine BEGAY, Plaintiff, v. Donald HODEL, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 85-1689-PHX-CAM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. January 24, 1990. *1002 *1003 Pamela Liberty, Salese & McCarthy, P.C., Tucson, Ariz., Gary F. Smith and Robert Edward Finkelstein, DNA

ORDER G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing the Claims of Non-Party Bondholders (Doc. 644) and the Underwriters’ Motion to Exclude the Report and Testimony of Robert M. Smith (Doc. 774). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and the Motion to Exclude is denied with

WINTER, Chief Judge: This appeal arises out of a copyright action alleging infringement of appellant’s copyright in a user’s guide and audiotape developed for its Nicorette-brand gum. Appellees, in obtaining approval to sell a competing generic nicotine gum product, were directed by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to use labeling almost identical to appellant’s copyrighted guide and tape. The FDA acted purs

743 F.Supp.2d 305 (2010) AVENTIS PHARMA S.A., and Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, Plaintiffs, v. HOSPIRA, INC., Defendant. Aventis Pharma S.A., and Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Apotex, Inc., and Apotex Corp., Defendants. C.A. Nos. 07-721-GMS, 08-496-GMS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. September 27, 2010. *3

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: In November 2000, a grand jury returned a 158-count superseding indictment against sixteen defendants. The indictment alleged that, during the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, those defendants conspired to run a large-scale and violent nareotics-distribution business centered in Washington, D.C. The de

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Criminal No. 81-306 (PLF) v. ) , ) JOHN W. HINCKLEY, JR. ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER This matter came before the Court upon an agreement by the Government and Mr. John Hinckley for his unconditional release from his commitment. On September 27, 2021, the Court held a status conference at which counsel for the Government and counsel for Mr. Hinckley discussed Mr. Hinckley’s present mental stability and