Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. This case concerns the efforts of pro se Plaintiff Samuel Acosta, a federal prisoner, to obtain documents about himself from assorted government agencies through the Freedom of Information Act. On April 17, 2013, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion dismissing a number of

Opinion KLINE, P. J. Appellants, unemployed California residents previously employed as farmworkers or in other low wage or minimum wage jobs, experienced significant delays in receiving benefits due them under the California unemployment compensation program (Unemp. Ins. Code, § 100 et seq.), suffering significant hardships as a result. In 2008, they sought a writ of mandate from the San Francisco Superior Co

678 F.3d 470 (2012) Susan A. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACOSTA SALES AND MARKETING, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 11-3617. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 13, 2012. Decided March 13, 2012. *471 Nicholas F. Esposito (argued), Attorney, Esposito & Staubus, Burr Ridg

OPINION J. WOODFIN JONES, Chief Justice. Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. (“the Alliance”) appeals a final judgment rendered by the district court after the court had stricken the Alliance’s plea in intervention. In a single issue, the Alliance contends that the court abused its discretion in granting the City’s motion to strike its plea in intervention and therefore its judgment should be rever

NUMBER 13-19-00121-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ROSE MARY G. SANCHEZ AND NOE G. SANCHEZ, Appellants, v. CHRISTOPHER PAUL MONTALVO A/K/A CHRIS MONTALVO AND MADCHRIS, LLC, Appellees.

NUMBER 13-19-00121-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ROSE MARY G. SANCHEZ AND NOE G. SANCHEZ, Appellants, v. CHRISTOPHER PAUL MONTALVO A/K/A CHRIS MONTALVO AND MADCHRIS, LLC, Appellees.

PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Nery F. Camacho-Rodriguez, a United States postal service letter carrier, and members of his family sued the Postmaster General of the United States and a postal service employee for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. The plaintiffs asserted that the postal service failed reasonably to accommodate Camacho for a

ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE TO SECRETARY MELTON, District Judge. This cause is before the Court pursuant to plaintiff’s action seeking review of the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. This matter was considered by the United States Magistrate, pursuant to standing order concerning assignment of social security cases.

THIRD DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., GOBEIL and HODGES, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 28, 2019

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibbe F. Payne, J.), entered December 14, 2006, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The trial court properly directed a verdict in favor of defendant at the close of plaintiffs case in this action where plaintiff was injured when she fell as she descended a tiled ramp in defendant’s subway station during the course of an ongoing snowstorm, as it is unreasonable to requ

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: In this diversity medical malpractice action, appellant Hospital Presbiteriano de la Comunidad, Inc. (“appellant”) appeals from a judgment entered August 26, 1985 on a jury verdict in the District of Puerto Rico, Raymond L. Acosta, District Judge, awarding appellee Marjorie Marie Valedon

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Henry Oswaldo Miranda, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) order reversing an Immigration Judge's (IJ) decision granting Miranda withholding of removal. We deny the petition. On December 12, 2011, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) charged Miranda with removal as an alie

[Cite as Davis v. 40 East, L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-4505.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA SHAKORIE DAVIS, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 111329 v. : 40 EAST, L.L.C., ET AL,

, KKHBHZ Roger Dale Dean TDCJ No. 01068114; Mark W. Michael Unit 2664 FM 2054, Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886-5000 July 15, 2015 RECEVED\N Abel Acosta, Clerk C@URTOFCRWMNALAPPEALS Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas _ Post Office Box 12308 ' JUL 23 2015 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 pa k \ l P .` § @T' RE: Ex parte Roger Dale Dean ‘L“B@°AUGS ’d Case-No; WR-83,113-02 Trial Court No. 0852518-A 183rd Judicial District Court' Dear Hon. Clerk: Enclosed for filing with the Court of Criminal

33 F.Supp.2d 1027 (1999) Lorna G. MADDIN, Plaintiff, v. GTE OF FLORIDA, INC., Defendant. No. 97-1648-CIV-T-17A. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. January 27, 1999. *1028 James David Acosta, Acosta & Rose, P.A., Tampa, FL, for plaintiff. Gregory Alan Hearing, Thomas M. Gonzalez, Richard L. Brad

Peters, P.J. *1427Based upon that conduct, petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that respondent had committed the family offenses of aggravated harassment in the second degree and stalking. Thereafter, Family Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the stalking offense and the cause of action for aggravated harassment in the second degree proceeded to

Morton v North Shore Univ. Hosp. (2025 NY Slip Op 06702) Morton v North Shore Univ. Hosp. 2025 NY Slip Op 06702 Decided on December 3, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Peters, P.J. *1427Based upon that conduct, petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that respondent had committed the family offenses of aggravated harassment in the second degree and stalking. Thereafter, Family Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the stalking offense and the cause of action for aggravated harassment in the second degree proceeded to

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Cohen-Gallet, R.), dated June 7, 2004, which, after a trial, awarded permanent physical and legal custody of the parties’ child to the mother. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. In making a custody determination, the court, after reviewing the totality of the circ

137 F.Supp.2d 1212 (2001) Sandra ALFONSO, Plaintiff, v. GTE DIRECTORIES CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 99CV1422-AA. United States District Court, D. Oregon. March 19, 2001. *1213 *1214 *1215 Tom Steenson, Zan Tewksbury, Steenson, Schumann, Tewksbury & Rose