Cases

231 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir. 2000) FLORIAN SEVER; DAVID HIEBERT; MARK W. SIMMONS; ROBERT HENRY KINVILLE; EDWARD REINER; UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioners,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,andALASKA PULP CORPORATION, Respondent-Intervenor.ALASKA PULP CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,andFLORIAN SEVER; DAVID HIEBERT; MARK W. SIMMONS; ROBERT HENRY

Prost, Chief Judge. Omaha Steaks International, Inc. ("Omaha Steaks") appeals a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") dismissing its opposition (No. 91213527) to Greater Omaha Packing Co., Inc.'s ("GOP") application to register the mark "GREATER OMAHA PROVIDING THE HIGHEST QUALITY BEEF" ("Opposed Mark") for meat, including boxed beef primal cuts. The Board concluded

McKAY, Circuit Judge. Following a lengthy administrative hearing process, Plaintiff was fired from his tenured teaching position at the University of Kansas School of Law for allegedly engaging in a sex act with one of his students after discussing grades. He subsequently sued the University, the Board of Regents, and numerous University administrators and professors in their offi

924 F.Supp. 1084 (1996) Emil A. TONKOVICH, Plaintiff, v. KANSAS BOARD OF REGENTS, et al., Defendants. No. 95-2199. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 30, 1996. *1085 J. Charles Droege, Overland Park, KS, Mark J. Bredemeier, Jerald L. Hill, Richard P. Hutchison, Kansas City, MO, for Emil A. Tonkovich. Kevin D. C

281 Kan. 538 (2006) STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TIMOTHY A. ROBINSON, II, Appellant. No. 91,875. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 28, 2006. Shawn E. Minihan, assistant appellate defender, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant. Bobby J. Hiebert, Jr., assistant county attorney, argued the cause, and Ellen Mitchell,</

910 N.E.2d 1134 (2009) 391 Ill. App.3d 722 ALPHA SCHOOL BUS COMPANY, INC., and Cook-Illinois Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael W. WAGNER, Barbara Ann Hackel, Southwest Transit, Inc., and Southwest Transit Leasing, LLC., Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-06-3427. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. May 15, 2009.

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE LARSON, sitting for JUSTICE RICE, delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Bryan Lee (“Lee”) appeals from a summary judgment order entered for Great Divide Insurance Company (“Great Divide”) by the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County. We consider the following issue on appeal: Did the District Court properly grant summary judgm

Opinion Tsoucalas, Judge: On July 25, 1994, pursuant to Rule 65(b) of the Rules of this Court, National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America, Inc. (“NCBFAA”) requested, and the Court granted, a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). Plaintiff sought to enjoin the Department of the Treasury and the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) from implementing the interim regulations publ

The opinion of the court was delivered by Biles, J.: After Kerry Jenkins was convicted of misdemeanor theft in municipal court for violating a Wichita city ordinance, his conviction was vacated and he was charged with and convicted of felony theft in state district court for the same offense. Jenkins argues double jeopardy attached to the municipal court proceeding, so the State’s felony theft prosecution is

159 F.3d 504 130 Ed. Law Rep. 441, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 79 Emil A. TONKOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.KANSAS BOARD OF REGENTS, Robert C. Caldwell, Tom E. Hammond,John B. Hiebert, Karen Krepps, John G. Montgomery, PhyllisNolan, Frank C. Sabatini, Sidney Warner, Gene A. Budig,Delbert M. Shankel, P. Delbert Brinkman, David E.Shulenburger, Robert H. Jerry, Ii, Sidney A. Shapiro,Reginald L. Robinson, A. Ki

HENRY, Circuit Judge. This is a consolidation of seven separate appeals spawned by one district court case. Professor Emil Tonkovich, a law professor at the University of Kansas School of Law (“the Law School”), filed a complaint challenging his dismissal, alleging under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that the University violated his First Amendment speech rights, and his Fourteenth Amendment

714 S.E.2d 201 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Rashamell Q. BILLINGER, Defendant. No. COA10-1412. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 5, 2011. *203 Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General John A. Payne, for the State. Thomas R. Sallenger, for defendant-appellant. HUNTER, ROBERT C., Judge.</

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,713 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BRENNAN R. TRASS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, applicable

*878OPINION Per Curiam: On August 7, 1971, Dixie Duboise made a U-turn and crossed in front of a vehicle driven by Hobart Abney, causing a collision.1 Hobart and his wife, Viola, were injured. Duboise was uninsured. Pursuant to a settlement agreement, the Abneys’ insurer, State Farm Mutual Aut

679 F.Supp. 1011 (1988) Martha ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 84-1226-T. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 18, 1988. *1012 David H.M. Gray of Gragert, Hiebert & Gray, Wichita, Kan., for plaintiff. Benjamin L. Burgess, Jr., U.S.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.895 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY.895 III. RELEVANT FACTS.895 IV. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS.899 V. ANALYSIS. CD M

JUSTICE LEAPHART delivered the Opinion of the Court. Edwin A. Taylor (Taylor) appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court determining that two of three workers’ compensation claims filed by Taylor were fraudulent. We affirm. We consider the following dispositive issues on appeal: <

885 F.Supp. 1457 (1995) T.S.I. HOLDINGS, INC., and New Progress, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. John C. BUCKINGHAM and Cincinnati Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 94-2147-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 6, 1995. *1458 William W. Humphrey, III, Rose, Brouillette & Shapiro, P.C., Kansas City, MO, for plaintiffs.

30 Cal.App.4th 1 (1994) 35 Cal. Rptr.2d 725 DONALD GORDON BLACK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.T. & S.A. et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. A057561. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. November 15, 1994. *2 COUNSEL Donald Gordon Blac

SNEED, Circuit Judge: Florian Sever, et al. (the “Employees”) and the Alaska Pulp Corporation (“Alaska Pulp”) have separately petitioned this court to review an order that the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB” or the “Board”) issued against Alaska Pulp on August 27, 1998. See Alaska Pulp Corp., 326 NLRB No. 59, 1998 WL 600786, at *1 (“Alaska Pulp III”). The order describes how Alaska Pulp is to c