Cases

Opinion by Woodside, J., This appeal questions the legality of a tax resolution passed by a township of the second class subsequent to the adoption of a budget in which the receipts from the tax were not contemplated. On March 3, 1952 the Supervisors of the Township of .Rose in Jefferson County adopted a budget for the fiscal year beginning on the first Monday of January 1952 and ending on

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. E.M. is a student at the Learning Center for Exceptional Children ■ (“LCEC”). LCEC is a private school for children with • intellectual disabilities. E.M.’s individualized education program — her federally-mandated education plan created by her parents, teachers, and local public-school system — says that she should attend L.CEC and integrated classes with students fr

Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. This case arises out of a property-tax dispute regarding ownership of tangible personal property. Based on Sebastian Cotton & Grain Ltd.'s representation that it owned grain inventory stored on its property, Willacy County Appraisal District (WCAD) listed Sebastian as the owner of the grain on the 2009 appraisal roll. After receiving the tax bill, Sebastian requested a correction

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 16-0626 444444444444 WILLACY COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, PETITIONER, v. SEBASTIAN COTTON & GRAIN, LTD., RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED NOVEMB ER SESSION, 1997 March 4, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9610-CR-00445 ) Appellee, ) )

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–45 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are r

r~—————— r TIT• [HflWIIW Mil I —TT—~—-T*TTTf FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS APPEAL No. 14-14-00410

Opinion by Mr. Justice Cohen, Appellant, Nugent Mining Company, paid taxes under protest upon coal mined and loaded on its premises. In the protests accompanying these tax payments appellant claimed that its coal tipple was not within the boundaries of the appellee, Snyder Township School District (School District), but rather that it was located in the adjacent Township of Washington. The School District had

WILLIAMS, J., This matter is before the court on respondents’ preliminary objections *398to a petition for declaratory judgment instituted by petitioner in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Easton. Respondents are the members of the council of that city. The preliminary objections are in the nature of a demurrer, a motion for a more specific complaint and “misjoinder o

DISSENTING OPINION GARB, J., I most respectfully dissent. We have before us for disposition defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence resulting from a breathalyzer test administered him pursuant to the Act of December 22, 1969, P. L. 392 sec. 1, 75 PS §624.1, he having been indicted for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of the Act of April 2

432 F.Supp.2d 862 (2006) In the matter of AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES, et al., Defendants. Nos. 4:03 CV 90074(Lead), 4:02 CV 90447, 4:03 CV 90101. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa. June 2, 2006. *863 *864 Alex

ACCEPTED 03-14-00765-CV 4402607 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

Opinion by Eevin, P. J., This case involves one major and two subordinate issues. The annexation petition to the borough council specifically stated that it was filed pursuant to art. IY, §425 of The Borough Code (Act of May 4, 1927, P. L. 519, 53 PS §45425), and the proceedings followed the requirements of that act. The appellants contend that these provisions were repealed by implication by the Act of July 20

Hirt, P. J., The civil service board for the City of Erie gave notice by advertisement of an examination of applicants for the position of fire alarm operator to be held on September 5, 1936. Petitioner, an honorably discharged sailor who served in the United States Navy during the World War, filed an application with the secretary of the board in response to the advertisement,, on August 29, 1936. Because pe

TABLE OF CONTENTS ORDER PAGE Minute Order (1/3/07) 831 Order on Motions for Summary Judgment (1/3/07) 831 Order on Motion for Reconsideration (1/17/07) 841 Stipulation of Plaintiffs and State of Washington regarding Scope of Subproeeeding, and Order (1/29/07) 845 Joint Motion for Order and Consent Decree Approving Settlement Agre

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In 1998, the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida held a trial—Phase I of the Engle class action—to determine whether the largest domestic tobacco companies (the- “Engle defendants”) engaged *1192in conduct proscribed by Florida tort law.1

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

No. 01-14-00707-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 10/30/2015 1:52:16 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE at HOUSTON, TEXAS Clerk –––––––––

Long, P. J., This is an appeal by Parson-Marnatti Post No. 95 of the American Legion, Brockway, Pa., from the order of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board refusing its application for a club liquor license. On the hearing before the court no witnesses appeared and testified, except appellant’s adjutant and its commander. All other facts hereinafter stated were agreed upon by stipulation of counsel. From the e