Cases

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge. Petitioner Marie Baran (“Baran”) filed this motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 (“Section 2255”) to vacate, set aside, or otherwise correct her conviction and sentence. (“Motion,” Dkt. No. 800.) Bar-an is currently serving a sentence of sixty (60) months imprisonment after a jury found her guilty of four counts of conspiracy

FISHER, Circuit Judge: Rosario Gutierrez appeals the district court’s denial of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), after she prevailed in her appeal in this court reversing the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) denial of disability benefits. See Gutierrez v. Apfel, 199 F.3d 1048 (2000) (Gutierrez I)

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: Social Security regulations require an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to fill out and attach to each decision, “in any case where there is evidence which indicates the existence of a mental impairment,” 42 U.S.C. § 421(h), a psychiatric review technique form (PRTF) evaluating the severity of mental impairments. The regulations provide in relevant part

ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS YOUNG, District Judge. This Entry addresses the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on the Schmitts’ & Comp-tons’ Title to the Abandoned Railroad Right-Of-Way; (2) Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment; and (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. For the rea

395 F.Supp. 1192 (1975) Christobal ROSARIO v. AMERICAN EXPORT-ISBRANDTSEN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES of America. Civ. A. No. 71-768. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. Memorandum and Order July 25, 1974. Findings and Conclusions April 2, 1975. *1193 Robert C. Daniels, Philadelphia, Pa., f

TABLE OF CONTENTS ORDER PAGE Summary of Memorandum Order and Preliminary Injunction Re Salmon Allocation for 1978 and Subsequent Seasons (8/11/78, as corrected 8/16/78 and amended 9/27/78 and 10/27/78) 1416 Additional Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Re Makah v. Lower Elwha Dispute Re Hoko River (11/28/78) 1418 Order Re Coastal Salmon Fisherie

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises tricky questions of the limits on federal court jurisdiction under 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(6), a provision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-104,110 Stat. 56. Two telecommunications companies (one primarily a landline local exchange carrier and one a cellular carrier) reached an interconnection agreeme

626 F.Supp. 1405 (1985) UNITED STATES of America et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 9213. United States District Court, W.D. Washington. *1406 *1407 *1408 *1409

*1026TABLE OF CONTENTS ORDER PAGE Decision, Injunction and Order Re State Court Injunctions Preventing Enforcement of Certain Department of Fisheries Regulations (9/12/74) 1028 Order for Program to Implement Interim Plan (10/8/74, 11/21/74, 8/6/75 and 4/5/76) 1°35 Order Directing Prompt No

459 F.Supp. 1020 (1978) UNITED STATES of America et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE of WASHINGTON et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 9213—Phase I. United States District Court, W. D. Washington. Through June 30, 1978. *1021 *1022 *1023 *10

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, dissenting. John Moore ran afoul of a statute providing that “no person shall circulate or certify petitions for candidates of more than one political party ... to be voted upon at the next primary or general election.” Ill. Rev.Stat. eh. 46 § 10-4. The court has asked the Supreme Court of Illinois to tell us whether § 10-4 applies to signatures gathered by (as well as for) a candi

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1474 MARÍA S. DÍAZ-BÁEZ; VÍCTOR A. BURGOS-TORRES; THELMA L. PÉREZ- GUZMÁN; MARISOL DOMÍNGUEZ-RIVERA; HÉCTOR J. ALBELO-CARTAGENA; MÓNICA MOLINA-SALAS; RAMÓN L. RIVERA-GASCOT; SYLVIA ALVARADO- HERNÁNDEZ; PEDRO R. MARTÍNEZ-AGOSTO; CARMEN E. MEDINA-ADORNO; PEDRO I. CARTAGENA-RODRÍGUEZ; EDUARDO BARREIRO-DIAZ; MELIXA MARRERO-GONZÁLEZ; MERCEDES LAMBERTY-ROMÁN; CARLOS A. AQUINO- VALENTÍN; DEBBIE

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DEBORAH A. BATTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Marshall R. Mazyck (“Plaintiff’ or “Mazyck”), an African-American male, together with eight African-American plaintiffs and one Hispanic plaintiff, all of whom are current or former employees of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA” or “Defendant”) Police Department (“MTA PD”), commenced this action against the MTA and four M

97 F.Supp.2d 437 (2000) Donald PARKER, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, Metropolitan Transportation Authority Police Benevolent Association, Metro-North Police Benevolent Association, Railroad Police Benevolent Association and Robert Novy, Defendants. No. 99 Civ. 3032 (CM) (LMS). United States District Court, S.D. New York.

367 F.Supp.2d 548 (2005) Marshall GARVIN, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. 00 Civ. 6789(JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 22, 2005. *549 *550 *551

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the motion for class certification brought by plaintiffs Greg Cima, Diana Peek, Linda McMahon, Mike Beard, Sharon Beard, John Beckwith, Jr, and Stephen Jellen (Doc. 152).1 For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. I. Introduction As

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: A group of local phone companies (known as “local exchange carriers,” or “LECs”) seek review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) holding them liable for violating the unreasonable charge provisions of 47 U.S.C. § 201(b)

OPINION Justice ROBINSON, for the Court. This case is a federal maritime action 1 in which Jody King, the plaintiff, raised claims for maintenance and cure; negligence under the federal Jones Act, as codified in 46 U.S.C. § 30104; and “breach of the warranty of seaworthiness.”

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HART, District Judge. Two related cases have been assigned to this bench. The Anderson case (97 C 7556) contains claims by 47 African-American women that they were improperly searched when going through customs at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, Illinois. The Sixth Amended Complaint in Anderson specifically names 59 employees of the United

OPINION AND ORDER CRABB, District Judge. This is a civil action for monetary relief brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs David Blihovde, Travis Brecher and Renee Houser and all others similarly situated allege that defendants Mark Volz, Kristen Anderson, Terry Larson, Lisa Opel, Shelby Lane and John and Jane Does 1-30 subjected plaintiffs to strip searches without reasonable suspicion in violati