Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Root v. Howard”
Root v. Englandpublic domain
291 S.W.3d 834 (2009) Carolyn ROOT, et al., Appellants, v. Robert ENGLAND, et al., Respondents. No. WD 70351. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. August 4, 2009. *835 James A. Rahm, Carrollton, MO, Attorney for Appellants, Carolyn Root, Terry L. Mabrey, and Shirley Gotmer. Donald G. Stouffer and Joby Jason Raines,
Root ex rel. Root v. Muddpublic domain
SMART, Judge. This case, which arises out of a collision between a ear and a nine-year-old girl riding a bicycle, requires that we address issues related to the degree of care which must be exercised by a child bicyclist and the reference point of that standard of care. Tami Root, by and through her next Mend, Paul Root, appeals the trial court’s entry of judgment after a jury verdict allocating five percent of the fault in
Lisa Kelley v. Nathaniel Rootpublic domain
01/29/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 12, 2023 Session LISA KELLEY ET AL. v. NATHANIEL ROOT ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for McNairy County No. 2019-CV-12 J. Weber McCraw, Judge ___________________________________
United States ex rel. Howard v. KBR, Inc.public domain
ORDER Michael M. Mihm, United States District Judge Now before the Court is KBR, Inc. and Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.’s (collectively referred to as “KBR” or “Defendants”)1 Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, KBR’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) is DENIED. <
James C. Howard, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginiapublic domain
BUMGARDNER, Judge. James C. Howard, Jr. appeals his convictions of burglary, Code § 18.2-91, and grand larceny, Code § 18.2-95. He maintains the trial court did not have jurisdiction because he was improperly indicted and the indictment was not properly recorded in the order book for the trial court. Finding the procedures followed by
Brown & Root, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Boardpublic domain
333 F.3d 628 BROWN & ROOT, INC., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. No. 01-60635. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 24, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Howard S. Linzy (argued), Robert Peter Lombardi, The Kullman Firm, New Orleans, LA, for Brown &
Root v. County of Onondagapublic domain
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claim based upon an alleged violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). *1015We have consistently held that absolute liability under that section may be imposed only upon a showing that the inj
Teri Root v. Talton Toneypublic domain
WATERMAN, Justice. This appeal presents two issues of first impression: (1) whether our court’s order closing the clerk of court’s public window at 2:30 p.m. triggered Iowa Code section 4.1(34) (2011) to allow a one-day extension of the deadline to file a notice of appeal, and (2) whether a person fleeing domestic abuse who relocates to live in a new county satisfies the residen
Jenkins v. Howard Universitypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIMOTHY L. JENKINS, et al. : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 22-0874 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 7, 18 : HOWARD UNIVE
Root v. Percypublic domain
504 F.Supp. 659 (1980) Howard Leroy ROOT, Petitioner, v. Donald E. PERCY, Respondent. No. 80-C-953. United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. December 31, 1980. James R. Glover, Shellow & Shellow, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Bronson C. LaFollette, Atty. Gen. by Thomas J. Balistreri, Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, Wis., for respondent.
Tony Evers v. Howard Markleinpublic domain
2025 WI 36 TONY EVERS, et al., Petitioners, v. HOWARD MARKLEIN, et al., Respondents. No. 2023AP2020-OA Decided July 8, 2025 ORIGINAL ACTION KAROFSKY, C.J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which ANN WALSH BR
Howard v. Iomaxis, LLCpublic domain
Howard v. IOMAXIS, LLC, 2021 NCBC 82. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 18 CVS 11679 KELLY C. HOWARD and FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE RONALD E. HOWARD REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2016, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND
Root v. SDI of Owassopublic domain
BAY MITCHELL, Presiding Judge. ' 1 Plaintiffs Michael Root and Erin Root, as Parents and Next Friend of Cody Root, a minor, ("Roots") seek review of the trial court's order dismissing the case without prejudice 1 upon its grant of Defendant SDI of Owasso, d/b/a Sonie's ("Sonic") Motion to Dismiss for Roots failure to comply with the trial court's order requiring Roots to submit to deposition pursu
Tony Evers v. Howard Markleinpublic domain
2024 WI 31 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2023AP2020-OA COMPLETE TITLE: Tony Evers Governor of Wisconsin, Department of Natural Resources, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Department of Safety and Professional Services and Marriage
Howard v. Goldbloompublic domain
Tucher, J. *661Defendants appeal an order of the trial court denying their petition to compel arbitration. They contend the claims asserted by plaintiff Jeremy Howard arose out of his employment relationship with Kaggle, Inc. (Kaggle, or the company), of which he was president and remains a minority shareholder. We shall affirm the order. <
Tony Evers v. Howard Markleinpublic domain
2024 WI 31 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2023AP2020-OA COMPLETE TITLE: Tony Evers Governor of Wisconsin, Department of Natural Resources, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Department of Safety and Professional Services and Marriage
Howard v. Goldbloompublic domain
Filed 12/21/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JEREMY HOWARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, A154298 v. ANTHONY GOLDBLOOM, et al., (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. C
Darryl Howard v. Darrell Dowdypublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1719 Doc: 44 Filed: 05/30/2023 Pg: 1 of 50 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1684 DARRYL HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF DURHAM; DARRELL DOWDY, in his individual and official capacities; MICHELE SOUCIE,
65 F.Supp.2d 1264 (1999) Curtis A. WELLS, on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Plaintiff, v. BROWN & ROOT, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 99-0635-CB-M. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. August 4, 1999. *1265 *1266 Lesley A. Troope, Andrea J. Goetze, Mi
In re the Marriage of Howardpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0278 Filed June 18, 2025 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF KENNETH M. HOWARD AND ANNA V. HOWARD Upon the Petition of KENNETH M. HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, And Concerning ANNA V. HOWARD, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Coleman McAllister, Judge. A