Cases

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-05-00021-CV ___________________

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-05-00021-CV ___________________

Zhao Ming Lu v Jackson Ht. Roosevelt Dev. II, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 05371) Zhao Ming Lu v Jackson Ht. Roosevelt Dev. II, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 05371 Decided on October 30, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State

PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEALDenied.

199 P.3d 1072 (2009) 2009 WY 5 Thomas WITOWSKI, Appellant (Defendant), v. Gayle (Witowski) ROOSEVELT, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. S-08-0074. Supreme Court of Wyoming. January 22, 2009. *1074 Representing Appellant: Robert E. Schroth of Schroth & Schroth, LLC, Jackson, Wyoming. Representing Appelle

2007 WY 70 THOMAS WITOWSKI, Appellant (Defendant), v. GAYLE (WITOWSKI) ROOSEVELT, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 06-141 Supreme Court of Wyoming. APRIL TERM, A.D. 2007. April 27, 2007 Representing Appellant: Robert E. Schroth of Schroth & Schroth, LLC, Jackson, Wyoming. Representing Appellee: David G. Lewis, Jackson, Wyoming. VOIGT, C.J., and GOLDEN, HI

OPINION OF THE COURT Sullivan, J. On February 22, 2002 at about 6:30 p.m., near the end of his work shift, plaintiff, a utility worker employed by Aramark Educational Services, the exclusive food services contractor for the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT), slipped and fell on a food substance near the freight elevator on the fifth floor at an FIT facility in Manhattan, thereby sustaining injuries. He the

744 F.Supp.2d 151 (2010) THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. Ken SALAZAR[1], et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. 08-1047 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 29, 2010. *153 Donald G. Blankenau, Thomas R. Wilmoth, Blankenau Wilmoth LLP, Lincoln, NE, for Plaintiff.

In re Jackson, Roosevelt et ah; Jackson, Johnettte; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 99-18949; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2005-CA-1213. Denied.

STEVENSON, J. This is an appeal from an order dismissing with prejudice Dr. Roosevelt Jackson’s eight-count “Supplemental Third Amended” complaint naming as defendants North Broward Hospital District and nine colleagues. The complaint essentially stemmed from the suspension of Jackson’s hospital privileges in 1988 and 1992 and the termination of those privileges in 1995. We affirm the order of dismissal in all respects except

(2008) Andrea SORRENTINO, D'Angelo and Patricia Jackson, Louis Apa, Steven Andelman, Peedo and Saifon Pituk, Manny Delmas and Barbara Lindon, Chandeep Sodhi, Jaspreet Sodhi, Jaclyn Tesoriero, Kimberly Cilone, Marie Varallo, and Hsiangchi Hsu, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ASN ROOSEVELT CENTER, LLC d/b/a Archstone Westbury, Archstone Smith Communities LLC, Archstone Smith Operatin

584 F.Supp.2d 529 (2008) Andrea SORRENTINO, D'Angelo and Patricia Jackson, Louis Apa, Steven Andelman, Peedo and Saifon Pituk, Manny Delmas and Barbara Lindon, Chandeep Sodhi, Jaspreet Sodhi, Jaclyn Tesoriero, Kimberly Cilone, Marie Varallo, and Hsiangchi Hsu, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ASN ROOSEVELT CENTER, LLC d/b/a Archstone Westbury, Archstone Smith Communities LLC, Archst

(2008) Andrea SORRENTINO, D'Angelo and Patricia Jackson, Louis Apa, Steven Andelman, Peedo and Saifon Pituk, Manny Delmas and Barbara Lindon, Chandeep Sodhi, Jaspreet Sodhi, Jaclyn Tesoriero, Kimberly Cilone, Marie Varallo, and Hsiangchi Hsu, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ASN ROOSEVELT CENTER, LLC d/b/a Archstone Westbury, Archstone Smith Communities LLC, Archstone Smith Operatin

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered April 7, 1994, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the trial court improperly granted the People’s motion to amend the indictment to delete the language that the defendant ha

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated August 5, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant 78-14 Roosevelt, Inc., d/b/a Jackson Shopping Plaza, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered September 27, 1999, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against tha

This is a divorce case. The parties were married in 1961. Three children were born of the marriage, all of whom have reached majority; however, during the marriage the parties adopted their grandchild, who was five years old at the time of the divorce. On October 25, 1995, the wife sued for a divorce, alleging the grounds of adultery, incompatibility of temperament, and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. The husband counterclaimed for a divorce. The case was tried

ORDER: (1) GRANTING HONEYWELL’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (2) GRANTING CORNING’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (3) GRANTING UNIVAR’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (k) GRANTING SRP’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (5) GRANTING DOLPHIN’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (6) DENYING ARVIN AND COOPER’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge. On May 2, 2011, the Court heard Defendant Honeywell International, Inc.’s Motion t

*1163 PER CURIAM: Dr. Roosevelt P. Jackson appeals from his conviction for income tax evasion. 1 After sentencing, Dr. Jackson’s court-appointed trial counsel filed a notice of appeal on his beha

09/21/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 8, 2021 ROOSEVELT BIGBEE v. JOHNNY FITZ, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 7185 Joe H. Walker, III, Judge ___________________________________

q?,?l?'oz Roosevelt Hollins #435032 O-B. Ellis Unit 1697 FM 980 Huntsville, Texas 77343 Date: Febuary SM!, 2015 REE Habeas Corpus No. WR-l7,722-O3 ' ’""“ Exparte Hollins, Response-PRO SE CLERK OF COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Abel Acosta P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Dear Clerk/ Enclosed please find one copy of my Response to the State's Reccomendation for my habeas corpus to be denied. Please file the same for consideration in this matter. Sincerely, (A) EX-PARTE