Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ronald Tracy”
RONALD TRACY PAYNE v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RONALD TRACY PAYNE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )
RONALD TRACY PAYNE v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RONALD TRACY PAYNE, DOC #949528, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )
United States v. Luten (Ronald Tracy)public domain
889 F.2d 1091 U.S.v.Luten (Ronald Tracy) NO. 88-5463 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. JUL 14, 1989 1 Appeal From: D.Minn. 2 AFFIRMED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TRACY GROENENDAAL, OTHER ) OCCUPANT A/K/A RONALD SORIANO, ) ) Petitioners, )
Tracy Miller v. Ronald Kingpublic domain
PER CURIAM: In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Georgia, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 877, 163 L.Ed.2d 650 (2006), we vacate in full our prior opinion in Miller v. King, 384 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir.2004), and substitute the following in its place. I. APPEAL On appeal Tracy Mill
OPINION Mackey K. Hancock, Justice Ronald Gene Parker and Melissa Dane Parker (collectively, “Parker”) appeal from orders of the trial court that dismissed their pending lawsuit against Tracy Dylan Cain, Jr. Through three issues, Parker contends that the trial court abused its discretion by: (1) failing to hold an eviden-tiary hearing on Parker’s motion to
Tracy Miller v. Ronald Kingpublic domain
384 F.3d 1248 Tracy MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,United States of America, Intervenor,v.Ronald KING, Defendant-Appellee,Wayne Garner, The State of Georgia, The Georgia Department of Corrections, Johnny Sikes, Defendants. No. 02-13348. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 14, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL
Tracy Dunlap v. Liberty Natural Productspublic domain
OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Liberty Natural Products, Inc. (Liberty) challenges the district court’s decision denying Liberty’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL). Appellee Tracy Dunlap .(Dunlap) brought suit against Liberty under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Oregon s
DeSoto County, Mississippi v. Tracy Dennispublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-IA-01982-SCT DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI v. T.D. AND AARON DENNIS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/06/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. CHAMBERLIN TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: DANIEL J. GRIFFITH JOSEPH D. NEYMAN, JR. RONALD W. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEAL
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 18, 2022 No. 04-21-00535-CV TEXAS BRANDON CORPORATION, INC. and Ronald Wilson, Appellants v. EOG, KARBUHN OIL COMPANY, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, and Al
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 27, 2021 No. 04-21-00535-CV TEXAS BRANDON CORPORATION, INC. and Ronald Wilson, Appellants v. EOG, Karbuhn Oil Company, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A.
FILE COPY Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 28, 2022 No. 04-21-00535-CV TEXAS BRANDON CORPORATION, INC. and Ronald Wilson, Appellants v. EOG, Karbuhn Oil Company, Robert E. Bran
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 15, 2022 No. 04-21-00535-CV TEXAS BRANDON CORPORATION, INC. and Ronald Wilson, Appellants v. EOG, KARBUHN OIL COMPANY, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, a
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 15, 2022 No. 04-21-00535-CV TEXAS BRANDON CORPORATION, INC. and Ronald Wilson, Appellants v. EOG, KARBUHN OIL COMPANY, Robert E. Brandt, Chad E. Brandt, Joachim K. Leicht, Dick A. Tracy, and
Payne v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Opinion issued April 3, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00089-CV ——————————— THE ESTATE OF ADAM BOYD KNETSAR, TRACY NICOLE KNETSAR, AMBER LYNN KNETSAR, LESLIE P. KNETSAR, AND RONALD B. KNETSAR, Appellants
Payne v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed.
Payne v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed.