Cases

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 18-BS-1158 IN RE RONALD D. SWANSON-CERNA Respondent, Board Docket No. 18-BD-097 Bar Registration Number 472205 DDN: 007-16 BEF

PER CURIAM On consideration of the affidavit of Ronald D. Swanson-Cerna, wherein he consents to disbarment from the bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 12, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this court, and the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is ORDERED that the said Ronald D. Swanson-Cerna is hereby disbarred by consent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is plaintiff Ron Swanson’s (“Swanson”) informative motion submitted in response to the Court’s order to show cause that the Court has in person-am jurisdiction over out-of-state defendant Kelsey Coffeen (“Coffeen”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction over d

PER CURIAM. Eugene Swanson appeals the summary denial of his amended motion to correct sentence filed in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On February 15, 1980, Swanson was found guilty of sexual battery with a deadly weapon (count one) and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon (count two). The trial court sentenced Swanson to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment1 on count

El Juez Asociado Señor Rivera García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La presente controversia se desarrolla en el contexto de la Sec. 6006(b) del Código de Rentas Internas de 1994 (13 LPRAant. see. 8026), sobre el consentimiento que prestaba un contribuyente para extender el término prescriptive dispuesto por ley para que el Departamento de Hacienda de Puerto Rico tasara una contribución. En esta ocasión, tenemo

ON REMAND Before: WHITBECK, EJ., and O’CONNELL and OWENS, JJ. Per Curiam. This matter returns to this Court on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court1 with the direction that we evaluate the merits of these appeals in light of Bush v Shabahang2 and MCL 600.2301. We reverse.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

124 F.3d 217 97 CJ C.A.R. 1732 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

RILEY, Chief Judge. Robert A. Sears and Korley B. Sears (collectively, appellants) claim to be the only present shareholders of AFY, Inc. (AFY), a debtor in bankruptcy. Rhett R. Sears, the Rhett R. Sears Revocable Trust, Ronald H. Sears, the Ron H. Sears Trust, and Dane R. Sears (collectively, appellees) made claims on AFY’s bankruptcy estate in connection with the sale of appell

ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on September 18, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particul

312 B.R. 153 (2004) In re Ronald L. SWANSON and Deborah A. Swanson, Debtors. No. 03 B 73334. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Western Division. July 14, 2004. *154 William L. Balsley, Balsley, Dahlberg and Hart, LLP, Loves Park, IL, for Debtors. Matthew C. Hicks, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D.C., for

MEMORANDUM** Ronald D. Swanson and his wife Dixie C. Swanson appeal pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law following a bench trial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the district court’s decision, and we review de novo the bankruptcy court’s conclusions of law and for clear error its findings of fact. E

172 Ariz. 579 (1992) 838 P.2d 1340 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Ronald SWANSON, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 90-1404. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. April 14, 1992. Review Denied November 3, 1992.[*] *581 Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Cou

OPINION CONNOLLY, Judge Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for misdemeanor trespassing, arguing that the property owner did not tell him to leave the property and that the plain language of the statute requires both a command to leave and a command not to return. Because the plain language of Minn. Stat. § 609.60

OPINION BJORKMAN, Judge. Appellant Ronald David Olson challenges his four convictions under Minn. Stat. § 609.352 (2012) (the child-solicitation statute). To meet an element of each offense, the state was required to prove that Olson reasonably believed that he was soliciting or communicating sexually explicit material to a person “15 years of age or youn

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Ronald D. Swanson Cerna, Marta M. Villares y la Sociedad Legal de Gananciales por estos compuesta Recurrido Certiorari v. 2015 TSPR 142 Juan Carlos Méndez, Secretario de 193 DPR ____ Hacienda, y el Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico Peticionarios Número del Caso: CC-2014-393 Fecha: 23 de octubre de 2015 Tribunal

On May 29, 2002, Ronald D. Veteto ("Veteto") sued Swanson Services Corporation ("Swanson") and, "in both their individual and official capacities," Michael Haley, commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections ("DOC"); Billie Mitchem, warden of the William E. Donaldson Correctional Facility, a prison operated under the auspices of DOC and located in Bessemer, Alabama; Hurbert Etheridge, a captain at Donaldson; and Officer Marion C. Espy, a correctional officer

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RONALD SWANSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 85205 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE S

200 P.3d 657 (2008) 2008 UT App 474 VICTOR PLASTERING, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SWANSON BUILDING MATERIALS, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellee. No. 20070486-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. December 26, 2008. *658 Ronald Ady, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Arnold Richer and Darci D. Tolbert

90 P.3d 418 (2004) 2004 MT 124 321 Mont. 250 In re the MARRIAGE OF Ronald T. SWANSON, Petitioner and Appellant, and Rennee A. Swanson, Respondent and Cross-Appellant. No. 03-439. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs November 13, 2003. Decided May 11, 2004. *419