Cases

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, an inmate of a Wisconsin state prison, filed suit under. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the prison’s warden (Foster) and a prison guard (Schneider), alleging in his complaint that Schneider had inflicted cruel and unusual punishment on him. The district court dismissed the complaint at “screening,” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A — which is to say before any re

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. Ronald Schneider appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 1 We affirm. A jury found Schneider guilty of first degree murder, burglary, and kidnapping. During his separate sanity trial, the

OPINION OF THE COURT Douglas E. Hoffman, J. Respondent Ronald G. Schneider’s motion to dismiss this *115owner-occupancy summary holdover proceeding presents the court with an issue of apparent first impression: Whether the automatic stay provision of section 362 (a) of the Federal Bankruptcy Code (11 USC) voided petitioner Samson Evans’ service upo

*194OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Order entered December 15, 1999 affirmed, with $10 costs. In this owner occupancy holdover proceeding, we agree that the 120-150-day notice of nonrenewal (9 NYCRR 2524.4 [a] [4]; 2524.2 [c] [3]), served by landlord without knowledge of tenant’s then pending — but since concluded — bankruptcy proc

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Bar Docket No. 10386 In the Matter of RONALD SCHNEIDER, Petitioner. ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT On June 20, 2023, the court transferred Ronald Schneider's Kansas law license to disabled status. The court ordered that Schneider must not practice law unless the court reinstates his law license to active sta

[Cite as Schneider v. Schneider, 2021-Ohio-1058.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO RONALD D. SCHNEIDER, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NOS. 2020-A-0007 - vs - :

581 S.E.2d 603 (2003) 260 Ga. App. 296 SCHNEIDER v. SUSQUEHANNA RADIO CORPORATION. Susquehanna Radio Corporation v. Garver. Nos. A02A1654, A02A1655. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 14, 2003. Certiorari Denied July 14, 2003. Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco, Ned Blumenthal, Michael K. Jablonski, Marc B. Hersh

111 F.Supp.2d 204 (2000) Candace CARRABUS, Christopher Barry and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Alan SCHNEIDER, Personnel Officer of the County of Suffolk and the County of Suffolk, Defendants. No. 00-CV-2885 ILG. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 28, 2000. Timothy B. Glynn, Glynn and Mercep, Stony Brook, NY, A. Craig Purcell, Rubin &a;

*224OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Judgments unanimously affirmed. Jeffrey Schneider and his 16-year-old son, Jared Schneider, were separately arrested for hunting deer with the aid of a preestablished bait pile. Environmental Conservation Police Officer Hatch testified that he observed a bait pile (which contained apples and corn), about 5

VANDE WALLE, Justice. John Schneider appealed from a judgment awarding Donna Schneider $4,639.07 with interest due on a loan. We affirm the money judgment but remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. John and Donna were divorced in 1983. Subsequent thereto John borrowed in excess of $20,000 from Donna and on June 1, 1986, John signed a note due in six months for the unpaid amount. John fa

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Plaintiffs-appellants Candace Carrabus, Christopher Barry, et al (“Carrabus plaintiffs”) appeal from a September 26, 2000 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (I. Leo Glasser, J.) dismissing all of the Carrabus plai

OPINION OF THE COURT Herbert J. Adlerberg, J. On June 14, 1984, following a jury trial before this court, the defendant was convicted of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (1) and (2). At the close of the case, and prior to summations and charge, the defendant moved for a trial order of dismissal as to the count alleging a violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2). The cour

132 Wis.2d 171 (1986) 389 N.W.2d 835 John J. SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet B. SCHNEIDER, Defendant, Allen E. SCHNEIDER and Carol J. Schneider, Defendants-Respondents. No. 85-0447. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs May 7, 1986. Decided May 22, 1986. *172 For

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Ronald Romandine is a prisoner of Wisconsin, serving time for racketeering and theft offenses. He also has a federal conviction for credit card fraud. 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2). The state and federal offenses are unrelated. Romandine’s federal sentence, imposed in January 1994, will commence after his state sentence ends— or so the sentencing judge decla

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Ronald Long Feather appeals his convictions for voluntary manslaughter, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 1112, 1153, assault with a dangerous weapon, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(3), 1153, and assault resulting in serious injury, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(6), 1153. We affirm the judgment of the trial cou

RYDER, Judge. Wanda Lee Schneider appeals from the order awarding her attorney’s fees, alleging that the fee was apportioned contrary to a prior agreement and order. We agree and reverse. The parties obtained a final judgment of dissolution, from which both appealed. The appeals were voluntarily dismissed after the parties stipulated to amendments to the final judgment including that:

99 B.R. 52 (1989) In re John A. SCHNEIDER, Debtor. Ronald F. MARVICK and Sybil L. Marvick, Plaintiffs, v. John A. SCHNEIDER; Steven M. Presba, individually and/or as Trustee of the Chief Living Trust; the Chief Living Trust; and William S. Weinstein, Trustee in Bankruptcy for the debtor, Defendants. No. 86-01430, Adv. No. A86-03980. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle.</

ORDER Richard Tao Investments, LLC appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Custom Insurance Services, Inc. and Ron Schneider on its petition for negligent procurement and negligent misrepresentation. We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Custom Insurance Services, Inc. and Ron Schneider on Richard Tao Investments, LLC’s claims of negligent procurement and negligent misrepr

YETKA, Justice. The appellant-defendant, Ronald Schneider, appeals from the decision of a jury in Hennepin County District Court, first, finding him guilty of burglary, kidnapping and first-degree murder and then, in the second half of his bifurcated trial, rejecting his defense of insanity. We affirm the conviction and sentences imposed. The events for which defendant faced trial began on February 13. On

146 Wis.2d 701 (1988) 431 N.W.2d 756 Raymond P. SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim RUCH alias, Defendant-Respondent. No. 88-0585. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs August 4, 1988. Decided September 29, 1988. *702 For the plaintiff-appellant the cause was submitted on t