Cases

907 S.W.2d 454 (1995) Enrique PADILLA, Petitioner, v. Ernest J. LaFRANCE, et al., Respondents. No. 94-0579. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued January 3, 1995. Decided May 25, 1995. Rehearing Overruled October 5, 1995. *455 James B. Lewis, Ronald P. Schramm, Glover Anderson Chandler & Uzick, Hous

J-E02001-19 2020 PA Super 149 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SCHNALL, MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN : PENNSYLVANIA SENESE, JOHN SHURINA, JOHN : SIGNORILE, KEVIN SOKOL, : ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK : VENTRELLA, JOSPH VITALE, PATRICK : VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM : WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND : WILLIAM YOUNGSON, : No. 2105 EDA

J-A22039-17 2018 PA Super 267 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT SCHNALL, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN SENESE, JOHN OF SHURINA, JOHN SIGNORILE, KEVIN PENNSYLVANIA SOKOL, ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK VENTRELLA, JOSEPH VITALE, PATRICK VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND WILLIAM YOUNGSON, Appellants v. AMERICAN LAFRANCE, LLC AND FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION,

J-E02001-19 2020 PA Super 149 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SCHNALL, MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN : PENNSYLVANIA SENESE, JOHN SHURINA, JOHN : SIGNORILE, KEVIN SOKOL, : ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK : VENTRELLA, JOSPH VITALE, PATRICK : VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM : WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND : WILLIAM YOUNGSON, : No. 2105 EDA

J-A22039-17 2018 PA Super 267 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SCHNALL, MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN : PENNSYLVANIA SENESE, JOHN SHURINA, JOHN : SIGNORILE, KEVIN SOKOL, : ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK : VENTRELLA, JOSPH VITALE, PATRICK : VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM : WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND : WILLIAM YOUNGSON, : No. 2105 ED

875 S.W.2d 730 (1994) Enrique PADILLA, Appellant, v. Ernest J. LaFRANCE, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ruth LaFrance, Madeleine LaFrance, Individually and as Next Friend of Michelle LaFrance, Marlene Luther and Marilyn Koenig, Appellees. No. B14-93-00134-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). April 7, 1994. Rehearing Denied M

LYNN, C.J. Respondent Gregory R. Riso appeals an order of the Circuit Court ( Weaver , J.) denying his second post-trial motion for reconsideration based on the court's finding that he forfeited his right to a statute of limitations defense. 1 We affirm. I The follo

NO. 07-09-0249-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JANUARY 11, 2011 ______________________________ WILLIAM COALE AND JULIE COALE, Appellants v. RONALD SCOTT, HAZEL SCOTT, JACQUELINE SCOTT, JUDY SAUR, SHEA SAUR AND HEATHER SAUR, Appellees _______________________________ FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY; NO. C2004-0600C; HON. CHARLES R.

NO. 07-09-0249-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JANUARY 11, 2011 ______________________________ WILLIAM COALE AND JULIE COALE, Appellants

NO. 07-09-0249-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 30, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00410-CV EUGENE L. BUTLER, ROBERT E. CHAMBERLAIN, RONALD E. SMITH AND SHIP AND SAIL, INC., Appellants V. AMEGY BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TO MAXIMBANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 125th District Court Harris

Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion filed November 3, 2011 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-09-00495-CV MARY RIGGINS, Appellant V. RONALD E. HILL, LINDA C. HILL, WEST COLUMBIA PLAZA LTD. AND LUCKY LINDY DEVELOPMENT, Appellees On Appeal from the 412th Dis

Opinion William Coale and Julie Coale (the Coales) appeal from an order approving a Rule 11 agreement purportedly entered into by the Coales and Ronald Scott, Hazel Scott, Jacqueline Scott, Judy Saur, Shea Saur and Heather Saur (the Scotts). Through two issues, it is contended that the trial court abused its discretion by enforcing a Rule 11 agreement after its plenary power had expired and which agreement improperly expanded the Scotts' righ

Opinion filed October 3, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-23-00110-CR __________ RANDY VIRGIL ECHOLS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 220th District Court Comanc

958 So.2d 1102 (2007) Avi NUNEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D06-3077. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 20, 2007. *1103 Ronald S. Lowy and Clayton R. Kaeiser of Lowy & Cook, P.A., Miami, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, James J. Carney and Claudin

669 F.3d 518 (2012) PRESTON EXPLORATION COMPANY, L.P.; PEC Partnership; T.S.C. Oil & Gas, Inc.; and Frank Willis, III, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GSF, L.L.C. and Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-20599. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 1, 2012. *519 Roger Dale Townsend (argued),

233 S.W.3d 591 (2007) Ronald W. DISNEY, et al., Appellants v. Beverly GOLLAN, Appellee. No. 05-05-01645-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. September 19, 2007. *592 Richard A. Rohan, Jeffrey S. Levinger, Charles J. Blanchard, Carrington, Coleman, Sloman, & Blumenthal, LLP, Michael J. Collins, Deborah G. Hankinson, Law Offi

Gants, C.J. This case presents two issues on appeal: first, whether a defendant’s ability to pay should be considered by a judge in deciding whether to order restitution as a condition of probation and in deciding the amount of any such restitution; and second, where goods are stolen from a retail store, whether the amount of the victim’s actual economic loss for purposes of restitution is the replacement value or the retail sale

380 B.R. 277 (2008) In re Fred LABERGE, Debtor. No. 07-43302-HJB. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. January 4, 2008. *278 Allan R. Curhan, Allan R. Curhan & Associates, Plymouth, MA, for Debtor. *279 SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION HENRY J. BO

OPINION BY Judge COHN JUBELIRER. North Pittsburgh Drywall Co., Inc. (Employer) petitions for review of the Order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed the remand decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Employer’s Petition to Suspend and/or Modify (Suspension Petition) the workers’ compensation benefits of Jason Owen (Claimant), granting Claimant’s Petition for Penalti