Cases

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ____________

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MORGAN T. ZURN LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 February 5, 2024 Paul G.

351 S.W.3d 274 (2011) Ronald MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. WD 73244. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 1, 2011. Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Before Division

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS In Re: Tobacco Litigation FILED November 3, 2014 Ronald Accord, et al., RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Plain

328 S.W.3d 713 (2010) Ronald MORRIS, Claimant/Appellant, v. PREFERRED MEAL SYSTEMS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. No. ED 95428. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. November 9, 2010. Ronald Morris, St. Louis, MO, pro se. Michael Pritchett, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Preferred Meal Systems, St. Lo

Paul L. Maloney, United States District Judge David Charron filed for bankruptcy. Among the debts he sought to discharge, Charron identified the approximately $350,000 he owed Glenn Morris. The money represented the costs and fees awarded to Morris in a contempt hearing against Charron. Morris contested whether the debt was dischargeable and an adversary proceeding was initiated. See Glenn S. Morris and the Glenn S. Mor

Agnes, A.J. I. Introduction Defendant Ronald Morris (“Defendant”) has pled guilty to two counts of rape of a child (G.L.c. 265, §23) and two counts of indecent assault and battery on a child under the age of 14 (G.L.c. 265, §13B). During the plea colloquy, he was advised that one of the consequences of pleading guilty was that he could be on parole for the remainder of his life pursuant to the Massachuset

Opinion BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Ronald Dean Morris pleaded no contest to the felony charge of petty theft with three or more prior theft convictions (Pen. Code, § 666, *97 subd. (a)),

23 Cal.Rptr.3d 881 (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 527 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Ronald MORRIS, Defendant and Respondent. No. D044192. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 1. February 3, 2005. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 3, 2005. Review Denied May 11, 2005.

BERGER, J. Beverly Cesary Daniel appeals the final summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Associated Investigators, Inc. and John B. Morris, an employee of Associated Investigators. Daniel argues the trial court erred when it determined that Associated Investigators and Morris were subsequent tortfeasors of BankFirst and that the settlement and release of BankFirst discharged Associated Investigators and M

The petition by the defendant Dee C. Cheshire for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 403 (AC 25279), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant Dee C. Cheshire personally was liable for the named plaintiffs injury?”

877 A.2d 899 (2005) 90 Conn.App. 403 Ronald MORRIS et al. v. CEE DEE, LLC, et al. No. 25279. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued April 21, 2005. Decided July 26, 2005. *902 Matthew G. Berger, New London, for the appellant (defendant Dee C. Cheshire). Toby M. Schaffer, for the app

MARTIN L. C. FELDMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are two motions: (1) the defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss; and (2) the plaintiff's motion to strike the defendant's supplemental memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the plaintiff's motion to strike is GRANTED, and the defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part, as to the plaintiff's "class of one" Equal Prot

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0081p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RONALD MOORE; GINA WALDROP; DONALD MOORE, ┐ JR., │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │

350 S.W.3d 855 (2011) Jennifer KNOX and Chris Kohlmeyer, Respondents, v. Thomas MORRIS, Appellant, and St. Charles County, Defendant. No. ED 96030. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. October 18, 2011. Ronald D. Kwentus, Maryland Heights, MO, for appellant. Daniel L. Goldberg, St. Charles, MO, for respondents. Before PATRICI

259 P.3d 116 (2011) 2011 UT 40 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Petitioner, v. Vance MORRIS, Defendant and Respondent. No. 20090835. Supreme Court of Utah. July 22, 2011. *118 Mark L. Shurtleff, Att'y Gen., Jeffrey S. Gray, Asst. Att'y Gen., Salt Lake City, Walter J. Bird, Monticello, for plaintiff. Ron

430 B.R. 824 (2010) In re Larry D. MORRIS, Debtor(s). No. 08-12647. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division. June 7, 2010. *826 Ronald E. Darby, Camden, TN, for Debtor. Jesse H. Ford, III, Jackson, TN, trustee. MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: "Motion to Lift Stay to Allow for Pursuit of State Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEBTOR-DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO AMEND THE COURT’S FINDINGS UNDER RULE 52, AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 59, AND FOR RECONSIDERATION UNDER RULE 60 James W. Boyd, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND. On September 30, 2015, this Court en-, tered an Opinion and Order Denying De

969 N.E.2d 119 (2012) Don MORRIS and Randy Coakes, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Brad CRAIN, Richard Redpath, BioSafe Engineering, LLC, Steve Biesecker, Tyler Johnson, Brandon Ross and Chris Sollars, Appellees-Defendants. No. 32A01-1109-PL-414. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 18, 2012. *120 James E. Ayers, Wernle, Ristine & Aye

ROTH, Judge: ¶1 This case involves multiple competing claims related to a parcel of real property (the Property). After a trial, the district court quieted title to the Property in Short Sale Services LLC. Off-Piste Capital LLC appeals, arguing that its claim to title is superior to Short Sale's for a variety of reasons. American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc. cross-appeals, claiming tha