Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-KA-00851-COA RONALD MOORE APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/29/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. THOMAS J. GARDNER III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR AP

09/30/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 3, 2021 RONALD MOORE v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 19-0356-I Patricia Head Moskal, Chancellor _________________________________

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0081p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RONALD MOORE; GINA WALDROP; DONALD MOORE, ┐ JR., │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as Jul 30 2015, 10:47 am precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Mark Lee

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 6, 2002 Session RONALD G. MOORE v. AVERITT EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 00C-2626 Thomas W. Brothers, Judge No. M2001-02502-COA-R3-CV - Filed October 11, 2002 Plaintiff was a former state employee and newly hired employee of Av

NO. 12-01-00203-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS RONALD MOORE,§ APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

53 F.3d 341NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ronald MOORE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10447. United States Court of

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Ronald Keith Moore, * From the County Court at Law No. 2 of Midland County Trial Court No. FM-43,005 Vs. No. 11-16-00282-CV * January 31, 2019 Zuzanna E. Moore, * Opinion by Wright, S.C.

Opinion filed January 31, 2019 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-16-00282-CV __________ RONALD KEITH MOORE, Appellant V. ZUZANNA E. MOORE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Mi

Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion filed December 31, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00993-CR RONALD ABB MOORE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 179th District Court Harris County, Texas

Order filed October 6, 2016 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-16-00282-CV __________ RONALD KEITH MOORE, Appellant V. ZUZANNA E. MOORE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Midland

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 13, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas Nos. 05-09-01346-CR, 05-09-01347-CR, 05-09-01348-CR, 05-09-01349-CR, 05-09-01350-CR, 05-09-01351-CR, 05-09-01352-CR, 05-09-01353-CR, 05-09-01354-CR RONALD ADOLPH MOORE, Appellant

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: Dr. Ronald E. Moore, Jr. appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims for race discrimination and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Exercising plenary review, see Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc. v. Beech Street Corp., 208 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2000), and with the benefit of oral argument, we affir

*916ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT S. THOMAS ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendant City of Memphis’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 108) and Defendant Phillip Penny’s Motion for Summary Judgment on claims against him in his individual and official capacities (ECF No. 110), both filed on Apr

60 F.3d 823NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Jean BOYD; J. Allen Murphy; Anthony M. Brannon,Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-6581.

*334 PER CURIAM. ¶ 1. We review the report and recommendation of the referee, Reserve Judge Robert E. Kinney, that the license of Attorney Ronald J. Moore to practice law in Wisconsin should be suspended for a period of three years and that Attorney Moore should be required to pay the full costs of this disc

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Elder, Frank and Humphreys Argued at Chesapeake, Virginia MATTHEW THOMAS BENNETT OPINION BY v. Record No. 1803-11-1 JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS AUGUST 21, 2012 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA WILLIAM JAMES BOWERS, JR. v. Record No. 1804-11-1 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JOHN W. BROWN v. Record No

CASANUEVA, Judge. Ronald W. Moore appeals a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Roberta D. Moore. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred in determining his monthly income and, consequently, the amount of permanent alimony he must pay to his Former Wife. Roberta Moore filed a cross-appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to order her Former Husband to

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 43) AND DEFENDANT DOLLAR TREE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 44) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a civil rights action by Plaintiff Ronald Moore for discrimination at the Dollar Tree Store, located at 3780 West Shields Avenue in Fresno, California (the “Store”).

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 2, 2008 Session RONALD DONNELL MOORE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. P-18192 Carolyn Wade Blackett, Judge No. W2008-00034-CCA-R3-PC - Filed May 20, 2009 The petitioner, Ronald Donnell Moore, appeals the judgment of the Shelby Coun